Connect with us

Regulation

๐Ÿ”’ Crypto needs regulation to thrive: Tyler Cowen

BlockChainBulletin Staff

Published

on

๐Ÿ”’ Crypto needs regulation to thrive: Tyler Cowen

Tyler Cowen argues that thoughtful regulation could legitimize and strengthen the crypto sector. He points to the House’s recent bill to regulate digital assets, placing much of it under the friendlier jurisdiction of the Commodities Futures Trading Commission. Despite opposition from President Biden, bipartisan support for the bill suggests a bright future for crypto innovation in the United States, balancing oversight and growth.

Sign up for your morning brew from BizNews Insider to stay up to date on content that matters. The newsletter will arrive in your inbox at 5:30 a.m. weekdays. Register here.

By Tyler Cowen

Sometimes industries want to be regulated. It is not that they are in favor of all the associated restrictions, but this regulation means legitimization. Simply passing laws limits certain activities as deserving legal protection. ___STEADY_PAYWALL___

Which brings us to crypto. Currently, if a US financial institution issues crypto assets, there is a high risk that the Securities and Exchange Commission will declare them to be securities and regulate them accordingly. Ideally, the SEC would provide a formal definition of what constitutes and what does not constitute a security, and the crypto industry would attempt to circumvent these rules. Instead, through inaction, the SEC allowed a de facto ban on a large portion of cryptocurrencies. In the long term, this undermines democratic ideals of transparency and the rule of law.

The good news is that last week the House of Representatives pass a bill that would establish regulation of digital asset markets. It’s not common for libertarian elements of the American political system to support new laws, but in this case they do. Whatever objections one may have to the details of the bill, it would give the crypto industry a solid legal footing and enable its growth in the United States. The bill would also place much of crypto regulation under the Commodities Futures Trading Commission, which is likely more user-friendly than the SEC.

Until now, no major crypto-related bills had passed either house of Congress. It remains to be seen what the Senate will do, even if it is unlikely that the bill will reach President Joe Biden’s desk, who opposes it, by the end of the year. It should be noted, however, that 71 of the 279 votes of support The majority of the bill in the House came from Democrats. This indicates that crypto regulation is a bipartisan issue, if only because many Americans claim to own crypto assets, 12% to one. estimate.

As for politics details: Is this a good bill? Above all, yes. Without a consistent regulatory framework, the U.S. crypto industry will not be competitive with that of other countries. This harms U.S. innovation potential, encourages some entrepreneurs to expand their operations overseas, and could potentially limit the integration of crypto with traditional financial infrastructure, putting the U.S. financial sector at a disadvantage.

The bill contains a key provision that requires crypto infrastructures to be sufficiently decentralized, at least if such infrastructures are to fall under the jurisdiction of the CFTC rather than the SEC. These decentralized crypto infrastructures, which would include Bitcoin and the Ethereum network, are considered โ€œdigital commoditiesโ€ and enjoy greater freedom. Such assets are not like Apple stock, where the buyer expects a very particular type of corporate responsibility and predictable financial reporting. Thus, the bill states that, for many crypto assets, initial issuance must involve stricter disclosure and regulation, with a role for the SEC. Over time, as the blockchain for this asset became more mature and well-established, regulations eased.

Any particular proposal for such rules will necessarily contain some ambiguities and will be susceptible to manipulation (by companies) or abuse (by regulators). What is considered โ€œadequateโ€ decentralization, for example, is ultimately a subjective question. Nonetheless, this bill appears to be a reasonable starting point for crypto regulation.

The bill also explicitly subjects crypto assets to existing regulations intended to prevent money laundering.

The bill distinguishes stablecoins, which promise redemption for a specified number of dollars, and states that they can be traded through properly regulated intermediaries, although the details of this regulation are explicitly assigned to future legislative and regulatory acts.

This is a drawback because stablecoins are the form of crypto most likely to be fully integrated into traditional financial infrastructures, due to their ease of use for payment. Nonetheless, the passage of this bill would increase, not decrease, the chances of stablecoins being dealt with in a meaningful way in the future.

What are the broader lessons here? First, Congress has been slow to pass meaningful crypto legislation, and many crypto innovators therefore have a low opinion of the United States as a place to operate. Second, when Congress finally manages to write a bill and move it forward, the results may actually be reasonable rather than crazy.

Third and finally, it’s not too late. Crypto is still in its very early years and it is unclear which of its services will prove sustainable. But the opportunity to find out was not lost.

Read also:

ยฉ 2024 Bloomberg LP



Fuente

We are the editorial team of Blockchainbulletin, where seriousness meets clarity in cryptocurrency analysis. With a robust team of finance and blockchain technology experts, we are dedicated to meticulously exploring complex crypto markets with detailed assessments and an unbiased approach. Our mission is to democratize access to knowledge of emerging financial technologies, ensuring they are understandable and accessible to all. In every article on Blockchainbulletin, we strive to provide content that not only educates, but also empowers our readers, facilitating their integration into the financial digital age.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Informaciรณn bรกsica sobre protecciรณn de datos Ver mรกs

  • Responsable: Miguel Mamador.
  • Finalidad:  Moderar los comentarios.
  • Legitimaciรณn:  Por consentimiento del interesado.
  • Destinatarios y encargados de tratamiento:  No se ceden o comunican datos a terceros para prestar este servicio. El Titular ha contratado los servicios de alojamiento web a Banahosting que actรบa como encargado de tratamiento.
  • Derechos: Acceder, rectificar y suprimir los datos.
  • Informaciรณn Adicional: Puede consultar la informaciรณn detallada en la Polรญtica de Privacidad.

Regulation

Crypto community gets involved in anti-government protests in Nigeria

BlockChainBulletin Staff

Published

on

Crypto Community Engages in Nigeria's Governance Protests

Amid the #EndBadGovernanceInNigeria protests in Nigeria, a notable shift is occurring within the countryโ€™s cryptocurrency sector. As the general public demands sweeping governance reforms, crypto community leaders are seizing the opportunity to advocate for specific regulatory changes.

Rume Ophi, former secretary of the Blockchain Stakeholders Association of Nigeria (SiBAN), stressed the critical need to integrate crypto-focused demands into the broader agenda of the protests.

Ophi explained the dual benefit of such requirements, noting that proper regulation can spur substantial economic growth by attracting investors and creating job opportunities. Ophi noted, โ€œIncluding calls for favorable crypto regulations is not just about the crypto community; itโ€™s about leveraging these technologies to foster broader economic prosperity.โ€

Existing government efforts

In opposition to Ophiโ€™s call for action, Chimezie Chuta, chair of the National Blockchain Policy Steering Committee, presents a different view. He pointed out The Nigerian government continued efforts to nurture the blockchain and cryptocurrency industries.

According to Chuta, the creation of a steering committee was essential to effectively address the needs of the crypto community.

Chuta also highlighted the creation of a subcommittee to harmonize regulations for virtual asset service providers (VASPs). With the aim of streamlining operations and providing clear regulatory direction, the initiative involves cooperation with major organizations including the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN). โ€œOur efforts should mitigate the need for protest as substantial progress is being made to address the needs of the crypto industry,โ€ Chuta said.

A united call for support

The ongoing dialogue between the crypto community and government agencies reflects a complex landscape of negotiations and demands for progress.

While actors like Ophi are calling for more direct action and the inclusion of crypto demands in protest agendas, government figures like Chuta are advocating for recognition of the steps already taken.

As protests continue, the crypto communityโ€™s push for regulatory reform highlights a crucial aspect of Nigeriaโ€™s broader fight to improve governance and economic policies. Both sides agree that favorable regulations are critical to the successful adoption and implementation of blockchain technologies, signaling a potentially transformative era for Nigeriaโ€™s economic framework.

Read also : OKX Exchange Exits Nigerian Market Amid Regulatory Crackdown

Fuente

Continue Reading

Regulation

Cryptocurrency Regulations in Slovenia 2024

BlockChainBulletin Staff

Published

on

Cryptocurrency Regulations in Slovenia 2024

Slovenia, a small but highly developed European country with a population of 2.1 million, boasts a rich industrial history that has contributed greatly to its strong economy. As the most economically developed Slavic nation, Slovenia has grown steadily since adopting the euro in 2007. Its openness to innovation has been a key factor in its success in the industrial sector, making it a prime destination for cryptocurrency enthusiasts. Many believe that Slovenia is poised to become a powerful fintech hub in Europe. But does its current regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies support such aspirations?

Letโ€™s explore Sloveniaโ€™s cryptocurrency regulations and see if they can propel the country to the forefront of the cryptocurrency landscape. My expectations are positive. What are yours? Before we answer, letโ€™s dig a little deeper.

1. Cryptocurrency regulation in Slovenia: an overview

Slovenia is renowned for its innovation-friendly stance, providing a supportive environment for emerging technologies such as blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Under the Payment Services and Systems Act, cryptocurrencies are classified as virtual assets rather than financial or monetary instruments.

The regulation of the cryptocurrency sector in Slovenia is decentralized. Different authorities manage different aspects of the ecosystem. For example, the Bank of Slovenia and the Securities Market Agency oversee cryptocurrency transactions to ensure compliance with financial laws, including anti-money laundering (AML) and terrorist financing regulations. The Slovenian Act on the Prevention of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing (ZPPDFT-2) incorporates the EUโ€™s 5th Anti-Money Laundering Directive (5MLD) and aligns with the latest FATF recommendations. All virtual currency service providers must register with the Office of the Republic of Slovenia.

2. Cryptocurrency regulation in Slovenia: whatโ€™s new?

Several notable developments have taken place this year in the cryptocurrency sector in Slovenia:

July 25, 2024:Slovenia has issued a โ‚ฌ30 million on-chain digital sovereign bond, the first of its kind in the EU, with a yield of 3.65%, maturing on 25 November 2024.

May 14, 2024:NiceHash has announced the first Slovenian Bitcoin-focused conference, NiceHashX, scheduled for November 8-9 in Maribor.

3. Explanation of the tax framework for cryptocurrencies in Slovenia

The Slovenian cryptocurrency tax framework provides clear guidelines for individuals and businesses. According to the Slovenian Financial Administration, the tax treatment depends on the status of the trader and the nature of the transaction.

  • People:Income earned from cryptocurrencies through employment or ongoing business activities is subject to personal income tax. However, capital gains from transactions or market fluctuations are exempt from tax.
  • Companies:Capital gains from cryptocurrency-related activities are subject to a 19% corporate tax. Value-added tax (VAT) generally applies at a rate of 22%, although cryptocurrency transactions that are considered as means of payment are exempt from VAT. Companies are not allowed to limit payment methods to cryptocurrencies alone. Tokens issued during ICOs must follow standard accounting rules and corporate tax law.

4. Cryptocurrency Mining in Slovenia: What You Need to Know

Cryptocurrency mining is not restricted in Slovenia, but income from mining is considered business income and is therefore taxable. This includes rewards from validating transactions and any additional income from mining operations. Both individuals and legal entities must comply with Slovenian tax regulations.

5. Timeline of the development of cryptocurrency regulation in Slovenia

Here is a timeline highlighting the evolution of cryptocurrency regulations in Slovenia:

  • 2013:The Slovenian Financial Administration has issued guidelines stating that income from cryptocurrency transactions should be taxed.
  • 2017:The Slovenian Financial Administration has provided more detailed guidelines on cryptocurrency taxation, depending on factors such as the status of the trader and the type of transaction.
  • 2023:The EU adopted the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) Regulation, establishing a uniform regulatory framework for crypto-assets, their issuers and service providers across the EU.

Endnote

Sloveniaโ€™s approach to the cryptocurrency sector is commendable, reflecting its optimistic view of the future of cryptocurrencies. The countryโ€™s balanced regulatory framework supports cryptocurrency innovation while protecting usersโ€™ rights and preventing illegal activities. Recent developments demonstrate Sloveniaโ€™s commitment to continually improving its regulatory environment. Sloveniaโ€™s cryptocurrency regulatory framework sets a positive example for other nations navigating the evolving cryptocurrency landscape.

Read also : Hong Kong Cryptocurrency Regulations 2024

Fuente

Continue Reading

Regulation

A Blank Sheet for Cryptocurrencies: Kamala Harris’ Regulatory Opportunity

BlockChainBulletin Staff

Published

on

A Blank Sheet for Cryptocurrencies: Kamala Harris' Regulatory Opportunity

photo by Shubham Dhage on Unsplash

As the cryptocurrency landscape continues to evolve, the need for clear regulation has never been more pressing.

With Vice President Kamala Harris now leading the charge on digital asset regulation in the United States, this represents a unique opportunity to start fresh. This fresh start can foster innovation and protect consumers. It can also pave the way for widespread adoption across industries, including real estate agencies, healthcare providers, and online gaming platforms like these. online casinos ukAccording to experts at SafestCasinoSites, these platforms come with benefits such as bonus offers, a wide selection of games, and various payment methods. Ultimately, all this increase in adoption could propel the cryptocurrency market forward.

With this in mind, letโ€™s look at the current state of cryptocurrency regulation in the United States, a complex and confusing landscape. Multiple agencies, including the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), have overlapping jurisdictions, creating a fragmented regulatory environment. This lack of clarity has stifled innovation as companies are reluctant to invest in the United States, fearing regulatory repercussions. A coherent and clear regulatory framework is urgently needed to realize the full potential of cryptocurrencies in the United States.

While the US struggles to find its footing, other countries, such as Singapore and the UK, are actively looking into the cryptocurrency sector by adopting clear and supportive regulatory frameworks. This has led to a brain drain, with companies choosing to locate in more conducive environments.

Vice President Kamala Harris has a unique opportunity to change that narrative and start over. Regulation of cryptocurrencies. By taking a comprehensive and inclusive approach, it can help create a framework that balances consumer protection with innovation and growth. The time has come for clear and effective regulation of cryptocurrencies in the United States.

Effective regulation of digital assets is essential to foster a safe and innovative environment. The key principles guiding this regulation are clarity, innovation, global cooperation, consumer protection, and flexibility. Clear definitions and guidelines eliminate ambiguity while encouraging experimentation and development to ensure progress. Collaboration with international partners establishes consistent standards, preventing regulatory arbitrage. Strong safeguards protect consumers from fraud and market abuse, and adaptability allows for evolution in response to emerging trends and technologies, striking a balance between innovation and protection.

The benefits of effective cryptocurrency regulation are multiple and far-reaching. By establishing clear guidelines, governments can attract investors and mainstream users, driving growth and adoption. This can, in turn, position countries like the United States as global leaders in fintech and innovation. Strong safeguards will also increase consumer confidence in digital assets and related products, increasing economic activity.

A thriving crypto industry can contribute significantly to GDP and job creation, which has a positive impact on the overall economy. Furthermore, effective regulation has paved the way for the growth of many businesses such as tech startups, online casinos, and pharmaceutical companies, demonstrating that clear guidelines can open up new opportunities without stifling innovation. This is a great example of how regulation can allay fears of regressive policies, even if Kamala Harris does not repeal the current progressive approach. By adopting effective regulation, governments can create fertile ground for the crypto industry to thrive, thereby promoting progress and prosperity.

Fuente

Continue Reading

Regulation

South Korea Imposes New ‘Monitoring’ Fees on Cryptocurrency Exchanges

BlockChainBulletin Staff

Published

on

South Korea Imposes New 'Monitoring' Fees on Cryptocurrency Exchanges

Big news! The latest regulatory changes in South Korea are expected to impact major cryptocurrency exchanges like Upbit and Bithumb. Under the updated regulations, these platforms will now have to pay monitoring fees, which could cause problems for some exchanges.

Overview of new fees

In the latest move to regulate cryptocurrencies, the Financial Services Commission announced on July 1 the revised โ€œEnforcement Order of the Act on the Establishment of the Financial Services Commission, etc.โ€ update โ€œRegulations on the collection of contributions from financial institutions, etc.โ€ According to local legislation newsThe regulations require virtual asset operators to pay supervisory fees for inspections conducted by the Financial Supervisory Service starting next year. The total fees for the four major exchanges are estimated at around 300 million won, or about $220,000.

Apportionment of costs

Upbit, which holds a dominant market share, is expected to bear more than 90% of the total fee, or about 272 million won ($199,592) based on its operating revenue. Bithumb will pay about 21.14 million won ($155,157), while Coinone and GOPAX will contribute about 6.03 million won ($4,422) and 830,000 won ($608), respectively. Korbit is excluded from this fee due to its lower operating revenue.

Impact on the industry

The supervision fee will function similarly to a quasi-tax for financial institutions subject to inspections by the Financial Supervisory Service. The new law requires any company with a turnover of 3 billion won or more to pay the fee.

In the past, fees for electronic financial companies and P2P investment firms were phased in over three years. However, the taxation of virtual asset operators has been accelerated, reflecting the rapid growth of the cryptocurrency market and increasing regulatory scrutiny.

Industry reactions

The rapid introduction of the fee was unexpected by some industry players, who had expected a delay. Financial Supervisory Service officials justified the decision by citing the creation of the body concerned and the costs already incurred.

While larger exchanges like Upbit and Bithumb can afford the cost, smaller exchanges like Coinone and GOPAX, which are currently operating at a loss, could face an additional financial burden. This is part of a broader trend of declining trading volumes for South Korean exchanges, which have seen a 30% drop since the new law went into effect.

Fuente

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright ยฉ 2024 BLOCKCHAINBULLETIN.ORG. All rights reserved. This website provides educational content and highlights that investing involves risks. It is essential to conduct thorough research before investing and to be prepared to assume potential losses. Be sure to fully understand the risks involved before making investment decisions. Important: We do not provide financial or investment advice. All content is presented for educational purposes only.