Regulation
Our approach to regulating cryptocurrencies needs clarity
In March this year, Sam Bankman-Fried, founder of the now-defunct crypto exchange FTX, was sentenced to 25 years in prison for fraud and conspiracy. In an email interview with ABC News a few weeks later, he wrote: “That’s the main thing I think about every day.” »
In March this year, Sam Bankman-Fried, founder of the now-defunct crypto exchange FTX, was sentenced to 25 years in prison for fraud and conspiracy. In an email interview with ABC News a few weeks later, he wrote: “That’s the main thing I think about every day.” »
That’s certainly what many others think too. Prosecutors say conservative estimates of losses from this fraud are $8 billion for FTX customers, $1.7 billion for FTX investors and $1.3 billion for lenders. from Alameda. Once the richest and most influential man in the crypto industry, Fried or “SBF” was the creator of the successful crypto trading exchange FTX and trading company Alameda Research. His crypto empire collapsed in November 2022, following multiple acts of financial fraud and deception, all led by him.
Hi! You are reading a premium article! Subscribe now to continue reading.
Already registered? To log in
Premium benefits
-
35+ bonus articles every day
-
Specially curated Newsletters every day
-
Access to 15+ Print edition articles every day
-
Webinar reserved for subscribers by specialized journalists
-
E Paper, Archives, select Articles from the Wall Street Journal and The Economist
-
Access to offers reserved for subscribers: Infographics I Podcasts
Unlock 35+ well-researched
premium articles every day
Access to global information with
More than 100 exclusive articles from
international publications
Get free access to
3+ Investment Based Apps
TRENDLYNE Get 1 Month GuruQ Plan at Rs 1
FINOLOGY Free subscription to finology for 1 month.
SMALLCASE 20% off all small suitcases
5+ subscriber-only newsletters
specially organized by experts
Free access to electronic paper and
WhatsApp updates
That’s certainly what many others think too. Prosecutors say conservative estimates of losses from this fraud are $8 billion for FTX customers, $1.7 billion for FTX investors and $1.3 billion for lenders. from Alameda. Once the richest and most influential man in the crypto industry, Fried or “SBF” was the creator of the successful crypto trading exchange FTX and trading firm Alameda Research. His crypto empire collapsed in November 2022, following multiple acts of financial fraud and deception, all led by him.
The collapse of FTX marked a hellish period for cryptocurrencies which reached their lowest level in several years. After peaking at $3 trillion in November 2021, the FTX debacle saw the value of the overall crypto market plummet to its lowest level in two years at $796 billion. It also triggered a much-needed regulatory crackdown.
Here in India, the relationship between regulation and crypto has remained sooty at best. The three main protagonists in the history of cryptocurrencies – the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) and the government – have at different times had diametrically opposed views on cryptocurrencies. Of the three, it is clearly the central bank that has always been the most vehement in its criticism and distrust of the crypto ecosystem.
However, it is the government which seems to have got itself into difficulty, as well as its political action. A bill on cryptocurrencies has been in preparation since 2021, but has still not seen the light of day. What happened in its place in 2022 was a fiscal blow. Cryptocurrency trading in India attracts a 1% tax withheld at source (TDS) as well as a 30% capital gains tax, with no provision for crypto loss compensation.
The government classified crypto assets as “virtual digital assets,” while refusing to answer the controversial question of whether they were legal or not. “Whether it’s legitimate or illegitimate is another question. But I will tax [crypto gains] because it is a sovereign right to tax,” said Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on this subject.
For an industry that has often resembled the dotcom bubble in its narrative, regulation in India has consistently shied away from addressing the who, what and how of crypto. Crypto proponents swear it’s the answer to financial democratization and crypto skeptics say it’s just fraud written with a “c.”
When I started gathering numbers on cryptocurrency trading in 2021, data from research firm Crebaco showed that around 15 million Indians had invested in cryptocurrencies through Indian exchanges. New registrations led to a nearly 150% monthly increase in trading volumes.
The government and policymakers were visibly nervous. Crypto was popular with the younger generation and there were a series of incidents visible across India involving kidnapping, extortion, money laundering and drug deals where crypto coins were the weapon or the ransom currency of choice.
So even though a clear policy eluded crypto, two decisions were made. The first was a heavy tax, perhaps intended to dampen commercial enthusiasm; the second was a notification issued in March 2023 that brought cryptocurrencies and other digital assets under Indian anti-money laundering law. The PMLA’s intention here was to combat money laundering by essentially placing the onus of transparency and controls on Indian cryptocurrency exchange platforms.
However, things did not go as planned. By the end of 2023, a report by think tank Esya Center reveals that around 3-5 million Indian users have shifted to offshore platforms, resulting in transaction volume worth 3.8 billion dollars outside national stock exchanges. This is a loss of users and taxes. Clearly, neither the 30% tax nor the inclusion of PMLA has been a deterrent for those trading cryptocurrencies; only a nuisance. A problem that connections to private networks helped to circumvent.
Even though the Ministry of Information Technology has blocked access to foreign platforms like Binance, Kucoin, and Bitfinex, India-based crypto platforms and entrepreneurs have quietly moved their operations to places like Dubai, likely because neither Indian politics nor the stress of remaining based in India no longer seemed appealing. .
As the Indian crypto industry continues to play a guessing game over regulation, what is clear is that our lack of policy clarity has never helped. The United States has learned the hard way that it needs to do more than just fight a flood of crypto-related litigation. The UK, EU, Singapore, Japan and Australia have made progress in establishing compelling regulatory frameworks for digital assets.
For India, the first step will be to identify who is in charge. Should it be Sebi, which has jurisdiction over other financial markets? Should it be the RBI, which is our banking regulator and monetary authority? Or should it be another, hybrid body with financial and digital oversight? However, the biggest regulatory question isn’t who. That is why.
Catch all Economic news, Market News, latest news Events and Latest news Updates on Live Mint. Download the Mint News app to get daily market updates.
Regulation
Crypto community gets involved in anti-government protests in Nigeria
Amid the #EndBadGovernanceInNigeria protests in Nigeria, a notable shift is occurring within the country’s cryptocurrency sector. As the general public demands sweeping governance reforms, crypto community leaders are seizing the opportunity to advocate for specific regulatory changes.
Rume Ophi, former secretary of the Blockchain Stakeholders Association of Nigeria (SiBAN), stressed the critical need to integrate crypto-focused demands into the broader agenda of the protests.
Ophi explained the dual benefit of such requirements, noting that proper regulation can spur substantial economic growth by attracting investors and creating job opportunities. Ophi noted, “Including calls for favorable crypto regulations is not just about the crypto community; it’s about leveraging these technologies to foster broader economic prosperity.”
Existing government efforts
In opposition to Ophi’s call for action, Chimezie Chuta, chair of the National Blockchain Policy Steering Committee, presents a different view. He pointed out The Nigerian government continued efforts to nurture the blockchain and cryptocurrency industries.
According to Chuta, the creation of a steering committee was essential to effectively address the needs of the crypto community.
Chuta also highlighted the creation of a subcommittee to harmonize regulations for virtual asset service providers (VASPs). With the aim of streamlining operations and providing clear regulatory direction, the initiative involves cooperation with major organizations including the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN). “Our efforts should mitigate the need for protest as substantial progress is being made to address the needs of the crypto industry,” Chuta said.
A united call for support
The ongoing dialogue between the crypto community and government agencies reflects a complex landscape of negotiations and demands for progress.
While actors like Ophi are calling for more direct action and the inclusion of crypto demands in protest agendas, government figures like Chuta are advocating for recognition of the steps already taken.
As protests continue, the crypto community’s push for regulatory reform highlights a crucial aspect of Nigeria’s broader fight to improve governance and economic policies. Both sides agree that favorable regulations are critical to the successful adoption and implementation of blockchain technologies, signaling a potentially transformative era for Nigeria’s economic framework.
Read also : OKX Exchange Exits Nigerian Market Amid Regulatory Crackdown
Regulation
Cryptocurrency Regulations in Slovenia 2024
Slovenia, a small but highly developed European country with a population of 2.1 million, boasts a rich industrial history that has contributed greatly to its strong economy. As the most economically developed Slavic nation, Slovenia has grown steadily since adopting the euro in 2007. Its openness to innovation has been a key factor in its success in the industrial sector, making it a prime destination for cryptocurrency enthusiasts. Many believe that Slovenia is poised to become a powerful fintech hub in Europe. But does its current regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies support such aspirations?
Let’s explore Slovenia’s cryptocurrency regulations and see if they can propel the country to the forefront of the cryptocurrency landscape. My expectations are positive. What are yours? Before we answer, let’s dig a little deeper.
1. Cryptocurrency regulation in Slovenia: an overview
Slovenia is renowned for its innovation-friendly stance, providing a supportive environment for emerging technologies such as blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Under the Payment Services and Systems Act, cryptocurrencies are classified as virtual assets rather than financial or monetary instruments.
The regulation of the cryptocurrency sector in Slovenia is decentralized. Different authorities manage different aspects of the ecosystem. For example, the Bank of Slovenia and the Securities Market Agency oversee cryptocurrency transactions to ensure compliance with financial laws, including anti-money laundering (AML) and terrorist financing regulations. The Slovenian Act on the Prevention of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing (ZPPDFT-2) incorporates the EU’s 5th Anti-Money Laundering Directive (5MLD) and aligns with the latest FATF recommendations. All virtual currency service providers must register with the Office of the Republic of Slovenia.
2. Cryptocurrency regulation in Slovenia: what’s new?
Several notable developments have taken place this year in the cryptocurrency sector in Slovenia:
July 25, 2024:Slovenia has issued a €30 million on-chain digital sovereign bond, the first of its kind in the EU, with a yield of 3.65%, maturing on 25 November 2024.
May 14, 2024:NiceHash has announced the first Slovenian Bitcoin-focused conference, NiceHashX, scheduled for November 8-9 in Maribor.
3. Explanation of the tax framework for cryptocurrencies in Slovenia
The Slovenian cryptocurrency tax framework provides clear guidelines for individuals and businesses. According to the Slovenian Financial Administration, the tax treatment depends on the status of the trader and the nature of the transaction.
- People:Income earned from cryptocurrencies through employment or ongoing business activities is subject to personal income tax. However, capital gains from transactions or market fluctuations are exempt from tax.
- Companies:Capital gains from cryptocurrency-related activities are subject to a 19% corporate tax. Value-added tax (VAT) generally applies at a rate of 22%, although cryptocurrency transactions that are considered as means of payment are exempt from VAT. Companies are not allowed to limit payment methods to cryptocurrencies alone. Tokens issued during ICOs must follow standard accounting rules and corporate tax law.
4. Cryptocurrency Mining in Slovenia: What You Need to Know
Cryptocurrency mining is not restricted in Slovenia, but income from mining is considered business income and is therefore taxable. This includes rewards from validating transactions and any additional income from mining operations. Both individuals and legal entities must comply with Slovenian tax regulations.
5. Timeline of the development of cryptocurrency regulation in Slovenia
Here is a timeline highlighting the evolution of cryptocurrency regulations in Slovenia:
- 2013:The Slovenian Financial Administration has issued guidelines stating that income from cryptocurrency transactions should be taxed.
- 2017:The Slovenian Financial Administration has provided more detailed guidelines on cryptocurrency taxation, depending on factors such as the status of the trader and the type of transaction.
- 2023:The EU adopted the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) Regulation, establishing a uniform regulatory framework for crypto-assets, their issuers and service providers across the EU.
Endnote
Slovenia’s approach to the cryptocurrency sector is commendable, reflecting its optimistic view of the future of cryptocurrencies. The country’s balanced regulatory framework supports cryptocurrency innovation while protecting users’ rights and preventing illegal activities. Recent developments demonstrate Slovenia’s commitment to continually improving its regulatory environment. Slovenia’s cryptocurrency regulatory framework sets a positive example for other nations navigating the evolving cryptocurrency landscape.
Read also : Hong Kong Cryptocurrency Regulations 2024
Regulation
A Blank Sheet for Cryptocurrencies: Kamala Harris’ Regulatory Opportunity
photo by Shubham Dhage on Unsplash
As the cryptocurrency landscape continues to evolve, the need for clear regulation has never been more pressing.
With Vice President Kamala Harris now leading the charge on digital asset regulation in the United States, this represents a unique opportunity to start fresh. This fresh start can foster innovation and protect consumers. It can also pave the way for widespread adoption across industries, including real estate agencies, healthcare providers, and online gaming platforms like these. online casinos ukAccording to experts at SafestCasinoSites, these platforms come with benefits such as bonus offers, a wide selection of games, and various payment methods. Ultimately, all this increase in adoption could propel the cryptocurrency market forward.
With this in mind, let’s look at the current state of cryptocurrency regulation in the United States, a complex and confusing landscape. Multiple agencies, including the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), have overlapping jurisdictions, creating a fragmented regulatory environment. This lack of clarity has stifled innovation as companies are reluctant to invest in the United States, fearing regulatory repercussions. A coherent and clear regulatory framework is urgently needed to realize the full potential of cryptocurrencies in the United States.
While the US struggles to find its footing, other countries, such as Singapore and the UK, are actively looking into the cryptocurrency sector by adopting clear and supportive regulatory frameworks. This has led to a brain drain, with companies choosing to locate in more conducive environments.
Vice President Kamala Harris has a unique opportunity to change that narrative and start over. Regulation of cryptocurrencies. By taking a comprehensive and inclusive approach, it can help create a framework that balances consumer protection with innovation and growth. The time has come for clear and effective regulation of cryptocurrencies in the United States.
Effective regulation of digital assets is essential to foster a safe and innovative environment. The key principles guiding this regulation are clarity, innovation, global cooperation, consumer protection, and flexibility. Clear definitions and guidelines eliminate ambiguity while encouraging experimentation and development to ensure progress. Collaboration with international partners establishes consistent standards, preventing regulatory arbitrage. Strong safeguards protect consumers from fraud and market abuse, and adaptability allows for evolution in response to emerging trends and technologies, striking a balance between innovation and protection.
The benefits of effective cryptocurrency regulation are multiple and far-reaching. By establishing clear guidelines, governments can attract investors and mainstream users, driving growth and adoption. This can, in turn, position countries like the United States as global leaders in fintech and innovation. Strong safeguards will also increase consumer confidence in digital assets and related products, increasing economic activity.
A thriving crypto industry can contribute significantly to GDP and job creation, which has a positive impact on the overall economy. Furthermore, effective regulation has paved the way for the growth of many businesses such as tech startups, online casinos, and pharmaceutical companies, demonstrating that clear guidelines can open up new opportunities without stifling innovation. This is a great example of how regulation can allay fears of regressive policies, even if Kamala Harris does not repeal the current progressive approach. By adopting effective regulation, governments can create fertile ground for the crypto industry to thrive, thereby promoting progress and prosperity.
Regulation
South Korea Imposes New ‘Monitoring’ Fees on Cryptocurrency Exchanges
Big news! The latest regulatory changes in South Korea are expected to impact major cryptocurrency exchanges like Upbit and Bithumb. Under the updated regulations, these platforms will now have to pay monitoring fees, which could cause problems for some exchanges.
Overview of new fees
In the latest move to regulate cryptocurrencies, the Financial Services Commission announced on July 1 the revised “Enforcement Order of the Act on the Establishment of the Financial Services Commission, etc.” update “Regulations on the collection of contributions from financial institutions, etc.” According to local legislation newsThe regulations require virtual asset operators to pay supervisory fees for inspections conducted by the Financial Supervisory Service starting next year. The total fees for the four major exchanges are estimated at around 300 million won, or about $220,000.
Apportionment of costs
Upbit, which holds a dominant market share, is expected to bear more than 90% of the total fee, or about 272 million won ($199,592) based on its operating revenue. Bithumb will pay about 21.14 million won ($155,157), while Coinone and GOPAX will contribute about 6.03 million won ($4,422) and 830,000 won ($608), respectively. Korbit is excluded from this fee due to its lower operating revenue.
Impact on the industry
The supervision fee will function similarly to a quasi-tax for financial institutions subject to inspections by the Financial Supervisory Service. The new law requires any company with a turnover of 3 billion won or more to pay the fee.
In the past, fees for electronic financial companies and P2P investment firms were phased in over three years. However, the taxation of virtual asset operators has been accelerated, reflecting the rapid growth of the cryptocurrency market and increasing regulatory scrutiny.
Industry reactions
The rapid introduction of the fee was unexpected by some industry players, who had expected a delay. Financial Supervisory Service officials justified the decision by citing the creation of the body concerned and the costs already incurred.
While larger exchanges like Upbit and Bithumb can afford the cost, smaller exchanges like Coinone and GOPAX, which are currently operating at a loss, could face an additional financial burden. This is part of a broader trend of declining trading volumes for South Korean exchanges, which have seen a 30% drop since the new law went into effect.
-
Regulation7 months ago
Ripple CTO and Cardano founder clash over XRP’s regulatory challenges ⋆ ZyCrypto
-
Regulation5 months ago
Nancy Pelosi Considers Supporting Republican Crypto Bill FIT21 – London Business News
-
Videos6 months ago
Cryptocurrency News: Bitcoin, ETH ETF, AI Crypto Rally, AKT, TON & MORE!!
-
Regulation6 months ago
Bitcoin’s future is ‘bleak’ and ripe for regulation, says lead developer
-
News6 months ago
The trader earned $46 million with PEPE after reaching a new ATH
-
Blockchain6 months ago
Solana ranks the fastest blockchain in the world, surpassing Ethereum, Polygon ⋆ ZyCrypto
-
Blockchain6 months ago
Solana Surpasses Ethereum and Polygon as the Fastest Blockchain ⋆ ZyCrypto
-
Regulation6 months ago
🔒 Crypto needs regulation to thrive: Tyler Cowen
-
Videos6 months ago
Who Really CONTROLS THE MARKETS!! Her plans REVEALED!!
-
Videos7 months ago
Kucoin safe?? Exchange REVIEW and beginner’s guide!!
-
Blockchain6 months ago
“Liquid vesting” is an oxymoronic feature of blockchain that allows early investors to sell without waiting
-
Videos6 months ago
Institutions purchasing MEMECOINS?! Everything you need to know!