Regulation
European stablecoin laws come into force – here are six major concerns related to the MiCA rollout – DL News
MiCA Overview
- Stablecoin laws will go live on European markets on Sunday.
- Exchanges delist stablecoins that are not compliant.
- Experts expect market instability and confusion.
Four years ago, the European Union decided to regulate cryptocurrency markets with a set of digital finance bills.
Now, on Sunday, the stablecoin rules of the Cryptoasset Markets Regulation will come into force.
Even though this first tranche of MiCA rules marks a historic milestone, the crypto industry is concerned about the start of a period of transformation.
Token issuers and crypto platforms will need to adapt to onerous payment licenses, reserve requirements, and the loss of non-compliant tokens.
“These factors could lead to short-term instability and market confusion as the ecosystem adjusts to the new regulatory environment,” said Laura Chaput, head of regulatory compliance at Keyrock, a market maker.
Here’s a practical overview of the status of the MiCA project, as well as how the industry and regulators are addressing six key points:
Tight deadline
The European Banking Authority is responsible for fine-tuning the implementation details of MiCA’s stablecoin rules.
However, the EBA did not publish its final guidance until 13 June.
Join the community to receive our latest stories and updates
The tight timeline is “the biggest pressure point” for the industry, said Jón Egilsson, chairman and co-founder of e-money issuer Monerium. DL News.
An EBA spokesperson said: DL News that the agency finalized and published all technical standards for which it was responsible by the June 30 deadline.
She also continues to prepare for her upcoming supervisory duties, the spokesperson said.
Radiations
Stablecoins that do not comply with MiCA rules will be gradually removed from the EU.
Delistings risk causing market disruption, reduced options and liquidity issues, Chaput said.
Bitstamp will delist Tether’s euro stablecoin, the exchange announced on Wednesday. OKX delisted Tether for EU users in March.
Binance said it would restrict unauthorized stablecoins for EU users on some of its services, and Kraken said it was reviewing possible delistings.
Electronic money license
MiCA defines e-money tokens as electronic money. This definition involves another European regulation, known as the Payment Services Directive.
The second iteration of this law — hence the nickname PSD2 — has been in effect since 2016 and requires platforms that manage electronic money to comply with onerous requirements — more so than crypto-asset platforms.
Getting a permit can take years.
“We don’t know for sure whether stablecoins are electronic money,” said Victor Charpiat, an attorney at Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP. “This has a major impact on their tax and accounting treatment. »
Charpiat expressed concern that the provision has not been formally clarified by regulators and that, with few crypto companies holding a license under PSD2, companies will lose customers.
“Many digital asset service providers are at risk of violating the law starting next Monday, and there is no way to be sure because there is no clarification,” he said. declared.
EBA regulators said they had called on the industry to prepare “in a timely manner” for MiCA once it became law a year ago, and provided tools for asking questions.
Whether a platform needs a payment service license for e-money token transactions depends on its activities, the EBA spokesperson said. “They would be allowed on a case-by-case basis.”
Permissionless networks
Some crypto asset service providers operating and interacting with permissionless networks will not be able to comply with PSD2 requirements, said Tommaso Astazi, head of regulatory affairs at trade association Blockchain For Europe.
For example, the law requires payment platforms to protect funds received for the execution of payment transactions.
When users use self-hosted wallets or make transfers across DeFi platforms on different blockchains, companies might not be able to hold assets as PSD2 says, Astazi said.
Caps for non-euro stablecoins
Issuers of non-euro-denominated stablecoins or multi-asset-backed stablecoins are capped.
These issuers must stick to a volume of 200 million euros per day or one million transactions when the token is used as a “medium of exchange,” according to MiCA.
“Imposing volume limitations on US dollar-backed stablecoins could lead to a shift towards euro-backed alternatives, impacting stablecoin market dynamics,” Chaput said.
There are significant exceptions to the thresholds, the EBA clarified in its implementation reports, allaying some of the industry’s concerns.
They do not count when the stablecoin is used for trading purposes, as collateral for transactions with financial instruments or used to settle a derivative product.
Issuers can also ignore the thresholds if they have “reasonable grounds” to assume that the transaction is not intended to pay for goods or services, according to the EBA. report.
Local reserves
MiCA requires stablecoin issuers to hold 30% of cash reserves in EU bank accounts, or 60% for large e-money tokens.
These reserves must be spread across several local banks to mitigate concentration risk.
“This will deal a more immediate blow than the strict limits placed on the use of dollar-denominated stablecoins in the EU,” Hugo Coelho, head of digital asset regulation at the Cambridge Center for Alternative Finance, recently said. Mike Ringer, partner at law firm CMS. wrote.
This is a challenge because few banks accept issuers of banking cryptocurrencies. And because it is expensive since it means that the funds cannot be used to invest in safe assets.
For Egilsson, this provision removes cryptography’s initial promise of operating independently of the banking system.
Crypto opportunity does not depend on bank solvency, he said DL News in March.
“We can work with that. It’s not an obstacle,” he said. “But going forward, this is a problem that will need to be resolved.” »
Inbar Preiss is a legal correspondent at DL News. Got a tip? Send her an email at inbar@dlnews.com.
Regulation
Crypto community gets involved in anti-government protests in Nigeria
Amid the #EndBadGovernanceInNigeria protests in Nigeria, a notable shift is occurring within the country’s cryptocurrency sector. As the general public demands sweeping governance reforms, crypto community leaders are seizing the opportunity to advocate for specific regulatory changes.
Rume Ophi, former secretary of the Blockchain Stakeholders Association of Nigeria (SiBAN), stressed the critical need to integrate crypto-focused demands into the broader agenda of the protests.
Ophi explained the dual benefit of such requirements, noting that proper regulation can spur substantial economic growth by attracting investors and creating job opportunities. Ophi noted, “Including calls for favorable crypto regulations is not just about the crypto community; it’s about leveraging these technologies to foster broader economic prosperity.”
Existing government efforts
In opposition to Ophi’s call for action, Chimezie Chuta, chair of the National Blockchain Policy Steering Committee, presents a different view. He pointed out The Nigerian government continued efforts to nurture the blockchain and cryptocurrency industries.
According to Chuta, the creation of a steering committee was essential to effectively address the needs of the crypto community.
Chuta also highlighted the creation of a subcommittee to harmonize regulations for virtual asset service providers (VASPs). With the aim of streamlining operations and providing clear regulatory direction, the initiative involves cooperation with major organizations including the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN). “Our efforts should mitigate the need for protest as substantial progress is being made to address the needs of the crypto industry,” Chuta said.
A united call for support
The ongoing dialogue between the crypto community and government agencies reflects a complex landscape of negotiations and demands for progress.
While actors like Ophi are calling for more direct action and the inclusion of crypto demands in protest agendas, government figures like Chuta are advocating for recognition of the steps already taken.
As protests continue, the crypto community’s push for regulatory reform highlights a crucial aspect of Nigeria’s broader fight to improve governance and economic policies. Both sides agree that favorable regulations are critical to the successful adoption and implementation of blockchain technologies, signaling a potentially transformative era for Nigeria’s economic framework.
Read also : OKX Exchange Exits Nigerian Market Amid Regulatory Crackdown
Regulation
Cryptocurrency Regulations in Slovenia 2024
Slovenia, a small but highly developed European country with a population of 2.1 million, boasts a rich industrial history that has contributed greatly to its strong economy. As the most economically developed Slavic nation, Slovenia has grown steadily since adopting the euro in 2007. Its openness to innovation has been a key factor in its success in the industrial sector, making it a prime destination for cryptocurrency enthusiasts. Many believe that Slovenia is poised to become a powerful fintech hub in Europe. But does its current regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies support such aspirations?
Let’s explore Slovenia’s cryptocurrency regulations and see if they can propel the country to the forefront of the cryptocurrency landscape. My expectations are positive. What are yours? Before we answer, let’s dig a little deeper.
1. Cryptocurrency regulation in Slovenia: an overview
Slovenia is renowned for its innovation-friendly stance, providing a supportive environment for emerging technologies such as blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Under the Payment Services and Systems Act, cryptocurrencies are classified as virtual assets rather than financial or monetary instruments.
The regulation of the cryptocurrency sector in Slovenia is decentralized. Different authorities manage different aspects of the ecosystem. For example, the Bank of Slovenia and the Securities Market Agency oversee cryptocurrency transactions to ensure compliance with financial laws, including anti-money laundering (AML) and terrorist financing regulations. The Slovenian Act on the Prevention of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing (ZPPDFT-2) incorporates the EU’s 5th Anti-Money Laundering Directive (5MLD) and aligns with the latest FATF recommendations. All virtual currency service providers must register with the Office of the Republic of Slovenia.
2. Cryptocurrency regulation in Slovenia: what’s new?
Several notable developments have taken place this year in the cryptocurrency sector in Slovenia:
July 25, 2024:Slovenia has issued a €30 million on-chain digital sovereign bond, the first of its kind in the EU, with a yield of 3.65%, maturing on 25 November 2024.
May 14, 2024:NiceHash has announced the first Slovenian Bitcoin-focused conference, NiceHashX, scheduled for November 8-9 in Maribor.
3. Explanation of the tax framework for cryptocurrencies in Slovenia
The Slovenian cryptocurrency tax framework provides clear guidelines for individuals and businesses. According to the Slovenian Financial Administration, the tax treatment depends on the status of the trader and the nature of the transaction.
- People:Income earned from cryptocurrencies through employment or ongoing business activities is subject to personal income tax. However, capital gains from transactions or market fluctuations are exempt from tax.
- Companies:Capital gains from cryptocurrency-related activities are subject to a 19% corporate tax. Value-added tax (VAT) generally applies at a rate of 22%, although cryptocurrency transactions that are considered as means of payment are exempt from VAT. Companies are not allowed to limit payment methods to cryptocurrencies alone. Tokens issued during ICOs must follow standard accounting rules and corporate tax law.
4. Cryptocurrency Mining in Slovenia: What You Need to Know
Cryptocurrency mining is not restricted in Slovenia, but income from mining is considered business income and is therefore taxable. This includes rewards from validating transactions and any additional income from mining operations. Both individuals and legal entities must comply with Slovenian tax regulations.
5. Timeline of the development of cryptocurrency regulation in Slovenia
Here is a timeline highlighting the evolution of cryptocurrency regulations in Slovenia:
- 2013:The Slovenian Financial Administration has issued guidelines stating that income from cryptocurrency transactions should be taxed.
- 2017:The Slovenian Financial Administration has provided more detailed guidelines on cryptocurrency taxation, depending on factors such as the status of the trader and the type of transaction.
- 2023:The EU adopted the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) Regulation, establishing a uniform regulatory framework for crypto-assets, their issuers and service providers across the EU.
Endnote
Slovenia’s approach to the cryptocurrency sector is commendable, reflecting its optimistic view of the future of cryptocurrencies. The country’s balanced regulatory framework supports cryptocurrency innovation while protecting users’ rights and preventing illegal activities. Recent developments demonstrate Slovenia’s commitment to continually improving its regulatory environment. Slovenia’s cryptocurrency regulatory framework sets a positive example for other nations navigating the evolving cryptocurrency landscape.
Read also : Hong Kong Cryptocurrency Regulations 2024
Regulation
A Blank Sheet for Cryptocurrencies: Kamala Harris’ Regulatory Opportunity
photo by Shubham Dhage on Unsplash
As the cryptocurrency landscape continues to evolve, the need for clear regulation has never been more pressing.
With Vice President Kamala Harris now leading the charge on digital asset regulation in the United States, this represents a unique opportunity to start fresh. This fresh start can foster innovation and protect consumers. It can also pave the way for widespread adoption across industries, including real estate agencies, healthcare providers, and online gaming platforms like these. online casinos ukAccording to experts at SafestCasinoSites, these platforms come with benefits such as bonus offers, a wide selection of games, and various payment methods. Ultimately, all this increase in adoption could propel the cryptocurrency market forward.
With this in mind, let’s look at the current state of cryptocurrency regulation in the United States, a complex and confusing landscape. Multiple agencies, including the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), have overlapping jurisdictions, creating a fragmented regulatory environment. This lack of clarity has stifled innovation as companies are reluctant to invest in the United States, fearing regulatory repercussions. A coherent and clear regulatory framework is urgently needed to realize the full potential of cryptocurrencies in the United States.
While the US struggles to find its footing, other countries, such as Singapore and the UK, are actively looking into the cryptocurrency sector by adopting clear and supportive regulatory frameworks. This has led to a brain drain, with companies choosing to locate in more conducive environments.
Vice President Kamala Harris has a unique opportunity to change that narrative and start over. Regulation of cryptocurrencies. By taking a comprehensive and inclusive approach, it can help create a framework that balances consumer protection with innovation and growth. The time has come for clear and effective regulation of cryptocurrencies in the United States.
Effective regulation of digital assets is essential to foster a safe and innovative environment. The key principles guiding this regulation are clarity, innovation, global cooperation, consumer protection, and flexibility. Clear definitions and guidelines eliminate ambiguity while encouraging experimentation and development to ensure progress. Collaboration with international partners establishes consistent standards, preventing regulatory arbitrage. Strong safeguards protect consumers from fraud and market abuse, and adaptability allows for evolution in response to emerging trends and technologies, striking a balance between innovation and protection.
The benefits of effective cryptocurrency regulation are multiple and far-reaching. By establishing clear guidelines, governments can attract investors and mainstream users, driving growth and adoption. This can, in turn, position countries like the United States as global leaders in fintech and innovation. Strong safeguards will also increase consumer confidence in digital assets and related products, increasing economic activity.
A thriving crypto industry can contribute significantly to GDP and job creation, which has a positive impact on the overall economy. Furthermore, effective regulation has paved the way for the growth of many businesses such as tech startups, online casinos, and pharmaceutical companies, demonstrating that clear guidelines can open up new opportunities without stifling innovation. This is a great example of how regulation can allay fears of regressive policies, even if Kamala Harris does not repeal the current progressive approach. By adopting effective regulation, governments can create fertile ground for the crypto industry to thrive, thereby promoting progress and prosperity.
Regulation
South Korea Imposes New ‘Monitoring’ Fees on Cryptocurrency Exchanges
Big news! The latest regulatory changes in South Korea are expected to impact major cryptocurrency exchanges like Upbit and Bithumb. Under the updated regulations, these platforms will now have to pay monitoring fees, which could cause problems for some exchanges.
Overview of new fees
In the latest move to regulate cryptocurrencies, the Financial Services Commission announced on July 1 the revised “Enforcement Order of the Act on the Establishment of the Financial Services Commission, etc.” update “Regulations on the collection of contributions from financial institutions, etc.” According to local legislation newsThe regulations require virtual asset operators to pay supervisory fees for inspections conducted by the Financial Supervisory Service starting next year. The total fees for the four major exchanges are estimated at around 300 million won, or about $220,000.
Apportionment of costs
Upbit, which holds a dominant market share, is expected to bear more than 90% of the total fee, or about 272 million won ($199,592) based on its operating revenue. Bithumb will pay about 21.14 million won ($155,157), while Coinone and GOPAX will contribute about 6.03 million won ($4,422) and 830,000 won ($608), respectively. Korbit is excluded from this fee due to its lower operating revenue.
Impact on the industry
The supervision fee will function similarly to a quasi-tax for financial institutions subject to inspections by the Financial Supervisory Service. The new law requires any company with a turnover of 3 billion won or more to pay the fee.
In the past, fees for electronic financial companies and P2P investment firms were phased in over three years. However, the taxation of virtual asset operators has been accelerated, reflecting the rapid growth of the cryptocurrency market and increasing regulatory scrutiny.
Industry reactions
The rapid introduction of the fee was unexpected by some industry players, who had expected a delay. Financial Supervisory Service officials justified the decision by citing the creation of the body concerned and the costs already incurred.
While larger exchanges like Upbit and Bithumb can afford the cost, smaller exchanges like Coinone and GOPAX, which are currently operating at a loss, could face an additional financial burden. This is part of a broader trend of declining trading volumes for South Korean exchanges, which have seen a 30% drop since the new law went into effect.
-
Regulation7 months ago
Ripple CTO and Cardano founder clash over XRP’s regulatory challenges ⋆ ZyCrypto
-
Regulation5 months ago
Nancy Pelosi Considers Supporting Republican Crypto Bill FIT21 – London Business News
-
Videos6 months ago
Cryptocurrency News: Bitcoin, ETH ETF, AI Crypto Rally, AKT, TON & MORE!!
-
Regulation6 months ago
Bitcoin’s future is ‘bleak’ and ripe for regulation, says lead developer
-
News6 months ago
The trader earned $46 million with PEPE after reaching a new ATH
-
Blockchain6 months ago
Solana ranks the fastest blockchain in the world, surpassing Ethereum, Polygon ⋆ ZyCrypto
-
Blockchain6 months ago
Solana Surpasses Ethereum and Polygon as the Fastest Blockchain ⋆ ZyCrypto
-
Regulation6 months ago
🔒 Crypto needs regulation to thrive: Tyler Cowen
-
Videos6 months ago
Who Really CONTROLS THE MARKETS!! Her plans REVEALED!!
-
Videos7 months ago
Kucoin safe?? Exchange REVIEW and beginner’s guide!!
-
Blockchain6 months ago
“Liquid vesting” is an oxymoronic feature of blockchain that allows early investors to sell without waiting
-
Videos6 months ago
Institutions purchasing MEMECOINS?! Everything you need to know!