Regulation
Battle lines drawn: Trump argues for crypto while Biden seeks to regulate industry
(Kitco News) – The 2024 presidential race is starting to heat up, with President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump stepping up their public appearances as they try to attract undecided voters – and crypto s announced as a key issue of the campaign.
On the pro-crypto side is Trump, who has lamented crypto companies fleeing the U.S. market for more welcoming jurisdictions, which he sees as long-term harm.
“Crypto is leaving the US due to hostility towards crypto,” Trump said during an event he hosted Wednesday at his home in Florida for a group of non-fungible token (NFT) enthusiasts. “We’re going to stop it because I don’t want this. If we’re going to accept it, we have to leave them here.”
He used the opportunity to present himself as pro-crypto, as opposed to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Democrats, whom he described as decidedly anti-crypto.
“Gensler is totally against it. Democrats are strongly opposed to it. [but] It’s okay with me; I want to make sure it’s good and solid and everything else, but I’m OK with that,” Trump said.
He also took credit for the recovery of the NFT market, affirming that his Mugshot NFTs and other collections “made NFTs hot again” at a time when the NFT market was stuck in the doldrums.
Trump also attacked Joe Biden-related meme coin Jeo Boden (BODEN), which currently has a market cap of $217 million after hitting a high of $655 million on April 10.
“That’s a lot of money for a coin; I don’t like this investment,” he says said.
On the other side of the spectrum is President Biden, who has specifically targeted the crypto industry in various proposals, including the reintroduction in March of a controversial proposal to impose a 30% excise tax on the cost of electricity used for Bitcoin mining.
The Digital Asset Mining Energy Tax (DAME) has been widely lambasted by industry professionals, who say it could push U.S.-based Bitcoin miners like RIOT Platforms and Marathon Digital Holdings to more welcoming jurisdictions, like Trump’s comments brought it up.
“A proposed 30% punitive tax on digital asset mining would destroy any foothold the industry has in America,” tweeted Wyoming Republican Senator Cynthia Lummis. “I will not let President Biden force the demise of the digital assets industry.”
Independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. also opposed the proposal, Tweeter“Cryptocurrencies, dominated by bitcoin, along with other cryptographic technologies, are a major driver of innovation. It is a mistake for the U.S. government to hinder industry and spur innovation elsewhere. Biden’s proposed 30% tax on cryptocurrency mining is a bad idea.”
“Just as a biodiverse ecosystem is a resilient ecosystem, our economy will also be more resilient if it has a diverse ecology of currencies, not just a single centrally controlled currency,” he said . added. “Today we see how fragile our overly centralized system is. »
Biden further showed which side of the crypto camp he is on by promising to veto HJ Res. 109, a resolution approved Wednesday by the U.S. House of Representatives that rejects SEC cryptocurrency accounting guidance that the industry says has dissuaded banks from servicing crypto clients.
The SEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 121 – also known as SAB 121 – was designed to help clarify the accounting treatment of crypto assets, by directing banks holding a customer’s digital tokens to do so in their own balance sheet, which could lead to massive capital expenditures.
A review of the bulletin by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) determined that the agency should have handled it as a matter of course, with full public comment and submission to Congress.
“SAB 121 was issued in response to demonstrated technological, legal and regulatory risks that caused substantial losses to consumers,” Biden said in a statement. statementadding that he “strongly opposes” any disruption of the SEC’s work on this topic.
“By invoking the Congressional Review Act, it could also inappropriately restrict the SEC’s ability to ensure appropriate safeguards and address future issues related to cryptoassets, including financial stability,” the statement said. “Limiting the SEC’s ability to maintain a comprehensive and effective financial regulatory framework for crypto-assets would introduce significant financial instability and uncertainty into the market.” If the President were to receive HJ Res. 109, he would veto it.
Despite this statement, the House voted strongly in favor of the resolution, with 21 Democrats joining Republicans in passing the measure.
With so much attention given to the crypto industry in Congress and the SEC, the topic is shaping up to be an influential platform in the upcoming elections amid growing awareness of digital assets following the launch of several spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs). in the USA
According to a Tuesday note from Geoffrey Kendrick, a digital assets researcher at Standard Chartered, a Trump administration would be more welcoming and less strict on Bitcoin and crypto than another Biden term would be.
“While Biden administration officials have taken a relatively tough stance on digital assets, Trump said in a March interview that if elected, he would not crack down on Bitcoin or other digital assets,” a writes Kendrick.
He added that Trump would also support a more positive regulatory environment and said the risk of US fiscal dominance with the Fed’s monetization of government debt was increasing, which supports alternative assets like crypto.
“We believe that a second Trump administration would be positive overall due to a more favorable regulatory environment,” the report said. “In a scenario of US fiscal dominance, we believe Bitcoin would be a good hedge against dedollarization and declining confidence in the US Treasury market.”
Kendrick added that U.S. fiscal dominance would likely have three effects on the U.S. Treasury curve: “a steeper 2-year/10-year nominal curve, an increase in breakevens greater than real yields, and an increase in the term premium.” “.
He noted that the price of Bitcoin had a positive correlation with these three potential developments.
Kendrick also warned that if Trump wins the election, a second administration could accelerate the withdrawal of foreign official buyers from the U.S. Treasury due to budgetary concerns, pointing out that during his first term, the average annual net sale of government debt American was 207 billion dollars per year. per year, compared to just $55 billion under Biden’s presidency.
“In addition to the passive boost provided to BTC by dedollarization, we expect a second Trump administration to actively support BTC (and digital assets in general) through looser regulation and the approval of ETFs at the American cash,” he said.
The report concludes by reiterating Standard Chartered’s year-end Bitcoin forecast, with the bank expecting a price of $150,000 in 2024 and $200,000 by the end of 2025, and in noting that Trump’s import tariffs would cause “several large reserve managers to buy.” BTC in 2025.”
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Kitco Metals Inc. The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information provided; however, neither Kitco Metals Inc. nor the author can guarantee such accuracy. This article is for informational purposes only. This is not a solicitation to trade any commodities, securities or other financial instruments. Kitco Metals Inc. and the author of this article accept no liability for loss and/or damage arising from the use of this publication.
Regulation
Crypto community gets involved in anti-government protests in Nigeria
Amid the #EndBadGovernanceInNigeria protests in Nigeria, a notable shift is occurring within the country’s cryptocurrency sector. As the general public demands sweeping governance reforms, crypto community leaders are seizing the opportunity to advocate for specific regulatory changes.
Rume Ophi, former secretary of the Blockchain Stakeholders Association of Nigeria (SiBAN), stressed the critical need to integrate crypto-focused demands into the broader agenda of the protests.
Ophi explained the dual benefit of such requirements, noting that proper regulation can spur substantial economic growth by attracting investors and creating job opportunities. Ophi noted, “Including calls for favorable crypto regulations is not just about the crypto community; it’s about leveraging these technologies to foster broader economic prosperity.”
Existing government efforts
In opposition to Ophi’s call for action, Chimezie Chuta, chair of the National Blockchain Policy Steering Committee, presents a different view. He pointed out The Nigerian government continued efforts to nurture the blockchain and cryptocurrency industries.
According to Chuta, the creation of a steering committee was essential to effectively address the needs of the crypto community.
Chuta also highlighted the creation of a subcommittee to harmonize regulations for virtual asset service providers (VASPs). With the aim of streamlining operations and providing clear regulatory direction, the initiative involves cooperation with major organizations including the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN). “Our efforts should mitigate the need for protest as substantial progress is being made to address the needs of the crypto industry,” Chuta said.
A united call for support
The ongoing dialogue between the crypto community and government agencies reflects a complex landscape of negotiations and demands for progress.
While actors like Ophi are calling for more direct action and the inclusion of crypto demands in protest agendas, government figures like Chuta are advocating for recognition of the steps already taken.
As protests continue, the crypto community’s push for regulatory reform highlights a crucial aspect of Nigeria’s broader fight to improve governance and economic policies. Both sides agree that favorable regulations are critical to the successful adoption and implementation of blockchain technologies, signaling a potentially transformative era for Nigeria’s economic framework.
Read also : OKX Exchange Exits Nigerian Market Amid Regulatory Crackdown
Regulation
Cryptocurrency Regulations in Slovenia 2024
Slovenia, a small but highly developed European country with a population of 2.1 million, boasts a rich industrial history that has contributed greatly to its strong economy. As the most economically developed Slavic nation, Slovenia has grown steadily since adopting the euro in 2007. Its openness to innovation has been a key factor in its success in the industrial sector, making it a prime destination for cryptocurrency enthusiasts. Many believe that Slovenia is poised to become a powerful fintech hub in Europe. But does its current regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies support such aspirations?
Let’s explore Slovenia’s cryptocurrency regulations and see if they can propel the country to the forefront of the cryptocurrency landscape. My expectations are positive. What are yours? Before we answer, let’s dig a little deeper.
1. Cryptocurrency regulation in Slovenia: an overview
Slovenia is renowned for its innovation-friendly stance, providing a supportive environment for emerging technologies such as blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Under the Payment Services and Systems Act, cryptocurrencies are classified as virtual assets rather than financial or monetary instruments.
The regulation of the cryptocurrency sector in Slovenia is decentralized. Different authorities manage different aspects of the ecosystem. For example, the Bank of Slovenia and the Securities Market Agency oversee cryptocurrency transactions to ensure compliance with financial laws, including anti-money laundering (AML) and terrorist financing regulations. The Slovenian Act on the Prevention of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing (ZPPDFT-2) incorporates the EU’s 5th Anti-Money Laundering Directive (5MLD) and aligns with the latest FATF recommendations. All virtual currency service providers must register with the Office of the Republic of Slovenia.
2. Cryptocurrency regulation in Slovenia: what’s new?
Several notable developments have taken place this year in the cryptocurrency sector in Slovenia:
July 25, 2024:Slovenia has issued a €30 million on-chain digital sovereign bond, the first of its kind in the EU, with a yield of 3.65%, maturing on 25 November 2024.
May 14, 2024:NiceHash has announced the first Slovenian Bitcoin-focused conference, NiceHashX, scheduled for November 8-9 in Maribor.
3. Explanation of the tax framework for cryptocurrencies in Slovenia
The Slovenian cryptocurrency tax framework provides clear guidelines for individuals and businesses. According to the Slovenian Financial Administration, the tax treatment depends on the status of the trader and the nature of the transaction.
- People:Income earned from cryptocurrencies through employment or ongoing business activities is subject to personal income tax. However, capital gains from transactions or market fluctuations are exempt from tax.
- Companies:Capital gains from cryptocurrency-related activities are subject to a 19% corporate tax. Value-added tax (VAT) generally applies at a rate of 22%, although cryptocurrency transactions that are considered as means of payment are exempt from VAT. Companies are not allowed to limit payment methods to cryptocurrencies alone. Tokens issued during ICOs must follow standard accounting rules and corporate tax law.
4. Cryptocurrency Mining in Slovenia: What You Need to Know
Cryptocurrency mining is not restricted in Slovenia, but income from mining is considered business income and is therefore taxable. This includes rewards from validating transactions and any additional income from mining operations. Both individuals and legal entities must comply with Slovenian tax regulations.
5. Timeline of the development of cryptocurrency regulation in Slovenia
Here is a timeline highlighting the evolution of cryptocurrency regulations in Slovenia:
- 2013:The Slovenian Financial Administration has issued guidelines stating that income from cryptocurrency transactions should be taxed.
- 2017:The Slovenian Financial Administration has provided more detailed guidelines on cryptocurrency taxation, depending on factors such as the status of the trader and the type of transaction.
- 2023:The EU adopted the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) Regulation, establishing a uniform regulatory framework for crypto-assets, their issuers and service providers across the EU.
Endnote
Slovenia’s approach to the cryptocurrency sector is commendable, reflecting its optimistic view of the future of cryptocurrencies. The country’s balanced regulatory framework supports cryptocurrency innovation while protecting users’ rights and preventing illegal activities. Recent developments demonstrate Slovenia’s commitment to continually improving its regulatory environment. Slovenia’s cryptocurrency regulatory framework sets a positive example for other nations navigating the evolving cryptocurrency landscape.
Read also : Hong Kong Cryptocurrency Regulations 2024
Regulation
A Blank Sheet for Cryptocurrencies: Kamala Harris’ Regulatory Opportunity
photo by Shubham Dhage on Unsplash
As the cryptocurrency landscape continues to evolve, the need for clear regulation has never been more pressing.
With Vice President Kamala Harris now leading the charge on digital asset regulation in the United States, this represents a unique opportunity to start fresh. This fresh start can foster innovation and protect consumers. It can also pave the way for widespread adoption across industries, including real estate agencies, healthcare providers, and online gaming platforms like these. online casinos ukAccording to experts at SafestCasinoSites, these platforms come with benefits such as bonus offers, a wide selection of games, and various payment methods. Ultimately, all this increase in adoption could propel the cryptocurrency market forward.
With this in mind, let’s look at the current state of cryptocurrency regulation in the United States, a complex and confusing landscape. Multiple agencies, including the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), have overlapping jurisdictions, creating a fragmented regulatory environment. This lack of clarity has stifled innovation as companies are reluctant to invest in the United States, fearing regulatory repercussions. A coherent and clear regulatory framework is urgently needed to realize the full potential of cryptocurrencies in the United States.
While the US struggles to find its footing, other countries, such as Singapore and the UK, are actively looking into the cryptocurrency sector by adopting clear and supportive regulatory frameworks. This has led to a brain drain, with companies choosing to locate in more conducive environments.
Vice President Kamala Harris has a unique opportunity to change that narrative and start over. Regulation of cryptocurrencies. By taking a comprehensive and inclusive approach, it can help create a framework that balances consumer protection with innovation and growth. The time has come for clear and effective regulation of cryptocurrencies in the United States.
Effective regulation of digital assets is essential to foster a safe and innovative environment. The key principles guiding this regulation are clarity, innovation, global cooperation, consumer protection, and flexibility. Clear definitions and guidelines eliminate ambiguity while encouraging experimentation and development to ensure progress. Collaboration with international partners establishes consistent standards, preventing regulatory arbitrage. Strong safeguards protect consumers from fraud and market abuse, and adaptability allows for evolution in response to emerging trends and technologies, striking a balance between innovation and protection.
The benefits of effective cryptocurrency regulation are multiple and far-reaching. By establishing clear guidelines, governments can attract investors and mainstream users, driving growth and adoption. This can, in turn, position countries like the United States as global leaders in fintech and innovation. Strong safeguards will also increase consumer confidence in digital assets and related products, increasing economic activity.
A thriving crypto industry can contribute significantly to GDP and job creation, which has a positive impact on the overall economy. Furthermore, effective regulation has paved the way for the growth of many businesses such as tech startups, online casinos, and pharmaceutical companies, demonstrating that clear guidelines can open up new opportunities without stifling innovation. This is a great example of how regulation can allay fears of regressive policies, even if Kamala Harris does not repeal the current progressive approach. By adopting effective regulation, governments can create fertile ground for the crypto industry to thrive, thereby promoting progress and prosperity.
Regulation
South Korea Imposes New ‘Monitoring’ Fees on Cryptocurrency Exchanges
Big news! The latest regulatory changes in South Korea are expected to impact major cryptocurrency exchanges like Upbit and Bithumb. Under the updated regulations, these platforms will now have to pay monitoring fees, which could cause problems for some exchanges.
Overview of new fees
In the latest move to regulate cryptocurrencies, the Financial Services Commission announced on July 1 the revised “Enforcement Order of the Act on the Establishment of the Financial Services Commission, etc.” update “Regulations on the collection of contributions from financial institutions, etc.” According to local legislation newsThe regulations require virtual asset operators to pay supervisory fees for inspections conducted by the Financial Supervisory Service starting next year. The total fees for the four major exchanges are estimated at around 300 million won, or about $220,000.
Apportionment of costs
Upbit, which holds a dominant market share, is expected to bear more than 90% of the total fee, or about 272 million won ($199,592) based on its operating revenue. Bithumb will pay about 21.14 million won ($155,157), while Coinone and GOPAX will contribute about 6.03 million won ($4,422) and 830,000 won ($608), respectively. Korbit is excluded from this fee due to its lower operating revenue.
Impact on the industry
The supervision fee will function similarly to a quasi-tax for financial institutions subject to inspections by the Financial Supervisory Service. The new law requires any company with a turnover of 3 billion won or more to pay the fee.
In the past, fees for electronic financial companies and P2P investment firms were phased in over three years. However, the taxation of virtual asset operators has been accelerated, reflecting the rapid growth of the cryptocurrency market and increasing regulatory scrutiny.
Industry reactions
The rapid introduction of the fee was unexpected by some industry players, who had expected a delay. Financial Supervisory Service officials justified the decision by citing the creation of the body concerned and the costs already incurred.
While larger exchanges like Upbit and Bithumb can afford the cost, smaller exchanges like Coinone and GOPAX, which are currently operating at a loss, could face an additional financial burden. This is part of a broader trend of declining trading volumes for South Korean exchanges, which have seen a 30% drop since the new law went into effect.
-
Regulation7 months ago
Ripple CTO and Cardano founder clash over XRP’s regulatory challenges ⋆ ZyCrypto
-
Regulation5 months ago
Nancy Pelosi Considers Supporting Republican Crypto Bill FIT21 – London Business News
-
Videos6 months ago
Cryptocurrency News: Bitcoin, ETH ETF, AI Crypto Rally, AKT, TON & MORE!!
-
Regulation6 months ago
Bitcoin’s future is ‘bleak’ and ripe for regulation, says lead developer
-
News6 months ago
The trader earned $46 million with PEPE after reaching a new ATH
-
Blockchain6 months ago
Solana ranks the fastest blockchain in the world, surpassing Ethereum, Polygon ⋆ ZyCrypto
-
Blockchain6 months ago
Solana Surpasses Ethereum and Polygon as the Fastest Blockchain ⋆ ZyCrypto
-
Regulation6 months ago
🔒 Crypto needs regulation to thrive: Tyler Cowen
-
Videos6 months ago
Who Really CONTROLS THE MARKETS!! Her plans REVEALED!!
-
Videos7 months ago
Kucoin safe?? Exchange REVIEW and beginner’s guide!!
-
Blockchain6 months ago
“Liquid vesting” is an oxymoronic feature of blockchain that allows early investors to sell without waiting
-
Videos6 months ago
Institutions purchasing MEMECOINS?! Everything you need to know!