Blockchain
Komodo CTO on the importance of deflationary tokenomics as an environmental strategy
In an interview with crypto.news, Kadan Stadelmann, CTO of Komodo, describes the need to integrate sustainable practices and deflationary mechanisms to advance the blockchain industry while addressing environmental concerns.
Blockchain technology is at a crossroads where demand for sustainable tokenomics and is growing environmental awareness is reshaping the industry. As the world grapples with climate change, blockchain projects are innovating minimize your ecological footprint.
Deflationary mechanisms, like token burn, are not just financial instruments but are part of a broader strategy to create a greener and more sustainable economic model. It helps manage token supply, creating scarcity and attracting investors who prioritize value and long-term sustainability.
The industry’s focus on token sustainability and efficiency is setting new standards.
Stadelmann believes that the future of blockchain technology depends on the adoption of sustainable and deflationary tokenomics.
Considering the rapid evolution of tokenomic models, especially with the rise of deflationary mechanisms, how do these models influence the long-term value of tokens and investor behavior in the blockchain sector?
Tokenomic models, particularly those that incorporate deflationary mechanisms, have been influential in creating long-term value for cryptocurrency investors. On the other hand, projects that have inflationary tokenomics often create an environment that favors the creators or large holders of the cryptocurrency. Smaller holders, or people just discovering cryptocurrency, are at a disadvantage as they usually fail to accumulate enough supply to influence the market value. Furthermore, for centuries, we have seen the long-term negative effects of fiat currency inflation and hyperinflation in the global economy. Deflationary mechanisms such as block reward reduction (e.g. BTC) or token consumption (e.g. BNB) have historically led to an increase in the market value of cryptocurrencies.
Is Komodo making any moves in this regard?
Recently, the Komodo community has approved three proposals, two of which will lead directly to a more deflationary tokenomic model for KMD. These include KIP0002 (burning 100% of transaction fees and KIP0003 (reducing block reward from 3 KMD to 1 KMD). The other approved proposal – KIP0004 – will transition the Komodo blockchain from Proof of Work (PoW) to Proof of Stake (PoS) ) in 2025 or 2026 (exact date to be defined).
In terms of scalability and operational efficiency, what advantages does the model that supports independent blockchains for each project offer compared to traditional single-chain platforms?
The most important benefit of supporting a multi-chain model, rather than a single-chain model, is the autonomy of crypto projects to shape their own tokenomics. Projects that are based on Ethereum, for example, do not have the ability to reduce the underlying transaction fees (gas) on each transaction. Users must also hold ETH to pay for gas, even if their transaction does not otherwise involve ETH (e.g. exchanging one ERC-20 token for another ERC-20 token on a DEX). For cryptocurrencies that use their own blockchains, there is no need to charge a gas fee or rely on a secondary cryptocurrency. Projects can also set a minimum amount on transaction fees. Scalability is another factor. Since each cryptocurrency has its own blockchain, transaction completion times are generally much shorter due to less mempool congestion. Transaction fees are also typically much more consistent and cheaper.
What architectural innovations are currently leading the way in minimizing environmental impacts in the blockchain development industry? How do these technologies balance scalability with energy efficiency?
From the point of view of environmental sustainability, the biggest innovation is Proof of Stake. As we saw in September 2022, Ethereum’s move to Proof of Stake (PoS) reduced energy consumption by approximately 99.5% compared to Proof of Work (PoW). As a result, the network has also become more scalable. If we look at other PoS-based blockchains, on average they have a much higher transaction per second (TPS) limit than PoW-based blockchains. Another important aspect to consider is that PoS cryptocurrencies make it much easier for average, non-technical users to actively participate in network security and earn block rewards. This leads to higher participation among HODLers and creates a greater incentive to hold for a longer period of time than to sell during adverse market conditions.
How do deflationary strategies like token burning shape market dynamics and token valuation over time in the broader blockchain ecosystem?
It’s simple economics, or tokenomics in this case. In some cases, deflationary strategies such as token burn can contribute to price stability or mitigate downward pressure on prices. By reducing the supply of tokens, these mechanisms help counteract inflationary pressures that could otherwise devalue the token over time. This stability can boost investor confidence and attract more long-term investment. If demand for a specific cryptocurrency remains at least the same or increases over time, deflationary tokenomics should theoretically lead to an increase in prices.
What are the key architectural choices that can help blockchain platforms maintain high throughput and efficiency without compromising security or increasing costs?
There are several potential choices that can help crypto projects achieve high throughput and efficiency. While Proof of Work (PoW) often offers high-level security (especially for large blockchains like Bitcoin), it can be resource-intensive and limit throughput. Proof of Stake (PoS) and variants such as Delegation Proof of Stake (DPoS) offer higher throughput with lower resource requirements but require careful design to ensure security. Scaling solutions such as state channels (e.g. Lightning Network) or sidechains can enable off-chain transaction processing, reducing the load on the main blockchain and increasing throughput. However, they require careful integration with the main chain to maintain security and interoperability.
How crucial is it for blockchain platforms to keep transaction fees low?
The reality is that developers are more likely to rely on a blockchain that allows for cheaper transactions. As a result, users are also more likely to start using various dApps if they are convenient. Blockchains should allow developers to easily design smart contracts that minimize computational complexity and gas consumption. This is possible through techniques such as code optimization, gas-efficient data structures, and off-chain computing. Additionally, dApp developers should consider using pre-compiled contracts for computationally expensive operations.
From an industry-wide perspective, when designing blockchain solutions with a focus on environmental sustainability, what are some of the key considerations that developers should prioritize to ensure their platforms are efficient and have minimal impact?
As stated above, the simplest method is to use PoS. However, if PoW is necessary, consider implementing energy-efficient mining algorithms or variations that reduce computational workload and power consumption. Examples include Equihash (used in Zcash) or Ethash (formerly used in Ethereum). Operating nodes or mining farms prioritize energy-efficient hardware and data center practices. This includes using renewable energy sources and optimizing cooling systems to reduce energy waste. Another solution is to optimize the blockchain protocol and architecture for efficiency. This includes reducing block sizes, optimizing data storage and retrieval, and minimizing unnecessary computations. Efficient data structures and compression techniques can also help reduce your overall energy footprint.
Blockchain
Bitcoin (BTC) Price Crashes as Donald Trump’s Win Odds Dip
Markets received nominally good news on Thursday morning, with the US ISM manufacturing PMI for July falling much more than economists expected, sending interest rates to multi-month lows across the board. Additionally, initial jobless claims in the US jumped to their highest level in about a year. Taken together, the data adds to the sentiment that the US is on the verge of a cycle of monetary easing by the Federal Reserve, which is typically seen as bullish for risk assets, including bitcoin.
Blockchain
Terra Blockchain Reboots After Reentry Attack Leads to $4M Exploit
Please note that our Privacy Policy, terms of use, cookiesAND do not sell my personal information has been updated.
CoinDesk is a awarded press agency that deals with the cryptocurrency sector. Its journalists respect a rigorous set of editorial policiesIn November 2023, CoinDesk has been acquired from the Bullish group, owner of Bullisha regulated digital asset exchange. Bullish Group is majority owned by Block.one; both companies have interests in a variety of blockchain and digital asset businesses and significant digital asset holdings, including bitcoin. CoinDesk operates as an independent subsidiary with an editorial board to protect journalistic independence. CoinDesk employees, including journalists, are eligible to receive options in the Bullish group as part of their compensation.
Blockchain
$6.8M Stolen, ASTRO Collapses 60%
In the latest news in the blockchain industry, there has been a turn of events that has severely affected Terra and its users and investors, with the company losing $6.8 million. The attack, which exploited a reentry vulnerability in the network’s IBC hooks, raises questions about the security measures of the once celebrated blockchain protocol.
A web3 security company, Cyvers Alerts reported that the exploit occurred on July 31st and caused the company to lose 60 million ASTRO, 3.5 million USDC500,000 USDTand 2. 7 BitcoinThe flaw was discovered in April and allows cybercriminals to make payments non-stop by withdrawing money from the network.
Earth’s response
Subsequently, to the hack employed on the Terra blockchain, its official X platform declared the Suspension network operations for a few hours to apply the emergency measure. Finally in its sendTerra’s official account agreed, sharing that its operations are back online: the core transactions that make up the platform are now possible again.
However, the overall value of the various assets lost in the event was unclear.
Market Impact: ASTRO Crashes!
The hack had an immediate impact on the price of ASTRO, which dropped nearly 60% to $0.0206 following the network shutdown. This sharp decline highlights the vulnerability of token prices to security breaches and the resulting market volatility.
This incident is not the first time Terra has faced serious challenges. Earlier this year, the blockchain encountered significant problems that called into question its long-term viability. These repeated incidents underscore the need for stronger security measures to protect users’ assets and maintain trust in the network.
The recent Terra hack serves as a stark reminder of the ongoing security challenges in the blockchain space. As the platform works to regain stability, the broader crypto community will be watching closely.
Read also: Record Cryptocurrency Theft: Over $1 Billion Stolen in 2024
This is a major setback for Terra. How do you think this will impact the blockchain industry?
Blockchain
Luxembourg proposes updates to blockchain laws | Insights and resources
On July 24, 2024, the Ministry of Finance proposed Blockchain Bill IVwhich will provide greater flexibility and legal certainty for issuers using Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT). The bill will update three of Luxembourg’s financial laws, the Law of 6 April 2013 on dematerialised securitiesTHE Law of 5 April 1993 on the financial sector and the Law of 23 December 1998 establishing a financial sector supervisory commissionThis bill includes the additional option of a supervisory agent role and the inclusion of equity securities in dematerialized form.
DLT and Luxembourg
DLT is increasingly used in the financial and fund management sector in Luxembourg, offering numerous benefits and transforming various aspects of the industry.
Here are some examples:
- Digital Bonds: Luxembourg has seen multiple digital bond issuances via DLT. For example, the European Investment Bank has issued bonds that are registered, transferred and stored via DLT processes. These bonds are governed by Luxembourg law and registered on proprietary DLT platforms.
- Fund Administration: DLT can streamline fund administration processes, offering new opportunities and efficiencies for intermediaries, and can do the following:
- Automate capital calls and distributions using smart contracts,
- Simplify audits and ensure reporting accuracy through transparent and immutable transaction records.
- Warranty Management: Luxembourg-based DLT platforms allow clients to swap ownership of baskets of securities between different collateral pools at precise times.
- Tokenization: DLT is used to tokenize various assets, including real estate and luxury goods, by representing them in a tokenized and fractionalized format on the blockchain. This process can improve the liquidity and accessibility of traditionally illiquid assets.
- Tokenization of investment funds: DLT is being explored for the tokenization of investment funds, which can streamline the supply chain, reduce costs, and enable faster transactions. DLT can automate various elements of the supply chain, reducing the need for reconciliations between entities such as custodians, administrators, and investment managers.
- Issuance, settlement and payment platforms:Market participants are developing trusted networks using DLT technology to serve as a single source of shared truth among participants in financial instrument investment ecosystems.
- Legal framework: Luxembourg has adapted its legal framework to accommodate DLT, recognising the validity and enforceability of DLT-based financial instruments. This includes the following:
- Allow the use of DLT for the issuance of dematerialized securities,
- Recognize DLT for the circulation of securities,
- Enabling financial collateral arrangements on DLT financial instruments.
- Regulatory compliance: DLT can improve transparency in fund share ownership and regulatory compliance, providing fund managers with new opportunities for liquidity management and operational efficiency.
- Financial inclusion: By leveraging DLT, Luxembourg aims to promote greater financial inclusion and participation, potentially creating a more diverse and resilient financial system.
- Governance and ethics:The implementation of DLT can promote higher standards of governance and ethics, contributing to a more sustainable and responsible financial sector.
Luxembourg’s approach to DLT in finance and fund management is characterised by a principle of technology neutrality, recognising that innovative processes and technologies can contribute to improving financial services. This is exemplified by its commitment to creating a compatible legal and regulatory framework.
Short story
Luxembourg has already enacted three major blockchain-related laws, often referred to as Blockchain I, II and III.
Blockchain Law I (2019): This law, passed on March 1, 2019, was one of the first in the EU to recognize blockchain as equivalent to traditional transactions. It allowed the use of DLT for account registration, transfer, and materialization of securities.
Blockchain Law II (2021): Enacted on 22 January 2021, this law strengthened the Luxembourg legal framework on dematerialised securities. It recognised the possibility of using secure electronic registration mechanisms to issue such securities and expanded access for all credit institutions and investment firms.
Blockchain Act III (2023): Also known as Bill 8055, this is the most recent law in the blockchain field and was passed on March 14, 2023. This law has integrated the Luxembourg DLT framework in the following way:
- Update of the Act of 5 August 2005 on provisions relating to financial collateral to enable the use of electronic DLT as collateral on financial instruments registered in securities accounts,
- Implementation of EU Regulation 2022/858 on a pilot scheme for DLT-based market infrastructures (DLT Pilot Regulation),
- Redefining the notion of financial instruments in Law of 5 April 1993 on the financial sector and the Law of 30 May 2018 on financial instruments markets to align with the corresponding European regulations, including MiFID.
The Blockchain III Act strengthened the collateral rules for digital assets and aimed to increase legal certainty by allowing securities accounts on DLT to be pledged, while maintaining the efficient system of the 2005 Act on Financial Collateral Arrangements.
With the Blockchain IV bill, Luxembourg will build on the foundations laid by previous Blockchain laws and aims to consolidate Luxembourg’s position as a leading hub for financial innovation in Europe.
Blockchain Bill IV
The key provisions of the Blockchain IV bill include the following:
- Expanded scope: The bill expands the Luxembourg DLT legal framework to include equity securities in addition to debt securities. This expansion will allow the fund industry and transfer agents to use DLT to manage registers of shares and units, as well as to process fund shares.
- New role of the control agent: The bill introduces the role of a control agent as an alternative to the central account custodian for the issuance of dematerialised securities via DLT. This control agent can be an EU investment firm or a credit institution chosen by the issuer. This new role does not replace the current central account custodian, but, like all other roles, it must be notified to the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF), which is designated as the competent supervisory authority. The notification must be submitted two months after the control agent starts its activities.
- Responsibilities of the control agent: The control agent will manage the securities issuance account, verify the consistency between the securities issued and those registered on the DLT network, and supervise the chain of custody of the securities at the account holder and investor level.
- Simplified payment processesThe bill allows issuers to meet payment obligations under securities (such as interest, dividends or repayments) as soon as they have paid the relevant amounts to the paying agent, settlement agent or central account custodian.
- Simplified issuance and reconciliationThe bill simplifies the process of issuing, holding and reconciling dematerialized securities through DLT, eliminating the need for a central custodian to have a second level of custody and allowing securities to be credited directly to the accounts of investors or their delegates.
- Smart Contract Integration:The new processes can be executed using smart contracts with the assistance of the control agent, potentially increasing efficiency and reducing intermediation.
These changes are expected to bring several benefits to the Luxembourg financial sector, including:
- Fund Operations: Greater efficiency and reduced costs by leveraging DLT for the issuance and transfer of fund shares.
- Financial transactions: Greater transparency and security.
- Transparency of the regulatory environment: Increased attractiveness and competitiveness of the Luxembourg financial centre through greater legal clarity and flexibility for issuers and investors using DLT.
- Smart Contracts: Potential for automation of contractual terms, reduction of intermediaries and improvement of transaction traceability through smart contracts.
Blockchain Bill IV is part of Luxembourg’s ongoing strategy to develop a strong digital ecosystem as part of its economy and maintain its status as a leading hub for financial innovation. Luxembourg is positioning itself at the forefront of Europe’s growing digital financial landscape by constantly updating its regulatory framework.
Local regulations, such as Luxembourg law, complement European regulations by providing a more specific legal framework, adapted to local specificities. These local laws, together with European initiatives, aim to improve both the use and the security of projects involving new technologies. They help establish clear standards and promote consumer trust, while promoting innovation and ensuring better protection against potential risks associated with these emerging technologies. Check out our latest posts on these topics and, for more information on this law, blockchain technology and the tokenization mechanism, do not hesitate to contact us.
We are available to discuss any project related to digital finance, cryptocurrencies and disruptive technologies.
This informational piece, which may be considered advertising under the ethics rules of some jurisdictions, is provided with the understanding that it does not constitute the rendering of legal or other professional advice by Goodwin or its attorneys. Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
-
Regulation7 months ago
Ripple CTO and Cardano founder clash over XRP’s regulatory challenges ⋆ ZyCrypto
-
Regulation5 months ago
Nancy Pelosi Considers Supporting Republican Crypto Bill FIT21 – London Business News
-
Videos6 months ago
Cryptocurrency News: Bitcoin, ETH ETF, AI Crypto Rally, AKT, TON & MORE!!
-
Regulation6 months ago
Bitcoin’s future is ‘bleak’ and ripe for regulation, says lead developer
-
News6 months ago
The trader earned $46 million with PEPE after reaching a new ATH
-
Blockchain6 months ago
Solana ranks the fastest blockchain in the world, surpassing Ethereum, Polygon ⋆ ZyCrypto
-
Blockchain6 months ago
Solana Surpasses Ethereum and Polygon as the Fastest Blockchain ⋆ ZyCrypto
-
Regulation6 months ago
🔒 Crypto needs regulation to thrive: Tyler Cowen
-
Videos6 months ago
Who Really CONTROLS THE MARKETS!! Her plans REVEALED!!
-
Videos7 months ago
Kucoin safe?? Exchange REVIEW and beginner’s guide!!
-
Blockchain6 months ago
“Liquid vesting” is an oxymoronic feature of blockchain that allows early investors to sell without waiting
-
Videos6 months ago
Institutions purchasing MEMECOINS?! Everything you need to know!