Connect with us

Regulation

Legal Expert Explains How US Political Climate Could Redefine Crypto Regulations

BlockChainBulletin Staff

Published

on

Legal expert discusses how US political climate could redefine crypto regulations

Crypto.news recently spoke with Bing Wang, Head of Legal at BasedVC, who shared his views on the political rise of cryptocurrencies and the regulatory transformations ahead.

As the 2024 US elections approach, the political landscape around cryptocurrencies is undergoing major changes.

Surprising alliances form in Congress, with crypto-friendly laws gain bipartisan support. Key figures like Chuck Schumer and former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who traditionally held divergent views, now emerge as unexpected allies.

The Biden administration has begun to show a rediscovered openness with crypto policy, suggesting skeptics like Sen. Elizabeth Warren may soon find themselves isolated.

On the Republican side, former President Donald Trump stepped up its support for the crypto community, committing to protecting digital asset traders and accepting campaign donations in cryptocurrency.

It is clear that the role of cryptocurrencies is expected to be a central issue this year, which could shape the future regulatory landscape of the emerging sector.

Wang believes this change in political dynamics will accelerate the widespread adoption and integration of cryptocurrencies in the United States.

How important do you think the role of cryptocurrencies will be in the 2024 US elections?

Crypto has always played an important role in American politics. The famous case of Sam Bankman-Fried and FTX involved him funneling crypto money to candidates in the US midterm elections. However, the impact on the next elections in 2024 will be disproportionate. With pro-crypto legislation passed by Congress over the past 3 weeks, both Democrats and Republicans are moving toward even further crypto adoption. The elections will have crypto on their agenda, and having positive sentiment towards it will be a key talking point.

The Biden administration has shown a shift in stance on cryptocurrencies, as evidenced by the approval of spot Ether ETFs and engagement with crypto industry experts. How might these changes impact the cryptocurrency industry, and do you think they will address the concerns of crypto enthusiasts who have criticized the administration’s previous policies?

The Biden administration’s sudden change in stance is a major moment in crypto. Some have alleged that this is an attempt to mislead the electorate, but that doesn’t matter because it appears to address long-standing industry concerns. The House has passed a bill to repeal the Securities and Exchange Commission’s crypto guidelines that have caused the regulator to exert negative influence on the market. If signed into law, the new bill will help overhaul crypto oversight by the SEC and CFTC and create a more streamlined guide for crypto regulation. This is a big win for the industry.

Given the bipartisan support for cryptocurrency legislation, such as the Deploying American Blockchains Act and the FIT21 Act, what specific regulatory changes can the crypto community anticipate in the coming years?

Pro-crypto senators are banding together and an attempt to revive previously moribund crypto bills is underway. The Biden campaign has begun discussing digital asset policy with Democratic allies, while Stabenow’s bill to overhaul how the SEC and CFTC share crypto oversight is back on the table. Stablecoin legislation is also being negotiated in the House. The coming years are expected to see a wave of legislation that will attempt to provide a clear path for crypto regulation, something most crypto companies aspire to.

Do you think the government’s engagement with crypto industry experts will help improve public understanding and awareness of cryptocurrency technologies?

Just as the Senate has attempted to collaborate with social media companies like Facebook, TikTok and X (formerly Twitter), stakeholders must come together in roundtables to discuss pressing issues. Avoiding meeting crypto industry experts can only prove detrimental in the long run. As discussions continue, I strongly believe this will help build trust in digital assets.

What do you think about the potential consequences of appointing pro-crypto officials to key regulatory positions?

Well, crypto-friendly officials will generally mean faster decisions and a more positive view of crypto from key decision-makers. I don’t see a clear downside to this decision, except that it will help improve policymaking in the crypto space. Anti-crypto crusades led by ill-informed officials will only simmer over time, and most will have no choice but to buy into the program.

How might changes in US policy impact the growing interest in self-custody and privacy within the crypto community?

Policy changes will have a significant impact on how crypto affects the crypto landscape. Increased scrutiny will undermine the privacy features of some cryptocurrencies, as regulators may require a stricter approach to transaction traceability and transparency. Stricter KYC and AML requirements may be put in place.

And what might be the broader implications for cryptographic security and user autonomy?

This could also lead to development in this area, as better hardware and innovative cryptographic methods could arise from regulatory approaches aimed at improving privacy and security. The downside could be that regulatory measures could cause a divide between the decentralization ideology that cryptos are created for and the centralized custody services of the traditional financial system.

How do you think regulators will respond to the growing demand for privacy and self-custody in the cryptocurrency community?

Regulators have several options for this. First, regulators can embark on educational initiatives to enlighten the public on the best ways to secure their tokens and use privacy-enhancing technologies. Second, startups and crypto companies may be allowed to test regulatory sandboxes for experimental purposes without fully committing to compliance requirements. This could enable testing of privacy and self-custody solutions under supervised conditions. Another approach is to strike a balance between privacy and regulation. Regulators can allow privacy features in cryptocurrencies while balancing them with the mandate to impose control in cases of illicit activities or terrorist financing.

What impact might increased political activism and organizing within the crypto community, such as the formation of crypto-focused PACs, have on the legislative process?

Since Coinbase and its main campaign finance partners, Ripple and Andreessen Horowitz, invested approximately $161 million for the 2024 US elections, the major obstacle, the US legislature, has started to change its tune. Crypto-focused PACs want to increase the number of pro-crypto members, and that is exactly what is being done. The next Senate and House of Representatives are expected to have more pro-crypto lawmakers than ever before. This can only mean one thing: more crypto-positive laws or regulations.

Could growing government support for cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology lead to backlash from the traditional financial sector?

Traditional financial systems already view crypto as a threat. With government support, crypto could top the list of victims. This can take many forms, including regulatory pressure from lobbying legislators, technological resistance by refusing to integrate crypto into their operations, imposing barriers for crypto companies to operate on their platforms, and even public relations campaigns to discourage the public from adopting crypto.

Fuente

We are the editorial team of Blockchainbulletin, where seriousness meets clarity in cryptocurrency analysis. With a robust team of finance and blockchain technology experts, we are dedicated to meticulously exploring complex crypto markets with detailed assessments and an unbiased approach. Our mission is to democratize access to knowledge of emerging financial technologies, ensuring they are understandable and accessible to all. In every article on Blockchainbulletin, we strive to provide content that not only educates, but also empowers our readers, facilitating their integration into the financial digital age.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Información básica sobre protección de datos Ver más

  • Responsable: Miguel Mamador.
  • Finalidad:  Moderar los comentarios.
  • Legitimación:  Por consentimiento del interesado.
  • Destinatarios y encargados de tratamiento:  No se ceden o comunican datos a terceros para prestar este servicio. El Titular ha contratado los servicios de alojamiento web a Banahosting que actúa como encargado de tratamiento.
  • Derechos: Acceder, rectificar y suprimir los datos.
  • Información Adicional: Puede consultar la información detallada en la Política de Privacidad.

Regulation

Crypto community gets involved in anti-government protests in Nigeria

BlockChainBulletin Staff

Published

on

Crypto Community Engages in Nigeria's Governance Protests

Amid the #EndBadGovernanceInNigeria protests in Nigeria, a notable shift is occurring within the country’s cryptocurrency sector. As the general public demands sweeping governance reforms, crypto community leaders are seizing the opportunity to advocate for specific regulatory changes.

Rume Ophi, former secretary of the Blockchain Stakeholders Association of Nigeria (SiBAN), stressed the critical need to integrate crypto-focused demands into the broader agenda of the protests.

Ophi explained the dual benefit of such requirements, noting that proper regulation can spur substantial economic growth by attracting investors and creating job opportunities. Ophi noted, “Including calls for favorable crypto regulations is not just about the crypto community; it’s about leveraging these technologies to foster broader economic prosperity.”

Existing government efforts

In opposition to Ophi’s call for action, Chimezie Chuta, chair of the National Blockchain Policy Steering Committee, presents a different view. He pointed out The Nigerian government continued efforts to nurture the blockchain and cryptocurrency industries.

According to Chuta, the creation of a steering committee was essential to effectively address the needs of the crypto community.

Chuta also highlighted the creation of a subcommittee to harmonize regulations for virtual asset service providers (VASPs). With the aim of streamlining operations and providing clear regulatory direction, the initiative involves cooperation with major organizations including the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN). “Our efforts should mitigate the need for protest as substantial progress is being made to address the needs of the crypto industry,” Chuta said.

A united call for support

The ongoing dialogue between the crypto community and government agencies reflects a complex landscape of negotiations and demands for progress.

While actors like Ophi are calling for more direct action and the inclusion of crypto demands in protest agendas, government figures like Chuta are advocating for recognition of the steps already taken.

As protests continue, the crypto community’s push for regulatory reform highlights a crucial aspect of Nigeria’s broader fight to improve governance and economic policies. Both sides agree that favorable regulations are critical to the successful adoption and implementation of blockchain technologies, signaling a potentially transformative era for Nigeria’s economic framework.

Read also : OKX Exchange Exits Nigerian Market Amid Regulatory Crackdown

Fuente

Continue Reading

Regulation

Cryptocurrency Regulations in Slovenia 2024

BlockChainBulletin Staff

Published

on

Cryptocurrency Regulations in Slovenia 2024

Slovenia, a small but highly developed European country with a population of 2.1 million, boasts a rich industrial history that has contributed greatly to its strong economy. As the most economically developed Slavic nation, Slovenia has grown steadily since adopting the euro in 2007. Its openness to innovation has been a key factor in its success in the industrial sector, making it a prime destination for cryptocurrency enthusiasts. Many believe that Slovenia is poised to become a powerful fintech hub in Europe. But does its current regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies support such aspirations?

Let’s explore Slovenia’s cryptocurrency regulations and see if they can propel the country to the forefront of the cryptocurrency landscape. My expectations are positive. What are yours? Before we answer, let’s dig a little deeper.

1. Cryptocurrency regulation in Slovenia: an overview

Slovenia is renowned for its innovation-friendly stance, providing a supportive environment for emerging technologies such as blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Under the Payment Services and Systems Act, cryptocurrencies are classified as virtual assets rather than financial or monetary instruments.

The regulation of the cryptocurrency sector in Slovenia is decentralized. Different authorities manage different aspects of the ecosystem. For example, the Bank of Slovenia and the Securities Market Agency oversee cryptocurrency transactions to ensure compliance with financial laws, including anti-money laundering (AML) and terrorist financing regulations. The Slovenian Act on the Prevention of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing (ZPPDFT-2) incorporates the EU’s 5th Anti-Money Laundering Directive (5MLD) and aligns with the latest FATF recommendations. All virtual currency service providers must register with the Office of the Republic of Slovenia.

2. Cryptocurrency regulation in Slovenia: what’s new?

Several notable developments have taken place this year in the cryptocurrency sector in Slovenia:

July 25, 2024:Slovenia has issued a €30 million on-chain digital sovereign bond, the first of its kind in the EU, with a yield of 3.65%, maturing on 25 November 2024.

May 14, 2024:NiceHash has announced the first Slovenian Bitcoin-focused conference, NiceHashX, scheduled for November 8-9 in Maribor.

3. Explanation of the tax framework for cryptocurrencies in Slovenia

The Slovenian cryptocurrency tax framework provides clear guidelines for individuals and businesses. According to the Slovenian Financial Administration, the tax treatment depends on the status of the trader and the nature of the transaction.

  • People:Income earned from cryptocurrencies through employment or ongoing business activities is subject to personal income tax. However, capital gains from transactions or market fluctuations are exempt from tax.
  • Companies:Capital gains from cryptocurrency-related activities are subject to a 19% corporate tax. Value-added tax (VAT) generally applies at a rate of 22%, although cryptocurrency transactions that are considered as means of payment are exempt from VAT. Companies are not allowed to limit payment methods to cryptocurrencies alone. Tokens issued during ICOs must follow standard accounting rules and corporate tax law.

4. Cryptocurrency Mining in Slovenia: What You Need to Know

Cryptocurrency mining is not restricted in Slovenia, but income from mining is considered business income and is therefore taxable. This includes rewards from validating transactions and any additional income from mining operations. Both individuals and legal entities must comply with Slovenian tax regulations.

5. Timeline of the development of cryptocurrency regulation in Slovenia

Here is a timeline highlighting the evolution of cryptocurrency regulations in Slovenia:

  • 2013:The Slovenian Financial Administration has issued guidelines stating that income from cryptocurrency transactions should be taxed.
  • 2017:The Slovenian Financial Administration has provided more detailed guidelines on cryptocurrency taxation, depending on factors such as the status of the trader and the type of transaction.
  • 2023:The EU adopted the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) Regulation, establishing a uniform regulatory framework for crypto-assets, their issuers and service providers across the EU.

Endnote

Slovenia’s approach to the cryptocurrency sector is commendable, reflecting its optimistic view of the future of cryptocurrencies. The country’s balanced regulatory framework supports cryptocurrency innovation while protecting users’ rights and preventing illegal activities. Recent developments demonstrate Slovenia’s commitment to continually improving its regulatory environment. Slovenia’s cryptocurrency regulatory framework sets a positive example for other nations navigating the evolving cryptocurrency landscape.

Read also : Hong Kong Cryptocurrency Regulations 2024

Fuente

Continue Reading

Regulation

A Blank Sheet for Cryptocurrencies: Kamala Harris’ Regulatory Opportunity

BlockChainBulletin Staff

Published

on

A Blank Sheet for Cryptocurrencies: Kamala Harris' Regulatory Opportunity

photo by Shubham Dhage on Unsplash

As the cryptocurrency landscape continues to evolve, the need for clear regulation has never been more pressing.

With Vice President Kamala Harris now leading the charge on digital asset regulation in the United States, this represents a unique opportunity to start fresh. This fresh start can foster innovation and protect consumers. It can also pave the way for widespread adoption across industries, including real estate agencies, healthcare providers, and online gaming platforms like these. online casinos ukAccording to experts at SafestCasinoSites, these platforms come with benefits such as bonus offers, a wide selection of games, and various payment methods. Ultimately, all this increase in adoption could propel the cryptocurrency market forward.

With this in mind, let’s look at the current state of cryptocurrency regulation in the United States, a complex and confusing landscape. Multiple agencies, including the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), have overlapping jurisdictions, creating a fragmented regulatory environment. This lack of clarity has stifled innovation as companies are reluctant to invest in the United States, fearing regulatory repercussions. A coherent and clear regulatory framework is urgently needed to realize the full potential of cryptocurrencies in the United States.

While the US struggles to find its footing, other countries, such as Singapore and the UK, are actively looking into the cryptocurrency sector by adopting clear and supportive regulatory frameworks. This has led to a brain drain, with companies choosing to locate in more conducive environments.

Vice President Kamala Harris has a unique opportunity to change that narrative and start over. Regulation of cryptocurrencies. By taking a comprehensive and inclusive approach, it can help create a framework that balances consumer protection with innovation and growth. The time has come for clear and effective regulation of cryptocurrencies in the United States.

Effective regulation of digital assets is essential to foster a safe and innovative environment. The key principles guiding this regulation are clarity, innovation, global cooperation, consumer protection, and flexibility. Clear definitions and guidelines eliminate ambiguity while encouraging experimentation and development to ensure progress. Collaboration with international partners establishes consistent standards, preventing regulatory arbitrage. Strong safeguards protect consumers from fraud and market abuse, and adaptability allows for evolution in response to emerging trends and technologies, striking a balance between innovation and protection.

The benefits of effective cryptocurrency regulation are multiple and far-reaching. By establishing clear guidelines, governments can attract investors and mainstream users, driving growth and adoption. This can, in turn, position countries like the United States as global leaders in fintech and innovation. Strong safeguards will also increase consumer confidence in digital assets and related products, increasing economic activity.

A thriving crypto industry can contribute significantly to GDP and job creation, which has a positive impact on the overall economy. Furthermore, effective regulation has paved the way for the growth of many businesses such as tech startups, online casinos, and pharmaceutical companies, demonstrating that clear guidelines can open up new opportunities without stifling innovation. This is a great example of how regulation can allay fears of regressive policies, even if Kamala Harris does not repeal the current progressive approach. By adopting effective regulation, governments can create fertile ground for the crypto industry to thrive, thereby promoting progress and prosperity.

Fuente

Continue Reading

Regulation

South Korea Imposes New ‘Monitoring’ Fees on Cryptocurrency Exchanges

BlockChainBulletin Staff

Published

on

South Korea Imposes New 'Monitoring' Fees on Cryptocurrency Exchanges

Big news! The latest regulatory changes in South Korea are expected to impact major cryptocurrency exchanges like Upbit and Bithumb. Under the updated regulations, these platforms will now have to pay monitoring fees, which could cause problems for some exchanges.

Overview of new fees

In the latest move to regulate cryptocurrencies, the Financial Services Commission announced on July 1 the revised “Enforcement Order of the Act on the Establishment of the Financial Services Commission, etc.” update “Regulations on the collection of contributions from financial institutions, etc.” According to local legislation newsThe regulations require virtual asset operators to pay supervisory fees for inspections conducted by the Financial Supervisory Service starting next year. The total fees for the four major exchanges are estimated at around 300 million won, or about $220,000.

Apportionment of costs

Upbit, which holds a dominant market share, is expected to bear more than 90% of the total fee, or about 272 million won ($199,592) based on its operating revenue. Bithumb will pay about 21.14 million won ($155,157), while Coinone and GOPAX will contribute about 6.03 million won ($4,422) and 830,000 won ($608), respectively. Korbit is excluded from this fee due to its lower operating revenue.

Impact on the industry

The supervision fee will function similarly to a quasi-tax for financial institutions subject to inspections by the Financial Supervisory Service. The new law requires any company with a turnover of 3 billion won or more to pay the fee.

In the past, fees for electronic financial companies and P2P investment firms were phased in over three years. However, the taxation of virtual asset operators has been accelerated, reflecting the rapid growth of the cryptocurrency market and increasing regulatory scrutiny.

Industry reactions

The rapid introduction of the fee was unexpected by some industry players, who had expected a delay. Financial Supervisory Service officials justified the decision by citing the creation of the body concerned and the costs already incurred.

While larger exchanges like Upbit and Bithumb can afford the cost, smaller exchanges like Coinone and GOPAX, which are currently operating at a loss, could face an additional financial burden. This is part of a broader trend of declining trading volumes for South Korean exchanges, which have seen a 30% drop since the new law went into effect.

Fuente

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 BLOCKCHAINBULLETIN.ORG. All rights reserved. This website provides educational content and highlights that investing involves risks. It is essential to conduct thorough research before investing and to be prepared to assume potential losses. Be sure to fully understand the risks involved before making investment decisions. Important: We do not provide financial or investment advice. All content is presented for educational purposes only.