Regulation
Bitcoin and privacy threatened by new European regulations
The representation of Bitcoin is seen with the European Union flag in the background in this illustration… [+] photo taken in Poland on November 29, 2020. Photo illustration by Jakub Porzycki/NurPhoto
NurPhoto via Getty Images
The European Parliament recently adopted the revised anti-money laundering regulation, despite significant public opposition and humanitarian groups. The Coalition for Real Changealso known as BTC
Bitcoin
Coalition, urged members of Parliament to reject the proposals due to concerns about violations of financial freedoms and privacy. However, their efforts were in vain and a Majority vote adopted the proposals.
During informal discussions, the European Commission, Parliament and Council ignored public comments on the proposed changes. This action was seen as a diminution of the role of European Parliamentthe only directly elected EU body, and has raised concerns about the risk of increased misuse of financial data by authoritarian regimes.
Implications and key questions
The new regulation could influence financial rules around the world, affecting personal financial freedoms not only within the EU, but globally. It characterizes confidential payment tools and crowdfunding platforms as high risks, likely to restrict financial operations under the pretext of preventing money laundering and terrorist financing.
Crowdfunding: The AMLR classifies all crowdfunding platforms as high risk, which could increase operational costs, reduce the donor base and hinder vital efforts for activists and humanitarian actors. NGO during crises.
Financial exclusion: The new rules remove protections that helped include more people in the financial system and avoided unfair restrictions, affecting immigrants, dual citizens and other often vulnerable people. This deprives them of necessary financial protections and potentially increases discrimination within the financial system.
Privacy Payment Instruments: Characterizing private digital wallets or self-hosted wallets as risky ignores their role in promoting financial access and supporting humanitarian efforts, which could hinder NGOs’ ability to securely transfer funds to affected areas. to oppressive regimes.
AMLR extends beyond EU borders. The regulation sets a global precedent for financial regulation, which could impact third country. The proposal aims confidential payment and crowdfunding tools as self-hosted wallets and blenders, also labeling them as high risk.
Following the adoption of the LAMR, attention was focused on the activities of Austrian Raiffeisen Bank International in Russia. MPs raised concerns over the bank’s plans to continue and expand its operations by hiring more than 2,000 new employees, highlighting a critical gap in the enforcement of sanctions and AML regulations. As AMLR targets technologies such as Bitcoin wallets and mixers, large financial institutions continue operations that may contravene sanctions or facilitate money laundering.
Seth Hertlein, global head of policy at Ledger, expresses concerns about possible overreach. In a recent LinkedIn Comment, Hertlein criticized the removal of Section 41(a) because it suggests a shift toward surveillance of individuals rather than protection of their financial freedom. He said: “The removal of Article 41(a) is truly shameful and clearly shows where Member States’ priorities lie. There is no problem in reducing the risks a little, as long as their surveillance apparatus stays in place.”
Regulatory Support
Promoters argue that the Anti-Money Laundering Regulation strengthens the EU’s defenses against complex global threats such as money laundering and terrorist financing. The AMLR closes loopholes exploited by criminals by regulating digital wallets and mixers.
Proponents view AMLR as a crucial tool to combat widespread financial crime. They see the regulation as a necessary step to safeguard the economic stability of the EU and beyond. Circle’s Patrick Hansen commented on the recent approval of the package by the European Parliament.
Future results and global influence
Acceptance of AMLR likely to have global influence financial regulationwhich could lead to an increase regulatory burdens that disproportionately affect small entities and nonprofits, stifling innovation and civic engagement. Human rights and humanitarian groups fear the regulations could signal a shift toward more restrictive financial environments and invasions of privacy globally.
Given the importance of financial security and freedomsa more balanced approach to financial regulation is needed to protect fundamental rights and support a inclusive financial ecosystem that supports social and humanitarian initiatives.
Lyudmyla Kozlovska, president of the Open Dialogue Foundation and coordinator of the BTC Coalition, presents the findings of seven reports published by the Open Dialogue Foundation over the past two years. These reports reveal how banks in third countries, such as Kazakhstan and Turkey, are used to launder money or evade sanctions from authoritarian regimes. “Dictators don’t need Bitcoin wallets or mixers; they prefer established banks, especially Western ones, operating in regions like Russia, which has recently contributed 800 million euros in taxes for the Kremlin“, says Kozlovska.
The case of ING Bank, one of the leading European banks operating in Russia, illustrates the problem of inconsistent application of financial regulations. Although ING has been highlighted among other EU banks for its operations in Russia, it has maintained services that raise concerns over AML and CFT compliance, particularly given geopolitical tensions and sanctions. economic.
It also demonstrates the broader problem of inconsistent application of financial regulation. The bank discontinued its services with the Open Dialogue Foundation during a politically motivated campaign against the foundation under the guise of complying with anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing laws, influenced by the coordinated targeting of the Polish Law and Justice party, the Plahotniuc and Nazarbayev regimes.
And after?
The scale of illicit activities involving traditional fiat currencies globally must also be considered for context. According to The United Nations, between $800 and $2 trillion is laundered each year, which represents approximately 2 to 5% of global GDP. This figure demonstrates the challenges of combatting financial crime within traditional banking systems, where most money laundering still occurs. Lawmakers must balance combating these crimes with the need to protect fundamental financial freedoms and promote financial inclusion.
With the AMLR set to influence global financial regulatory standards, its acceptance marks an important moment for the future of financial regulation, both within the EU and internationally. Members of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe call for urgent reforms to ensure that the regulation does not inadvertently harm those it aims to protect.
To mitigate these consequences, Lyudmyla Kozlovska calls on privacy advocates to engage with future MEPs on their policy proposals. “We must educate EU policymakers on the social necessity of bitcoin payments and crowdfunding mechanisms and prevent the misuse of anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing laws,” insists Kozlovsky.
The acceptance of the anti-money laundering regulation marks an important moment in the EU’s efforts to combat financial crime. However, while the regulation sets new precedents, it also raises concerns about possible overreach and its impact on privacy and financial freedom. This balance between security and freedom remains a crucial challenge, as stakeholders from all walks of life call for a nuanced approach that supports both effective law enforcement and basic human rights.
Regulation
Crypto community gets involved in anti-government protests in Nigeria
Amid the #EndBadGovernanceInNigeria protests in Nigeria, a notable shift is occurring within the country’s cryptocurrency sector. As the general public demands sweeping governance reforms, crypto community leaders are seizing the opportunity to advocate for specific regulatory changes.
Rume Ophi, former secretary of the Blockchain Stakeholders Association of Nigeria (SiBAN), stressed the critical need to integrate crypto-focused demands into the broader agenda of the protests.
Ophi explained the dual benefit of such requirements, noting that proper regulation can spur substantial economic growth by attracting investors and creating job opportunities. Ophi noted, “Including calls for favorable crypto regulations is not just about the crypto community; it’s about leveraging these technologies to foster broader economic prosperity.”
Existing government efforts
In opposition to Ophi’s call for action, Chimezie Chuta, chair of the National Blockchain Policy Steering Committee, presents a different view. He pointed out The Nigerian government continued efforts to nurture the blockchain and cryptocurrency industries.
According to Chuta, the creation of a steering committee was essential to effectively address the needs of the crypto community.
Chuta also highlighted the creation of a subcommittee to harmonize regulations for virtual asset service providers (VASPs). With the aim of streamlining operations and providing clear regulatory direction, the initiative involves cooperation with major organizations including the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN). “Our efforts should mitigate the need for protest as substantial progress is being made to address the needs of the crypto industry,” Chuta said.
A united call for support
The ongoing dialogue between the crypto community and government agencies reflects a complex landscape of negotiations and demands for progress.
While actors like Ophi are calling for more direct action and the inclusion of crypto demands in protest agendas, government figures like Chuta are advocating for recognition of the steps already taken.
As protests continue, the crypto community’s push for regulatory reform highlights a crucial aspect of Nigeria’s broader fight to improve governance and economic policies. Both sides agree that favorable regulations are critical to the successful adoption and implementation of blockchain technologies, signaling a potentially transformative era for Nigeria’s economic framework.
Read also : OKX Exchange Exits Nigerian Market Amid Regulatory Crackdown
Regulation
Cryptocurrency Regulations in Slovenia 2024
Slovenia, a small but highly developed European country with a population of 2.1 million, boasts a rich industrial history that has contributed greatly to its strong economy. As the most economically developed Slavic nation, Slovenia has grown steadily since adopting the euro in 2007. Its openness to innovation has been a key factor in its success in the industrial sector, making it a prime destination for cryptocurrency enthusiasts. Many believe that Slovenia is poised to become a powerful fintech hub in Europe. But does its current regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies support such aspirations?
Let’s explore Slovenia’s cryptocurrency regulations and see if they can propel the country to the forefront of the cryptocurrency landscape. My expectations are positive. What are yours? Before we answer, let’s dig a little deeper.
1. Cryptocurrency regulation in Slovenia: an overview
Slovenia is renowned for its innovation-friendly stance, providing a supportive environment for emerging technologies such as blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Under the Payment Services and Systems Act, cryptocurrencies are classified as virtual assets rather than financial or monetary instruments.
The regulation of the cryptocurrency sector in Slovenia is decentralized. Different authorities manage different aspects of the ecosystem. For example, the Bank of Slovenia and the Securities Market Agency oversee cryptocurrency transactions to ensure compliance with financial laws, including anti-money laundering (AML) and terrorist financing regulations. The Slovenian Act on the Prevention of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing (ZPPDFT-2) incorporates the EU’s 5th Anti-Money Laundering Directive (5MLD) and aligns with the latest FATF recommendations. All virtual currency service providers must register with the Office of the Republic of Slovenia.
2. Cryptocurrency regulation in Slovenia: what’s new?
Several notable developments have taken place this year in the cryptocurrency sector in Slovenia:
July 25, 2024:Slovenia has issued a €30 million on-chain digital sovereign bond, the first of its kind in the EU, with a yield of 3.65%, maturing on 25 November 2024.
May 14, 2024:NiceHash has announced the first Slovenian Bitcoin-focused conference, NiceHashX, scheduled for November 8-9 in Maribor.
3. Explanation of the tax framework for cryptocurrencies in Slovenia
The Slovenian cryptocurrency tax framework provides clear guidelines for individuals and businesses. According to the Slovenian Financial Administration, the tax treatment depends on the status of the trader and the nature of the transaction.
- People:Income earned from cryptocurrencies through employment or ongoing business activities is subject to personal income tax. However, capital gains from transactions or market fluctuations are exempt from tax.
- Companies:Capital gains from cryptocurrency-related activities are subject to a 19% corporate tax. Value-added tax (VAT) generally applies at a rate of 22%, although cryptocurrency transactions that are considered as means of payment are exempt from VAT. Companies are not allowed to limit payment methods to cryptocurrencies alone. Tokens issued during ICOs must follow standard accounting rules and corporate tax law.
4. Cryptocurrency Mining in Slovenia: What You Need to Know
Cryptocurrency mining is not restricted in Slovenia, but income from mining is considered business income and is therefore taxable. This includes rewards from validating transactions and any additional income from mining operations. Both individuals and legal entities must comply with Slovenian tax regulations.
5. Timeline of the development of cryptocurrency regulation in Slovenia
Here is a timeline highlighting the evolution of cryptocurrency regulations in Slovenia:
- 2013:The Slovenian Financial Administration has issued guidelines stating that income from cryptocurrency transactions should be taxed.
- 2017:The Slovenian Financial Administration has provided more detailed guidelines on cryptocurrency taxation, depending on factors such as the status of the trader and the type of transaction.
- 2023:The EU adopted the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) Regulation, establishing a uniform regulatory framework for crypto-assets, their issuers and service providers across the EU.
Endnote
Slovenia’s approach to the cryptocurrency sector is commendable, reflecting its optimistic view of the future of cryptocurrencies. The country’s balanced regulatory framework supports cryptocurrency innovation while protecting users’ rights and preventing illegal activities. Recent developments demonstrate Slovenia’s commitment to continually improving its regulatory environment. Slovenia’s cryptocurrency regulatory framework sets a positive example for other nations navigating the evolving cryptocurrency landscape.
Read also : Hong Kong Cryptocurrency Regulations 2024
Regulation
A Blank Sheet for Cryptocurrencies: Kamala Harris’ Regulatory Opportunity
photo by Shubham Dhage on Unsplash
As the cryptocurrency landscape continues to evolve, the need for clear regulation has never been more pressing.
With Vice President Kamala Harris now leading the charge on digital asset regulation in the United States, this represents a unique opportunity to start fresh. This fresh start can foster innovation and protect consumers. It can also pave the way for widespread adoption across industries, including real estate agencies, healthcare providers, and online gaming platforms like these. online casinos ukAccording to experts at SafestCasinoSites, these platforms come with benefits such as bonus offers, a wide selection of games, and various payment methods. Ultimately, all this increase in adoption could propel the cryptocurrency market forward.
With this in mind, let’s look at the current state of cryptocurrency regulation in the United States, a complex and confusing landscape. Multiple agencies, including the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), have overlapping jurisdictions, creating a fragmented regulatory environment. This lack of clarity has stifled innovation as companies are reluctant to invest in the United States, fearing regulatory repercussions. A coherent and clear regulatory framework is urgently needed to realize the full potential of cryptocurrencies in the United States.
While the US struggles to find its footing, other countries, such as Singapore and the UK, are actively looking into the cryptocurrency sector by adopting clear and supportive regulatory frameworks. This has led to a brain drain, with companies choosing to locate in more conducive environments.
Vice President Kamala Harris has a unique opportunity to change that narrative and start over. Regulation of cryptocurrencies. By taking a comprehensive and inclusive approach, it can help create a framework that balances consumer protection with innovation and growth. The time has come for clear and effective regulation of cryptocurrencies in the United States.
Effective regulation of digital assets is essential to foster a safe and innovative environment. The key principles guiding this regulation are clarity, innovation, global cooperation, consumer protection, and flexibility. Clear definitions and guidelines eliminate ambiguity while encouraging experimentation and development to ensure progress. Collaboration with international partners establishes consistent standards, preventing regulatory arbitrage. Strong safeguards protect consumers from fraud and market abuse, and adaptability allows for evolution in response to emerging trends and technologies, striking a balance between innovation and protection.
The benefits of effective cryptocurrency regulation are multiple and far-reaching. By establishing clear guidelines, governments can attract investors and mainstream users, driving growth and adoption. This can, in turn, position countries like the United States as global leaders in fintech and innovation. Strong safeguards will also increase consumer confidence in digital assets and related products, increasing economic activity.
A thriving crypto industry can contribute significantly to GDP and job creation, which has a positive impact on the overall economy. Furthermore, effective regulation has paved the way for the growth of many businesses such as tech startups, online casinos, and pharmaceutical companies, demonstrating that clear guidelines can open up new opportunities without stifling innovation. This is a great example of how regulation can allay fears of regressive policies, even if Kamala Harris does not repeal the current progressive approach. By adopting effective regulation, governments can create fertile ground for the crypto industry to thrive, thereby promoting progress and prosperity.
Regulation
South Korea Imposes New ‘Monitoring’ Fees on Cryptocurrency Exchanges
Big news! The latest regulatory changes in South Korea are expected to impact major cryptocurrency exchanges like Upbit and Bithumb. Under the updated regulations, these platforms will now have to pay monitoring fees, which could cause problems for some exchanges.
Overview of new fees
In the latest move to regulate cryptocurrencies, the Financial Services Commission announced on July 1 the revised “Enforcement Order of the Act on the Establishment of the Financial Services Commission, etc.” update “Regulations on the collection of contributions from financial institutions, etc.” According to local legislation newsThe regulations require virtual asset operators to pay supervisory fees for inspections conducted by the Financial Supervisory Service starting next year. The total fees for the four major exchanges are estimated at around 300 million won, or about $220,000.
Apportionment of costs
Upbit, which holds a dominant market share, is expected to bear more than 90% of the total fee, or about 272 million won ($199,592) based on its operating revenue. Bithumb will pay about 21.14 million won ($155,157), while Coinone and GOPAX will contribute about 6.03 million won ($4,422) and 830,000 won ($608), respectively. Korbit is excluded from this fee due to its lower operating revenue.
Impact on the industry
The supervision fee will function similarly to a quasi-tax for financial institutions subject to inspections by the Financial Supervisory Service. The new law requires any company with a turnover of 3 billion won or more to pay the fee.
In the past, fees for electronic financial companies and P2P investment firms were phased in over three years. However, the taxation of virtual asset operators has been accelerated, reflecting the rapid growth of the cryptocurrency market and increasing regulatory scrutiny.
Industry reactions
The rapid introduction of the fee was unexpected by some industry players, who had expected a delay. Financial Supervisory Service officials justified the decision by citing the creation of the body concerned and the costs already incurred.
While larger exchanges like Upbit and Bithumb can afford the cost, smaller exchanges like Coinone and GOPAX, which are currently operating at a loss, could face an additional financial burden. This is part of a broader trend of declining trading volumes for South Korean exchanges, which have seen a 30% drop since the new law went into effect.
-
Regulation7 months ago
Ripple CTO and Cardano founder clash over XRP’s regulatory challenges ⋆ ZyCrypto
-
Regulation5 months ago
Nancy Pelosi Considers Supporting Republican Crypto Bill FIT21 – London Business News
-
Videos6 months ago
Cryptocurrency News: Bitcoin, ETH ETF, AI Crypto Rally, AKT, TON & MORE!!
-
Regulation6 months ago
Bitcoin’s future is ‘bleak’ and ripe for regulation, says lead developer
-
News6 months ago
The trader earned $46 million with PEPE after reaching a new ATH
-
Blockchain6 months ago
Solana ranks the fastest blockchain in the world, surpassing Ethereum, Polygon ⋆ ZyCrypto
-
Blockchain6 months ago
Solana Surpasses Ethereum and Polygon as the Fastest Blockchain ⋆ ZyCrypto
-
Regulation6 months ago
🔒 Crypto needs regulation to thrive: Tyler Cowen
-
Videos6 months ago
Who Really CONTROLS THE MARKETS!! Her plans REVEALED!!
-
Videos7 months ago
Kucoin safe?? Exchange REVIEW and beginner’s guide!!
-
Blockchain6 months ago
“Liquid vesting” is an oxymoronic feature of blockchain that allows early investors to sell without waiting
-
Videos6 months ago
Institutions purchasing MEMECOINS?! Everything you need to know!