Connect with us

Regulation

“Right to Mine” Crypto Laws Making Way in the US

BlockChainBulletin Staff

Published

on

“Right to Mine” Crypto Laws Making Way in the US

If you drive 45 miles north of Little Rock, Arkansas, you’ll encounter a facility filled with thousands of computers trying to “mine” the next bitcoin.

The value of the popular cryptocurrency recently surpassed $60,000 per bitcoin. Mining these bitcoins is a lucrative operation, and several cryptocurrency mining companies have moved to the state since the law was passed. Arkansas Data Center Law last year, also known as the “right to exploit” bill. Similar bills granting protections to crypto mining operations from local regulations have appeared in a few states.

But it turns out that residents don’t particularly like many of these operations. And Arkansas recently changed course and gave municipalities back the ability to regulate crypto miners.

Marketplace’s Lily Jamali recently spoke with Gabriel Dance, deputy investigative editor at The New York Times, on the crypto mining situation in Arkansas. He explained what the most important complaints have been since the arrival of these mining operations.

The following is an edited transcript of their conversation

Gabriel Dance: The biggest concern I heard in Arkansas in particular – and I’ve also visited mines in Texas and North Dakota – was noise. It’s probably hard to understand how loud these mines are, but in general, they basically ship crates full of thousands of computers, and each of those computers has a fan. And the fans are spinning, and thousands of these fans working together can create a very loud noise similar to an airplane in slow motion. So this is the main concern for many Arkansas residents. I mean, they live in primarily rural communities, and they intentionally moved to these communities for peace and to get away from busy cities. So the arrival of these mines and the destruction of the atmosphere is incredibly disruptive, not only to the people who live there, but also to the wildlife. And things like hunters are also very concerned about this. But there are also concerns about rising energy prices, excessive water consumption to cool machines and, of course, the associated pollution. Another thing that worries them is who exactly owns all of these mines, because they appear to be connected to a network of shell companies, some of which have ties to the Chinese government.

Lily Jamali: I found this very interesting and actually very new in your reporting. I hadn’t seen this in many cases, it appears that it is Chinese nationals who own and operate these facilities.

Dance: Yes, and it’s not just in Arkansas, but certainly in Arkansas, there is this network of shell companies that I described, one of which has direct ties to the Chinese government. And then several of the people involved in this mine seem to have positions in several other mines. But it’s not just a problem in Arkansas, it’s linked to a larger influx of Chinese holdings across the United States, some of which have attracted national security scrutiny. For example, an active mine in Wyoming is just less than a mile from an Air Force base that controls nuclear-armed intercontinental ballistic missiles. Microsoft, the technology company that operates a nearby data center, sent a report to the US government warning that it could be used for intelligence gathering operations. Other Chinese-owned Bitcoin mines are located directly next to large substations which, if taken offline, could wreak havoc on the areas where they are located.

Jamali: Electrical substations.

Dance: Yes yes. In total, we identified Chinese-owned or operated Bitcoin mines in at least a dozen states.

Jamali: I want to sort of look at the forces behind this legislation that we’re seeing in Arkansas and elsewhere. You write that the Satoshi Action Fund helped draft these laws. Can you explain what the Satoshi Action Fund is and who is behind it?

Dance: Of course, the Satoshi Action Fund is a non-profit advocacy group that primarily advocates for Bitcoin mining. The company is based in Mississippi, and its co-founder actually worked in the Trump administration, rolling back Obama-era climate policies. It was actually founded five years ago as the Energy 45 Fund. And its founder, Mandy Gunasekara, had spent the previous two years at the Environmental Protection Agency, where she played a key role in the decision to withdraw the United States from the Paris climate agreement and helped repeal the Clean Power Plan.

Jamali: And she worked with former EPA Director Scott Pruitt, who listeners may remember from that era of the Trump administration.

Dance: That’s right. In fact, she credited Scott Pruitt with introducing her to bitcoin and bitcoin mining.

Jamali: Oh wow.

Dance: Yeah, that was an interesting thing she said in a podcast that Mr. Pruitt had originally suggested that they even go into business together selling electricity to Bitcoin miners.

Jamali: I had no idea. Well, we contacted the Satoshi Action Fund for this segment and did not receive a response. Let me ask you this, Gabriel, how is this law in Arkansas part of a larger trend? Where else have these laws to deregulate the crypto mining industry been attempted and everywhere have they been successful?

Dance: Yes, the Satoshi Action Group is very ambitious. So in addition to the Arkansas bill, a very similar law took effect in Montana last year, and the Satoshi Fund said it plans to pass several more this year. The Louisiana House recently unanimously passed a similar bill. A bill is also being developed in Missouri. But there are other places where the bills face stronger headwinds. In Indiana and Georgia, I think the bills are unlikely to pass, or at least considered unlikely to pass. And in North Carolina, there is also strong reluctance. And the reactions are usually along the lines of: why would we proactively protect this industry over any other industry? Which I think is a smart question to ask.

Jamali: So Gabriel, what’s next? Are we going to see more of these bills?

Dance: I think most of the bills that were supposed to be introduced were introduced. That said, the Satoshi Action Fund continues to lobby lawmakers at the federal and state levels on the issue, using many of the same arguments that, at least in Arkansas, have either failed, such as jobs, or caused quite serious consequences. problems for local communities.

More about this

Although the Satoshi Action Fund did not respond to our request for comment, we reached out to the nonprofit Earthjustice, which has represented community groups across the country pursuing cryptocurrency mining operations. We spoke with Mandy DeRoche, Deputy General Counsel for the Clean Energy Program. Here is his statement:

We’ve seen across the United States how energy-intensive cryptocurrency mining is straining power grids, restarting and decommissioning dirty coal and gas plants, raising electricity rates for thousands of years. others, increases local air and water pollution and is as noisy as planes about to take off. Crypto miners do not need incentives, special rights or special protections at the expense of real people in affected communities. Crypto miners already face virtually no oversight or regulation. The Arkansas Legislature and Arkansas residents learned this the hard way. Policymakers in other states should understand the true impacts and externalities of this industry, local communities and the environment and not fall into the same trap.

Mandy DeRoche, deputy general counsel for Earthjustice’s Clean Energy Program

Even though Arkansas has rolled back some of its protections against cryptocurrency mining, Oklahoma recently passed its own right to mine bill which will come into force next November. The law provides cryptocurrency miners with similar protections against local restrictions.

Meanwhile, the Biden administration issued an order demanding MineOne, the owners of this Wyoming crypto mining data center, Gabriel mentioned, close and sell the mine. MineOne is majority owned by Chinese nationals.

Fuente

We are the editorial team of Blockchainbulletin, where seriousness meets clarity in cryptocurrency analysis. With a robust team of finance and blockchain technology experts, we are dedicated to meticulously exploring complex crypto markets with detailed assessments and an unbiased approach. Our mission is to democratize access to knowledge of emerging financial technologies, ensuring they are understandable and accessible to all. In every article on Blockchainbulletin, we strive to provide content that not only educates, but also empowers our readers, facilitating their integration into the financial digital age.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Información básica sobre protección de datos Ver más

  • Responsable: Miguel Mamador.
  • Finalidad:  Moderar los comentarios.
  • Legitimación:  Por consentimiento del interesado.
  • Destinatarios y encargados de tratamiento:  No se ceden o comunican datos a terceros para prestar este servicio. El Titular ha contratado los servicios de alojamiento web a Banahosting que actúa como encargado de tratamiento.
  • Derechos: Acceder, rectificar y suprimir los datos.
  • Información Adicional: Puede consultar la información detallada en la Política de Privacidad.

Regulation

Crypto community gets involved in anti-government protests in Nigeria

BlockChainBulletin Staff

Published

on

Crypto Community Engages in Nigeria's Governance Protests

Amid the #EndBadGovernanceInNigeria protests in Nigeria, a notable shift is occurring within the country’s cryptocurrency sector. As the general public demands sweeping governance reforms, crypto community leaders are seizing the opportunity to advocate for specific regulatory changes.

Rume Ophi, former secretary of the Blockchain Stakeholders Association of Nigeria (SiBAN), stressed the critical need to integrate crypto-focused demands into the broader agenda of the protests.

Ophi explained the dual benefit of such requirements, noting that proper regulation can spur substantial economic growth by attracting investors and creating job opportunities. Ophi noted, “Including calls for favorable crypto regulations is not just about the crypto community; it’s about leveraging these technologies to foster broader economic prosperity.”

Existing government efforts

In opposition to Ophi’s call for action, Chimezie Chuta, chair of the National Blockchain Policy Steering Committee, presents a different view. He pointed out The Nigerian government continued efforts to nurture the blockchain and cryptocurrency industries.

According to Chuta, the creation of a steering committee was essential to effectively address the needs of the crypto community.

Chuta also highlighted the creation of a subcommittee to harmonize regulations for virtual asset service providers (VASPs). With the aim of streamlining operations and providing clear regulatory direction, the initiative involves cooperation with major organizations including the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN). “Our efforts should mitigate the need for protest as substantial progress is being made to address the needs of the crypto industry,” Chuta said.

A united call for support

The ongoing dialogue between the crypto community and government agencies reflects a complex landscape of negotiations and demands for progress.

While actors like Ophi are calling for more direct action and the inclusion of crypto demands in protest agendas, government figures like Chuta are advocating for recognition of the steps already taken.

As protests continue, the crypto community’s push for regulatory reform highlights a crucial aspect of Nigeria’s broader fight to improve governance and economic policies. Both sides agree that favorable regulations are critical to the successful adoption and implementation of blockchain technologies, signaling a potentially transformative era for Nigeria’s economic framework.

Read also : OKX Exchange Exits Nigerian Market Amid Regulatory Crackdown

Fuente

Continue Reading

Regulation

Cryptocurrency Regulations in Slovenia 2024

BlockChainBulletin Staff

Published

on

Cryptocurrency Regulations in Slovenia 2024

Slovenia, a small but highly developed European country with a population of 2.1 million, boasts a rich industrial history that has contributed greatly to its strong economy. As the most economically developed Slavic nation, Slovenia has grown steadily since adopting the euro in 2007. Its openness to innovation has been a key factor in its success in the industrial sector, making it a prime destination for cryptocurrency enthusiasts. Many believe that Slovenia is poised to become a powerful fintech hub in Europe. But does its current regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies support such aspirations?

Let’s explore Slovenia’s cryptocurrency regulations and see if they can propel the country to the forefront of the cryptocurrency landscape. My expectations are positive. What are yours? Before we answer, let’s dig a little deeper.

1. Cryptocurrency regulation in Slovenia: an overview

Slovenia is renowned for its innovation-friendly stance, providing a supportive environment for emerging technologies such as blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Under the Payment Services and Systems Act, cryptocurrencies are classified as virtual assets rather than financial or monetary instruments.

The regulation of the cryptocurrency sector in Slovenia is decentralized. Different authorities manage different aspects of the ecosystem. For example, the Bank of Slovenia and the Securities Market Agency oversee cryptocurrency transactions to ensure compliance with financial laws, including anti-money laundering (AML) and terrorist financing regulations. The Slovenian Act on the Prevention of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing (ZPPDFT-2) incorporates the EU’s 5th Anti-Money Laundering Directive (5MLD) and aligns with the latest FATF recommendations. All virtual currency service providers must register with the Office of the Republic of Slovenia.

2. Cryptocurrency regulation in Slovenia: what’s new?

Several notable developments have taken place this year in the cryptocurrency sector in Slovenia:

July 25, 2024:Slovenia has issued a €30 million on-chain digital sovereign bond, the first of its kind in the EU, with a yield of 3.65%, maturing on 25 November 2024.

May 14, 2024:NiceHash has announced the first Slovenian Bitcoin-focused conference, NiceHashX, scheduled for November 8-9 in Maribor.

3. Explanation of the tax framework for cryptocurrencies in Slovenia

The Slovenian cryptocurrency tax framework provides clear guidelines for individuals and businesses. According to the Slovenian Financial Administration, the tax treatment depends on the status of the trader and the nature of the transaction.

  • People:Income earned from cryptocurrencies through employment or ongoing business activities is subject to personal income tax. However, capital gains from transactions or market fluctuations are exempt from tax.
  • Companies:Capital gains from cryptocurrency-related activities are subject to a 19% corporate tax. Value-added tax (VAT) generally applies at a rate of 22%, although cryptocurrency transactions that are considered as means of payment are exempt from VAT. Companies are not allowed to limit payment methods to cryptocurrencies alone. Tokens issued during ICOs must follow standard accounting rules and corporate tax law.

4. Cryptocurrency Mining in Slovenia: What You Need to Know

Cryptocurrency mining is not restricted in Slovenia, but income from mining is considered business income and is therefore taxable. This includes rewards from validating transactions and any additional income from mining operations. Both individuals and legal entities must comply with Slovenian tax regulations.

5. Timeline of the development of cryptocurrency regulation in Slovenia

Here is a timeline highlighting the evolution of cryptocurrency regulations in Slovenia:

  • 2013:The Slovenian Financial Administration has issued guidelines stating that income from cryptocurrency transactions should be taxed.
  • 2017:The Slovenian Financial Administration has provided more detailed guidelines on cryptocurrency taxation, depending on factors such as the status of the trader and the type of transaction.
  • 2023:The EU adopted the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) Regulation, establishing a uniform regulatory framework for crypto-assets, their issuers and service providers across the EU.

Endnote

Slovenia’s approach to the cryptocurrency sector is commendable, reflecting its optimistic view of the future of cryptocurrencies. The country’s balanced regulatory framework supports cryptocurrency innovation while protecting users’ rights and preventing illegal activities. Recent developments demonstrate Slovenia’s commitment to continually improving its regulatory environment. Slovenia’s cryptocurrency regulatory framework sets a positive example for other nations navigating the evolving cryptocurrency landscape.

Read also : Hong Kong Cryptocurrency Regulations 2024

Fuente

Continue Reading

Regulation

A Blank Sheet for Cryptocurrencies: Kamala Harris’ Regulatory Opportunity

BlockChainBulletin Staff

Published

on

A Blank Sheet for Cryptocurrencies: Kamala Harris' Regulatory Opportunity

photo by Shubham Dhage on Unsplash

As the cryptocurrency landscape continues to evolve, the need for clear regulation has never been more pressing.

With Vice President Kamala Harris now leading the charge on digital asset regulation in the United States, this represents a unique opportunity to start fresh. This fresh start can foster innovation and protect consumers. It can also pave the way for widespread adoption across industries, including real estate agencies, healthcare providers, and online gaming platforms like these. online casinos ukAccording to experts at SafestCasinoSites, these platforms come with benefits such as bonus offers, a wide selection of games, and various payment methods. Ultimately, all this increase in adoption could propel the cryptocurrency market forward.

With this in mind, let’s look at the current state of cryptocurrency regulation in the United States, a complex and confusing landscape. Multiple agencies, including the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), have overlapping jurisdictions, creating a fragmented regulatory environment. This lack of clarity has stifled innovation as companies are reluctant to invest in the United States, fearing regulatory repercussions. A coherent and clear regulatory framework is urgently needed to realize the full potential of cryptocurrencies in the United States.

While the US struggles to find its footing, other countries, such as Singapore and the UK, are actively looking into the cryptocurrency sector by adopting clear and supportive regulatory frameworks. This has led to a brain drain, with companies choosing to locate in more conducive environments.

Vice President Kamala Harris has a unique opportunity to change that narrative and start over. Regulation of cryptocurrencies. By taking a comprehensive and inclusive approach, it can help create a framework that balances consumer protection with innovation and growth. The time has come for clear and effective regulation of cryptocurrencies in the United States.

Effective regulation of digital assets is essential to foster a safe and innovative environment. The key principles guiding this regulation are clarity, innovation, global cooperation, consumer protection, and flexibility. Clear definitions and guidelines eliminate ambiguity while encouraging experimentation and development to ensure progress. Collaboration with international partners establishes consistent standards, preventing regulatory arbitrage. Strong safeguards protect consumers from fraud and market abuse, and adaptability allows for evolution in response to emerging trends and technologies, striking a balance between innovation and protection.

The benefits of effective cryptocurrency regulation are multiple and far-reaching. By establishing clear guidelines, governments can attract investors and mainstream users, driving growth and adoption. This can, in turn, position countries like the United States as global leaders in fintech and innovation. Strong safeguards will also increase consumer confidence in digital assets and related products, increasing economic activity.

A thriving crypto industry can contribute significantly to GDP and job creation, which has a positive impact on the overall economy. Furthermore, effective regulation has paved the way for the growth of many businesses such as tech startups, online casinos, and pharmaceutical companies, demonstrating that clear guidelines can open up new opportunities without stifling innovation. This is a great example of how regulation can allay fears of regressive policies, even if Kamala Harris does not repeal the current progressive approach. By adopting effective regulation, governments can create fertile ground for the crypto industry to thrive, thereby promoting progress and prosperity.

Fuente

Continue Reading

Regulation

South Korea Imposes New ‘Monitoring’ Fees on Cryptocurrency Exchanges

BlockChainBulletin Staff

Published

on

South Korea Imposes New 'Monitoring' Fees on Cryptocurrency Exchanges

Big news! The latest regulatory changes in South Korea are expected to impact major cryptocurrency exchanges like Upbit and Bithumb. Under the updated regulations, these platforms will now have to pay monitoring fees, which could cause problems for some exchanges.

Overview of new fees

In the latest move to regulate cryptocurrencies, the Financial Services Commission announced on July 1 the revised “Enforcement Order of the Act on the Establishment of the Financial Services Commission, etc.” update “Regulations on the collection of contributions from financial institutions, etc.” According to local legislation newsThe regulations require virtual asset operators to pay supervisory fees for inspections conducted by the Financial Supervisory Service starting next year. The total fees for the four major exchanges are estimated at around 300 million won, or about $220,000.

Apportionment of costs

Upbit, which holds a dominant market share, is expected to bear more than 90% of the total fee, or about 272 million won ($199,592) based on its operating revenue. Bithumb will pay about 21.14 million won ($155,157), while Coinone and GOPAX will contribute about 6.03 million won ($4,422) and 830,000 won ($608), respectively. Korbit is excluded from this fee due to its lower operating revenue.

Impact on the industry

The supervision fee will function similarly to a quasi-tax for financial institutions subject to inspections by the Financial Supervisory Service. The new law requires any company with a turnover of 3 billion won or more to pay the fee.

In the past, fees for electronic financial companies and P2P investment firms were phased in over three years. However, the taxation of virtual asset operators has been accelerated, reflecting the rapid growth of the cryptocurrency market and increasing regulatory scrutiny.

Industry reactions

The rapid introduction of the fee was unexpected by some industry players, who had expected a delay. Financial Supervisory Service officials justified the decision by citing the creation of the body concerned and the costs already incurred.

While larger exchanges like Upbit and Bithumb can afford the cost, smaller exchanges like Coinone and GOPAX, which are currently operating at a loss, could face an additional financial burden. This is part of a broader trend of declining trading volumes for South Korean exchanges, which have seen a 30% drop since the new law went into effect.

Fuente

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 BLOCKCHAINBULLETIN.ORG. All rights reserved. This website provides educational content and highlights that investing involves risks. It is essential to conduct thorough research before investing and to be prepared to assume potential losses. Be sure to fully understand the risks involved before making investment decisions. Important: We do not provide financial or investment advice. All content is presented for educational purposes only.