Regulation
The Latest 2024 Regulatory Requirements for Digital Assets Exchanges and VASPs in Nigeria – BitKE
The SEC, as the authorized entity, oversees the regulation of virtual and digital assets within Nigeria’s capital markets, encompassing both categories under its jurisdiction.
Below are the latest regulatory requirements for virtual assets service providers (VASPs) looking to operate in Nigeria.
2.2.1. General Registration Requirements for VASPs
2.2.1.1. Eligibility Criteria
(a) Companies seeking to operate as VASPs in Nigeria must now first be incorporated with the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC) and have a registered office in Nigeria. The Chief Executive Officer (CEO)/Managing Director (MD) or its equivalent shall be resident in Nigeria (As introduced by the Proposed SEC Rules 2024).
(b) No person or entity shall provide any virtual assets service unless first registered with the SEC (As introduced by the Proposed SEC Rules 2024).
(c) Existing Capital Market Operators (CMOs) registered to provide trading, offering platforms, and custodial services seeking registration under these Rules may be required to establish a subsidiary/separate entity to take up the function (As introduced by the Proposed SEC Rules 2024).
(d) The initial position that VASPs could simply have an office in Nigeria managed by a Director of the company is no longer tenable. (As introduced by the Proposed SEC Rules 2024).
2.2.1.2. Required Documentation for VASPs
An application for registration as a VASP must be filed on the appropriate SEC Form contained in the applicable Schedule to the SEC’s Rules and Regulations. The form must be accompanied by the following documents:
- (A sworn undertaking that the applicant will be able to carry out its obligations as set out under these Rules;
- A sworn undertaking that the information or document that is furnished by the applicant to the SEC is not false or misleading nor does it contain any material omission;
- Evidence that the applicant is not in the course of being wound up or otherwise dissolved;
- Evidence that no receiver manager or an equivalent person has been appointed within or outside Nigeria, or in respect of any property of the applicant;
- A sworn undertaking that the applicant has not, whether within or outside Nigeria, entered into a compromise or scheme of arrangement with its creditors, being a compromise or scheme of arrangement that is still in operation;
- Evidence that the applicant, applicant’s directors, chief executive, controller, and any person who is primarily responsible for its operations or financial management are fit and proper, taking into account the following:
(i) That they are suitably qualified to assume the position, including having the relevant experience and track record in managing a business and not;
(1) been convicted, whether within or outside Nigeria, of an offence involving fraud or other dishonesty or violence or the conviction of which involved a finding that he acted fraudulently or dishonestly:
(2) been convicted of an offence under the securities laws or any law within or outside Nigeria relating to capital market;
(3) contravened any rules of a registered Exchange, registered clearing house, depository or a registered self-regulatory organisation;
(4) contravened any provision made by or under any written law whether within or outside Nigeria appearing to the SEC to be enacted for protecting members of the public against financial loss due to dishonesty, incompetence or malpractice by persons concerned in the provision of financial services or the management of companies or against financial loss due to the conduct of discharged or undischarged bankrupts;
(5) engaged in any business practices appearing to the Commission to be deceitful, oppressive or otherwise improper, whether unlawful or not, or which otherwise reflect discredit on his method of conducting business;
(6) engaged in or has been associated with any other business practices or otherwise conducted himself in such a way as to cast doubt on his competence and soundness of judgement; or
(7) engaged in or has been associated with any conduct that cast doubt on his or her ability to act in the best interest of investors, having regard to his or her reputation, character, financial integrity and reliability.
(ii) Evidence that there are no other circumstances which are likely to –
- lead to the improper conduct of operations by the applicant or by any of its directors, chief executive, controller or any person who is primarily responsible for the operations or financial management of the applicant; or
- reflect discredit in the manner it operates its business.
(g) Submit a business model which has a clear or unique value proposition or will contribute to the overall development of the capital market;
(h) Submit the rules of the entity it seeks to operate and make satisfactory provisions –
- for the protection of investors and public interest;
- to ensure proper functioning of the entity; to promote fairness and transparency;
- to manage any conflict of interest that may arise;
- to promote fair treatment of its users or any person who subscribes for its services;
- to promote fair treatment of any person who is hosted, or applies to be hosted, on its platform;
- to ensure proper regulation and supervision of its users, or any person utilising or accessing its platform, including suspension and expulsion of such users or persons; and
- to provide an avenue of appeal against the decision of the VASP;
(i) Evidence that the applicant will be able to take appropriate action against a person in breach including directing the person in breach to take any necessary remedial measure;
(j) Evidence that the applicant will be able to manage risks associated with its business and operation including demonstrating the processes and contingency arrangement in the event the applicant is unable to carry out its operations;
(k) Evidence that the applicant has sufficient financial, human and other resources for its operation, at all times; and
(l) Evidence that the applicant has appropriate security arrangements which include maintaining a secured environment pursuant to the SEC’s Rules on Technology Risk Management.
2.2.2. General Registration Requirements for DAXs
In addition to the general requirements for VASPs as outlined above, an applicant seeking to register as a DAX Operator must comply with the following requirements:
2.2.2.1 Eligibility Criteria
(a) Payment of Prescribed Fees:
(i) Filing/Application Fee – N300,000 (Three Hundred Thousand Naira only) (Formerly N100,000 (One Hundred Thousand Naira) but now increased by the Proposed SEC Rules 2024)
(ii) Processing Fee – N1,000,000 (One Million Naira) (Formerly N300,000 (Three Hundred Thousand Naira) but now increased by the Proposed SEC Rules 2024)
(iii) Registration Fee – N150,000,000 (One Hundred and Fifty Million Naira) (Formerly N30,000,000 (Thirty Million Naira) but now increased by the Proposed SEC Rules 2024)
(iv) Sponsored Individuals Fee – N300,000 per individual (Three Hundred Thousand Naira) (Formerly N100,000 (One Hundred Thousand Naira) but now increased by the Proposed SEC Rules 2024)
(b) Proof of Minimum Paid-Up Capital and Fidelity Bond
(i) Evidence of required minimum paid up capital of N1,000,000,000 (One Billion Naira) subject to verification of the sources of the funds (Formerly N500,000,000 (Five Hundred Million Naira but now increased by the Proposed SEC Rules 2024);
(ii) Current Fidelity Bond covering at least 25% of the minimum paid up capital as stipulated by the Commission’s Rules and Regulations;
(iii) The Commission may at any time impose additional financial requirements or other terms and conditions on the DAX Operator that commensurate with the nature, operations and risks posed by the DAX Operator;
(iv) All funds shall be made through Real-Time Gross Settlement (RTGS).
Regarding prescribed fees and minimum paid-up capital, apparently, by the proposed amendments, the SEC seeks to increase the application, processing, registration, and sponsored individuals fees. This increment is significantly up by about 300% generally and by 500% for registration fee.
Apart from the devaluation as well as the depreciation of the local currency, the Nigerian Naira (NGN), being a possible reason for these proposed increments, the SEC may also have considered the need to further limit risks in the market by raising the bar on prudential requirements. In other words, the bigger the VASP, the safer it will be for customers. Think of this as the whale. While this may not always be the case, it is valid.
But are the proposed amendments on fees and prudential requirements sound, especially for local DAX operators who may not have the capacity—relative to their foreign counterparts—to meet these financial and prudential requirements? Maybe not, and maybe yes, depending on where one stands. Generally, one would expect that before considering consolidation in the market, the regulator will allow the market to legally operate first. Besides, the prescribed fee of N150,000,000 as registration fee is 5 times bigger than SEC’s present prescribed registration fee for securities exchanges in the traditional capital market.
However one sees it, one consideration merits attention: The need for potentially affected VASPs to start considering—if not already on the table—strategic partnerships and mergers & acquisitions (M&As). In this emerging market, it will be a marathon, not a sprint.
2.2.2.2. Required Documentation
An application for registration of a DAX is required to be made on the appropriate SEC form and must be accompanied by the following:
(a) Completed duplicates of the following forms:
(i) Form SEC 2 – Application Form for Registration of Sponsored Individuals under the ISA 2007; and
(ii) Form SEC 2D – Form for Fit and Proper Persons (Sponsored Individuals, Directors/Partners) for Registration in the Capital Market under the ISA 2007.
The forms are to be completed by all principal officers (Managing Director (MD)/Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and other Directors) and sponsored individuals/ compliance officers of the DAX in duplicates. Sponsored individuals and compliance officers for purposes of this registration are the principal officers and/or professionals held out by the applicant DAX as experts and on whose advice or actions investors are expected to rely. A DAX is required to register a minimum of four (4) sponsored individuals with the SEC, two of which must be the MD/CEO and the Compliance Officer of the DAX.
(b) A copy each of the following, duly certified by the CAC:
(i) Certificate of Incorporation (original to be sighted);
(ii) Memorandum and Articles of Association which shall include the power to perform the specified function;
(iii) CAC Form(s) showing Statement of Share Capital, Return of Allotment, and Particulars of Directors;
(iv) Latest audited accounts or audited statement of affairs of the company in the case of a new company.
(c) A sworn undertaking that the applicant will be able to operate an orderly, fair and transparent market in relation to the securities including derivatives that are offered or traded, on or through its platform (As introduced by the Proposed SEC Rules 2024);
(d) A sworn undertaking to keep proper records and render returns as may be specified by the SEC from time to time, signed by a director or the company secretary;
(e) A sworn undertaking by a director or the company secretary, to abide by SEC Rules and Regulations and Investments and Securities Act No. 29 of 2007 as may be amended from time to time;
(f) Before a DAX Operator can commence operations, the SEC may require the following documents:
(i) Evidence of Information Technology (IT) assurance regarding the system readiness and;
(ii) A written declaration by its internal auditor confirming that it has:
-
-
- Sufficient human, financial and other resources to carry out operations;
- Adequate security measures, systems capacity, business continuity plan and procedures, risk management, data integrity and confidentiality, record keeping and audit trail, for daily operations and to meet emergencies;
- Sufficient IT and technical support arrangements; and
- A Chief Information Security Officer to ensure amongst other things, that cyber risks are adequately mitigated.
-
(g) Such other documents that may be required by the SEC from time to time to be necessary for registration.
3.0. Operational Requirements and Obligations for DAXs
In addition to the above-listed requirements for the registration of DAXs, the following are operational requirements and obligations for DAXs as stipulated by the SEC which may affect its continued registration:
3.1. General Obligations of DAXs:
A DAX shall ensure the following:
(a) Monitor and ensure compliance of its rules;
(b) Ensure fair treatment of its users; ensure that all disclosures are accurate, clear and not misleading;
(c) Obtain and retain self-declared risk acknowledgement forms from its users prior to them investing through a DAX;
(d) Provide a conspicuous disclaimer on its platform informing investors that any loss resulting from the investors trading or investment through the DAX is not covered by any protection fund;
(e) Ensure that all fees and charges payable are fair, reasonable and transparent;
(f) Ensure that the same account holder is not on both sides of the same transaction (As introduced by the Proposed SEC Rules 2024);
(g) Ensure that investors only invest or trade in virtual or digital assets hosted on its platform using Naira. The rate for conversion of foreign currency denominated assets shall be the official exchange rate as published by the CBN (As introduced by the Proposed SEC Rules 2024);
(h) Ensure that it does not engage in any business practices that appears to be deceitful, oppressive or improper (whether unlawful or not) to the SEC or which otherwise reflect discredit on applicant’s method of conducting business;
(i) Carry out continuous awareness and education programmes;
(j) Have in place adequate policies, procedures and controls to mitigate against money laundering, terrorism financing and counter proliferation financing requirements and comply with Anti Money Laundering/Combating Financing of Terrorism and Countering Proliferation Financing laws and regulations;
(k) Disclose and display prominently on its platform, any relevant information relating to the DAX such as –
(i) All necessary risk warning statements, including all risk factors that users may require in making a decision to participate on the platform;
(ii) Information on rights of investors relating to investing or trading on the Exchange;
(iii) Criteria for access to the Exchange;
(iv) Education materials, including comparative information where necessary;
(v) Fees, charges and other expenses that it may charge, impose on its users;
(vi) Information about complaints handling or dispute resolution and its procedures;
(vii) Information on processes and contingency arrangement in the event the DAX is unable to carry out its operations or cessation of business;
(viii) And any other information as may be specified by the SEC.
3.2. Corporate Governance Requirements
(a) SEC-Approved Board: A DAX is required to have a Board whose appointment shall be subject to approval of the SEC.
(b) SEC-Approved Appointment of Chief Executive and Principal Officers
(i) The Chief Executive Officer of a DAX shall hold office for a period of five (5) years in the first instance and may be re-appointed for a further period of five (5) years and no more;
(ii) The appointment of a Chief Executive Officer and Principal Officers of a DAX shall be subject to the prior approval of the SEC;
(iii) The Chief Executive Officer and other Principal Officers of a DAX shall:
-
-
- be registered by the SEC as Sponsored Individuals;
- be persons of proven integrity with no record of criminal conviction;
- hold at least a university degree or its equivalent;
- have at least five (5) years cognate experience;
- not have been found complicit in the operation of an institution that has failed or been declared bankrupt or has had its operating licence revoked as a result of mismanagement or corporate governance abuses;
- not have been found liable for financial impropriety or any other misdemeanour by any court, panel, regulatory agency or any professional body or previous employer;
- comply with any other criteria which the SEC may, in the public interest, determine from time to time.
-
c. Outsourcing Board
The DAX Operator must have a Board that is accountable for all outsourced functions. The Board shall be responsible for the following:
(i) Establish policies and procedures for outsourcing arrangements, including a monitoring framework to track service provider performance;
(ii) Ensure the service provider has adequate policies/procedures to monitor any sub-contractors;
(iii) Periodically assess service providers as part of monitoring and report assessments to the Board/senior management;
(iv) Obtain a sworn undertaking from providers/subcontractors allowing the SEC access to all relevant information/records; and
(v) Notify the SEC within 2 weeks of any adverse development in an outsourcing arrangement that could significantly impact the DAX’s operations.
3.3. Reporting Requirements
A DAX Operator shall submit to the SEC the following:
(a) Weekly and monthly trading statistics and all reporting requirements;
(b) Quarterly and annual financial as well as compliance reports to demonstrate its compliance with any conditions imposed by the SEC pursuant to the registration of the DAX operator;
(c) Its latest audited financial statements, within three months after the close of each financial year or such period that the SEC may allow; and
(d) Any information required by the SEC.
3.4. Requirements for DAXs to Trade Virtual Assets/Digital Tokens
(a) No DAX Operator shall facilitate the trading of any virtual/digital asset unless the SEC has issued a “no objection” to the trading of the virtual/digital asset.
(b) The issuance of virtual asset/digital token shall comply with the relevant Rules issued by the SEC. Such virtual asset/digital token would require approval from the SEC before being traded on any DAX.
(c) In relation to trading of such assets, a DAX is required to submit an application to the SEC enclosing relevant documents and any other information to be determined by the SEC from time to time;
(d) A DAX must demonstrate availability of information related to the project, including but not limited to –
(i) The whitepaper or any other disclosure document accompanying the virtual/digital Asset;
(ii) The progress of the project including both business and technical aspects;
(iii) Compliance with all other legal and regulatory frameworks in Nigeria and other jurisdictions where the project operates in;
(iv) Security of the underlying distributed ledger, including but not limited to –
- The number of nodes;
- Any history of hacks and other forms of attacks; and any known security vulnerabilities.
(e) A DAX Operator must –
(i) ensure that its platform is operating in an orderly, fair and transparent manner;
(ii) have in place rules and procedures for the trading, clearing and settlement of virtual assets/digital tokens on the platform; and
(iii) conduct real-time market surveillance.
3.5. Internal Audit Requirements
A DAX Operator is required to establish an internal audit function to develop, implement and maintain an appropriate internal audit framework commensurate with its business and operations.
3.6. Risk Management Requirements
A DAX Operator must identify and mitigate operational risks (internal and external) through implementing a robust operational risk management framework with appropriate systems, policies, procedures, and controls. This includes defining clear roles/responsibilities for addressing risk, setting operational reliability objectives and policies to achieve them, ensuring adequate capacity to meet service levels under stress volumes, and implementing comprehensive physical and information security policies to address vulnerabilities/threats.
See also
3.7. Asset Protection Requirements
A DAX Operator must ensure the following –
(a) Establish systems and controls for maintaining accurate and up-to-date records of investors and any monies or virtual assets/digital tokens held in relation thereto;
(b) Ensure investors monies and virtual assets/digital tokens are properly safeguarded from conversion or inappropriate use by any person, including but not limited to implementing multi-signature arrangements;
(c) Establish and maintain with a registered Central Securities Depository or Trustee, one or more Central Securities Depositories or trust accounts, designated for the monies received from investors;
(d) Ensure that the Central Securities Depository or trust accounts are administered by an independent registered Central Securities Depository or trustee;
(e) Establish and maintain a sufficiently and verifiably secured storage medium designated to store virtual assets/digital tokens from investors; and
(f) In relation to investors’ virtual assets/digital tokens, have arrangements and processes in place to protect against the risk of loss, theft or hacking.
3.8. Settlement and Custody Requirements
A DAX Operator must:
(a) ensure there are orderly, clear and efficient clearing and arrangements; settlement;
(b) ensure these arrangements include prior or upfront deposit of monies and virtual assets/digital tokens with the DAX Operator before entering into a transaction on the DAX; and
(c) provide clear and certain final intraday settlement.
3.9. Record Keeping Obligations
A DAX is required to maintain records of all transactions and activities executed on its platform in a form and manner to be determined by the SEC from time to time.
3.10. Transaction Fees Requirements
(a) The SEC shall charge fees on transaction carried cut virtual assets/digital tokens traded on a DAX at a rate or percentage to be determined by the SEC from time to time.
(b) All transaction fees payable to DAX by its users shall be subject to approval of the SEC.
3.11. Anti-Money Laundering, Countering the Financing of Terrorism and Countering Proliferation Financing (AML/CFT/CPF) Obligations of DAXs
A most critical area of compliance for DAXs operating in Nigeria is the implementation of robust anti-money laundering, countering the financing of terrorism, and countering proliferation financing (AML/CFT/CPF) measures. The anonymity and decentralised nature of digital assets have raised concerns about their potential misuse for illicit activities, such as money laundering, terrorist financing, and the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. As a result, the SEC has placed a strong emphasis on ensuring that VASPs such as DAXs have adequate AML/CFT/CPF controls to mitigate these risks and comply with relevant laws and regulations. Some of these obligations include the following:
(a) Adoption of AML/CFT/CPF Policies: A DAX is required to adopt policies stating its commitment to comply with AML/CFT/CPF obligations under the law. This will ensure the prevention of any transaction that facilitates criminal activities on the DAX platform.
(b) Assignment of a Designated AML/CFT/CPF Chief Compliance Officer: A DAX is required to have a designated AML/CFT/CPF Chief Compliance Officer with relevant competence, authority, and operational independence to implement the AML/CFT/CPT policies of the platform. Such an officer is also to be registered with the SEC as a sponsored individual and must satisfy the fit and proper persons’ requirement set out by the SEC.
(c) Identification and Filing of Suspicious Transactions Reports (STRs) to the Nigerian Financial Intelligence Unit (NFIU): DAXs are tasked with the identification and the reporting of any suspicious transactions derived from activities such as terrorism and terrorist financing, trafficking in human beings and migrant smuggling, sexual exploitation including sexual exploitation of children, illicit arms trafficking, illicit trafficking in stolen and other goods, corruption and bribery, and fraud, among others to the NFIU.
(d) Conduct of Customer Due Diligence (CDD): From the moment the life cycle of a client’s (private individual clients, quasi-corporate clients, corporate clients, and other institutions) business relationship begins with a DAX till the end of such relationship, a DAX is required to conduct risk-sensitive CDD measures on that client. Where the client is classified as high risk, the DAX is to adopt an enhanced CDD (ECDD) process and apply greater caution. All virtual asset transfers are treated as cross-border transfers and should automatically be treated as high risk by the DAX. Where the DAX cannot perform CDD on a client, it must consider filing an STR to the NFIU in respect of such a client.[/efn_note] All virtual asset transfers are treated as cross-border transfers and should automatically be treated as high risk by the DAX. In addition to this, the DAX is required to put in place appropriate risk-management systems to determine whether a potential client, existing client, or the beneficial owner of the digital asset is a politically exposed person (PEP).
(e) Compliance with Travel Rule Requirements: Originator and beneficiary VASPs must obtain and hold full, accurate, and available originator and beneficiary information. Full beneficiary and originator information must contain:
(i) the full name of the originator;
(ii) the originator’s wallet address;
(iii) the physical address or national identity number of the originator. Where the originator is not a natural person, the incorporation number or business registration number;
(iv) the name of the beneficiary; and
(v) the beneficiary’s wallet address.
For transactions below $1,000, DAXs must ensure that all such transfers include the name of the originator, the name of the beneficiary, and the wallet address for each.Regulation 15(6) of the Securities and Exchange Commission (Capital Market Operators Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism) Regulations, 2022
(f) Comprehensive Employee Education and Training Programme: DAXs must design comprehensive employee-training programs to ensure awareness of AML/CFT/CPF obligations and equip employees with relevant skills. The training content and timing should be tailored to the DAX’s specific needs under the guidance of the AML/CFT/CPF Chief Compliance Officer and top management, and should cover the following:
(i) AML/CFT/CPF laws, regulations and offences
(ii) Nature of money laundering, terrorism financing, proliferation financing
(iii) AML/CFT/CPF red flags, suspicious transactions, typologies, virtual assets and emerging trends
(iv) Reporting requirements
(v) Customer due diligence (CDD)
(vi) Risk-based approach to to AML/CFT/CPF
(vii) Record keeping and retention requirements
All DAXs must submit their annual AML/CFT/CPF employee training program to the SEC by 31 December of every financial year for the upcoming year.
(g) Performance of Know Your Customer (KYC) and Identification Procedures: A DAX is not to establish any relationship with a client until all relevant parties have been identified through the submission of relevant information and the nature of the business to be conducted has been ascertained. Sufficient information on the nature of the business relationship include:
(i) the purpose and reason for opening the account or establishing the relationship;
(ii) the nature of the activity that is to be undertaken;
(iii) the expected origin of the funds to be used during the relationship; and
(iv) the details of occupation, employment, business activities and sources of wealth or income.
A DAX is to establish and independently validate information for all private individuals whose identities need to be verified. The client’s identity, address, and other available information should be checked physically or electronically through databases and directories. This requirement extends to all other types of clients who may establish business relationships with the DAX.
(h) Record Keeping: A DAX is mandated to keep and preserve all necessary records related to transactions and business relationships for at least five years.
4.0 Other Relevant Regulatory Bodies to DAX Operations in Nigeria
Although the SEC is the primary regulatory body for DAXs, the laws and regulations released by several other relevant regulatory bodies may apply to DAXs. Where applicable, they must be complied with to ensure complete coverage under the law. These bodies include:
(a) the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) as it relates to the prevention of financial crimes in DAXs;
(b) the NFIU as it relates to financial intelligence and money laundering monitoring requirements in a DAX;
(c) the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) as it relates to corporate-tax obligations of the DAX;
(d) the Nigerian Data Protection Bureau (NDPB) as it relates to data control and processing requirements to be observed by DAXs in their operations;
(e) the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC) as it relates to consumer protection and competition law; and
(f) the Advertising Regulatory Council of Nigeria (ARCON) as it relates to the advertising and marketing activities of the DAX.
This article, authored by Favour Uche, was first published by Infusion Lawyers.
___________________________________________
Related
Regulation
Crypto community gets involved in anti-government protests in Nigeria
Amid the #EndBadGovernanceInNigeria protests in Nigeria, a notable shift is occurring within the country’s cryptocurrency sector. As the general public demands sweeping governance reforms, crypto community leaders are seizing the opportunity to advocate for specific regulatory changes.
Rume Ophi, former secretary of the Blockchain Stakeholders Association of Nigeria (SiBAN), stressed the critical need to integrate crypto-focused demands into the broader agenda of the protests.
Ophi explained the dual benefit of such requirements, noting that proper regulation can spur substantial economic growth by attracting investors and creating job opportunities. Ophi noted, “Including calls for favorable crypto regulations is not just about the crypto community; it’s about leveraging these technologies to foster broader economic prosperity.”
Existing government efforts
In opposition to Ophi’s call for action, Chimezie Chuta, chair of the National Blockchain Policy Steering Committee, presents a different view. He pointed out The Nigerian government continued efforts to nurture the blockchain and cryptocurrency industries.
According to Chuta, the creation of a steering committee was essential to effectively address the needs of the crypto community.
Chuta also highlighted the creation of a subcommittee to harmonize regulations for virtual asset service providers (VASPs). With the aim of streamlining operations and providing clear regulatory direction, the initiative involves cooperation with major organizations including the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN). “Our efforts should mitigate the need for protest as substantial progress is being made to address the needs of the crypto industry,” Chuta said.
A united call for support
The ongoing dialogue between the crypto community and government agencies reflects a complex landscape of negotiations and demands for progress.
While actors like Ophi are calling for more direct action and the inclusion of crypto demands in protest agendas, government figures like Chuta are advocating for recognition of the steps already taken.
As protests continue, the crypto community’s push for regulatory reform highlights a crucial aspect of Nigeria’s broader fight to improve governance and economic policies. Both sides agree that favorable regulations are critical to the successful adoption and implementation of blockchain technologies, signaling a potentially transformative era for Nigeria’s economic framework.
Read also : OKX Exchange Exits Nigerian Market Amid Regulatory Crackdown
Regulation
Cryptocurrency Regulations in Slovenia 2024
Slovenia, a small but highly developed European country with a population of 2.1 million, boasts a rich industrial history that has contributed greatly to its strong economy. As the most economically developed Slavic nation, Slovenia has grown steadily since adopting the euro in 2007. Its openness to innovation has been a key factor in its success in the industrial sector, making it a prime destination for cryptocurrency enthusiasts. Many believe that Slovenia is poised to become a powerful fintech hub in Europe. But does its current regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies support such aspirations?
Let’s explore Slovenia’s cryptocurrency regulations and see if they can propel the country to the forefront of the cryptocurrency landscape. My expectations are positive. What are yours? Before we answer, let’s dig a little deeper.
1. Cryptocurrency regulation in Slovenia: an overview
Slovenia is renowned for its innovation-friendly stance, providing a supportive environment for emerging technologies such as blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Under the Payment Services and Systems Act, cryptocurrencies are classified as virtual assets rather than financial or monetary instruments.
The regulation of the cryptocurrency sector in Slovenia is decentralized. Different authorities manage different aspects of the ecosystem. For example, the Bank of Slovenia and the Securities Market Agency oversee cryptocurrency transactions to ensure compliance with financial laws, including anti-money laundering (AML) and terrorist financing regulations. The Slovenian Act on the Prevention of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing (ZPPDFT-2) incorporates the EU’s 5th Anti-Money Laundering Directive (5MLD) and aligns with the latest FATF recommendations. All virtual currency service providers must register with the Office of the Republic of Slovenia.
2. Cryptocurrency regulation in Slovenia: what’s new?
Several notable developments have taken place this year in the cryptocurrency sector in Slovenia:
July 25, 2024:Slovenia has issued a €30 million on-chain digital sovereign bond, the first of its kind in the EU, with a yield of 3.65%, maturing on 25 November 2024.
May 14, 2024:NiceHash has announced the first Slovenian Bitcoin-focused conference, NiceHashX, scheduled for November 8-9 in Maribor.
3. Explanation of the tax framework for cryptocurrencies in Slovenia
The Slovenian cryptocurrency tax framework provides clear guidelines for individuals and businesses. According to the Slovenian Financial Administration, the tax treatment depends on the status of the trader and the nature of the transaction.
- People:Income earned from cryptocurrencies through employment or ongoing business activities is subject to personal income tax. However, capital gains from transactions or market fluctuations are exempt from tax.
- Companies:Capital gains from cryptocurrency-related activities are subject to a 19% corporate tax. Value-added tax (VAT) generally applies at a rate of 22%, although cryptocurrency transactions that are considered as means of payment are exempt from VAT. Companies are not allowed to limit payment methods to cryptocurrencies alone. Tokens issued during ICOs must follow standard accounting rules and corporate tax law.
4. Cryptocurrency Mining in Slovenia: What You Need to Know
Cryptocurrency mining is not restricted in Slovenia, but income from mining is considered business income and is therefore taxable. This includes rewards from validating transactions and any additional income from mining operations. Both individuals and legal entities must comply with Slovenian tax regulations.
5. Timeline of the development of cryptocurrency regulation in Slovenia
Here is a timeline highlighting the evolution of cryptocurrency regulations in Slovenia:
- 2013:The Slovenian Financial Administration has issued guidelines stating that income from cryptocurrency transactions should be taxed.
- 2017:The Slovenian Financial Administration has provided more detailed guidelines on cryptocurrency taxation, depending on factors such as the status of the trader and the type of transaction.
- 2023:The EU adopted the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) Regulation, establishing a uniform regulatory framework for crypto-assets, their issuers and service providers across the EU.
Endnote
Slovenia’s approach to the cryptocurrency sector is commendable, reflecting its optimistic view of the future of cryptocurrencies. The country’s balanced regulatory framework supports cryptocurrency innovation while protecting users’ rights and preventing illegal activities. Recent developments demonstrate Slovenia’s commitment to continually improving its regulatory environment. Slovenia’s cryptocurrency regulatory framework sets a positive example for other nations navigating the evolving cryptocurrency landscape.
Read also : Hong Kong Cryptocurrency Regulations 2024
Regulation
A Blank Sheet for Cryptocurrencies: Kamala Harris’ Regulatory Opportunity
photo by Shubham Dhage on Unsplash
As the cryptocurrency landscape continues to evolve, the need for clear regulation has never been more pressing.
With Vice President Kamala Harris now leading the charge on digital asset regulation in the United States, this represents a unique opportunity to start fresh. This fresh start can foster innovation and protect consumers. It can also pave the way for widespread adoption across industries, including real estate agencies, healthcare providers, and online gaming platforms like these. online casinos ukAccording to experts at SafestCasinoSites, these platforms come with benefits such as bonus offers, a wide selection of games, and various payment methods. Ultimately, all this increase in adoption could propel the cryptocurrency market forward.
With this in mind, let’s look at the current state of cryptocurrency regulation in the United States, a complex and confusing landscape. Multiple agencies, including the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), have overlapping jurisdictions, creating a fragmented regulatory environment. This lack of clarity has stifled innovation as companies are reluctant to invest in the United States, fearing regulatory repercussions. A coherent and clear regulatory framework is urgently needed to realize the full potential of cryptocurrencies in the United States.
While the US struggles to find its footing, other countries, such as Singapore and the UK, are actively looking into the cryptocurrency sector by adopting clear and supportive regulatory frameworks. This has led to a brain drain, with companies choosing to locate in more conducive environments.
Vice President Kamala Harris has a unique opportunity to change that narrative and start over. Regulation of cryptocurrencies. By taking a comprehensive and inclusive approach, it can help create a framework that balances consumer protection with innovation and growth. The time has come for clear and effective regulation of cryptocurrencies in the United States.
Effective regulation of digital assets is essential to foster a safe and innovative environment. The key principles guiding this regulation are clarity, innovation, global cooperation, consumer protection, and flexibility. Clear definitions and guidelines eliminate ambiguity while encouraging experimentation and development to ensure progress. Collaboration with international partners establishes consistent standards, preventing regulatory arbitrage. Strong safeguards protect consumers from fraud and market abuse, and adaptability allows for evolution in response to emerging trends and technologies, striking a balance between innovation and protection.
The benefits of effective cryptocurrency regulation are multiple and far-reaching. By establishing clear guidelines, governments can attract investors and mainstream users, driving growth and adoption. This can, in turn, position countries like the United States as global leaders in fintech and innovation. Strong safeguards will also increase consumer confidence in digital assets and related products, increasing economic activity.
A thriving crypto industry can contribute significantly to GDP and job creation, which has a positive impact on the overall economy. Furthermore, effective regulation has paved the way for the growth of many businesses such as tech startups, online casinos, and pharmaceutical companies, demonstrating that clear guidelines can open up new opportunities without stifling innovation. This is a great example of how regulation can allay fears of regressive policies, even if Kamala Harris does not repeal the current progressive approach. By adopting effective regulation, governments can create fertile ground for the crypto industry to thrive, thereby promoting progress and prosperity.
Regulation
South Korea Imposes New ‘Monitoring’ Fees on Cryptocurrency Exchanges
Big news! The latest regulatory changes in South Korea are expected to impact major cryptocurrency exchanges like Upbit and Bithumb. Under the updated regulations, these platforms will now have to pay monitoring fees, which could cause problems for some exchanges.
Overview of new fees
In the latest move to regulate cryptocurrencies, the Financial Services Commission announced on July 1 the revised “Enforcement Order of the Act on the Establishment of the Financial Services Commission, etc.” update “Regulations on the collection of contributions from financial institutions, etc.” According to local legislation newsThe regulations require virtual asset operators to pay supervisory fees for inspections conducted by the Financial Supervisory Service starting next year. The total fees for the four major exchanges are estimated at around 300 million won, or about $220,000.
Apportionment of costs
Upbit, which holds a dominant market share, is expected to bear more than 90% of the total fee, or about 272 million won ($199,592) based on its operating revenue. Bithumb will pay about 21.14 million won ($155,157), while Coinone and GOPAX will contribute about 6.03 million won ($4,422) and 830,000 won ($608), respectively. Korbit is excluded from this fee due to its lower operating revenue.
Impact on the industry
The supervision fee will function similarly to a quasi-tax for financial institutions subject to inspections by the Financial Supervisory Service. The new law requires any company with a turnover of 3 billion won or more to pay the fee.
In the past, fees for electronic financial companies and P2P investment firms were phased in over three years. However, the taxation of virtual asset operators has been accelerated, reflecting the rapid growth of the cryptocurrency market and increasing regulatory scrutiny.
Industry reactions
The rapid introduction of the fee was unexpected by some industry players, who had expected a delay. Financial Supervisory Service officials justified the decision by citing the creation of the body concerned and the costs already incurred.
While larger exchanges like Upbit and Bithumb can afford the cost, smaller exchanges like Coinone and GOPAX, which are currently operating at a loss, could face an additional financial burden. This is part of a broader trend of declining trading volumes for South Korean exchanges, which have seen a 30% drop since the new law went into effect.
-
Regulation7 months ago
Ripple CTO and Cardano founder clash over XRP’s regulatory challenges ⋆ ZyCrypto
-
Regulation5 months ago
Nancy Pelosi Considers Supporting Republican Crypto Bill FIT21 – London Business News
-
Videos6 months ago
Cryptocurrency News: Bitcoin, ETH ETF, AI Crypto Rally, AKT, TON & MORE!!
-
Regulation6 months ago
Bitcoin’s future is ‘bleak’ and ripe for regulation, says lead developer
-
News6 months ago
The trader earned $46 million with PEPE after reaching a new ATH
-
Blockchain6 months ago
Solana ranks the fastest blockchain in the world, surpassing Ethereum, Polygon ⋆ ZyCrypto
-
Blockchain6 months ago
Solana Surpasses Ethereum and Polygon as the Fastest Blockchain ⋆ ZyCrypto
-
Regulation6 months ago
🔒 Crypto needs regulation to thrive: Tyler Cowen
-
Videos6 months ago
Who Really CONTROLS THE MARKETS!! Her plans REVEALED!!
-
Videos7 months ago
Kucoin safe?? Exchange REVIEW and beginner’s guide!!
-
Blockchain6 months ago
“Liquid vesting” is an oxymoronic feature of blockchain that allows early investors to sell without waiting
-
Videos6 months ago
Institutions purchasing MEMECOINS?! Everything you need to know!