Regulation
Sen. Bryan King hopes to bring up stricter crypto mining regulations in upcoming special session
Brian ChilsonSen. Bryan King (R-Green Forest)
Senator Bryan King (R-Green Forrest) said today that he will again propose stricter regulations on crypto mining when the Legislature meets in a special session soon.
King said he alerted Senate President Pro Tem Bart Hester And House Speaker Matthew Shepherd of his projects. He emphasized recent news that the federal government stepped in to shut down a crypto mining company in Wyoming that has ties to China, one reason the issue deserves another hearing as soon as possible.
King’s proposals for strict regulation of crypto mining below during the legislative budget session that ended earlier this month. The legislature instead passed another pair of bills aimed at addressing the various nuisances and concerns surrounding crypto mining, which have now been signed into law by the governor. However, King argued that the bills had major flaws and were largely bogus efforts to quell controversy around crypto mining while remaining too industry-friendly.
King has an opportunity to try again given that a special session will likely be called next month. Due to a combination of legislative incompetence and shenanigansa hubbub around a proposed increase in Game and Fish Commission The director’s salary led to the failure to pass a budget for the commission. This puts the entire agency in limbo for the new fiscal year, beginning July 1, so the Legislature will almost certainly convene for a special session called by the governor to pass this budget. The special session will likely cost taxpayers about $100,000.
Republican legislative leaders have already suggested that they would like to take the opportunity to pass even more tax cuts, heavily targeted at the rich. Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders will almost certainly favor this idea, but she will just as surely not like the idea of repeating King’s proposals.
If the issue of cryptocurrency mining is not on the agenda when the governor calls a special session, it would require two-thirds approval in both houses of the Legislature to even consider King’s proposals. It was the same obstacle King faced during the fiscal session. During a fiscal session, non-budget proposals also require two-thirds approval in the House and Senate. King’s list of six proposals gained the necessary approval in the Senate, but failed to make it through the House. Most House Democrats refused to vote to consider King’s proposals. for reasons that seem fragile. They proved to be the decisive obstacle that prevented several resolutions from being heard.
Crypto “mining” is the process by which Bitcoin confirms transactions and creates new Bitcoins, using a network of high-powered computers. Unfortunately, this very lucrative industry is noisy and harmful to the environment. Cryptocurrency mines have often proven to be a major problem for the rural communities where they have emerged.
Critics have also raised concerns about whether the mines could pose a threat to national security due to crypto mining companies with ties to China.
Law 851 of 2023which would have been written largely by the Satoshi Group – a dark money crypto advocacy group – has significantly reduced the ability of Arkansas cities and counties to regulate the industry, giving crypto companies a leg up on communities affected by nuisance they cause. It caused an outcry, sparked local and national media reports and sparked a deluge of constituent complaints to lawmakers in affected – usually rural – areas.
The co-sponsors of Law 851, Senator Joshua Bryant (R-Rogers) and Representative Rick McClure (R-Malvern), were also co-sponsors of the new bills that eventually became law, which only increased the fears of critics like King that their main fears would not be addressed and that the new laws were like lipstick on a pig.
“I don’t let the same man take me snipe hunting twice.” Representative Josh Miller (R-Heber Springs) commented during a committee hearing, when asked why he didn’t trust Bryant and McClure to fix the problem they caused.
The new laws essentially restore local control over regulation and establish a new national regulatory and licensing system for cryptocurrency mines. This is almost certainly an improvement over Law 851, and better than nothing. (And for those interested in national security, they impose limits on foreign ownership for designated countries like China.)
But they still have some holes and open questions, and do not go as far as King’s proposals would have done. The fact that the cryptocurrency mining industry is publicly applauding the measures is another red flag for critics.
At the same time, the New York Times reports that the federal government appears to have real concerns about crypto mines with ties to China:
President Biden on Monday ordered a Chinese company to close and sell the Wyoming cryptocurrency mine it built a mile from an Air Force base that controls missiles intercontinental ballistic missiles with nuclear weapons.
The cryptomining facility, which operates high-powered computers in a data center near the FE Warren Base in Cheyenne, “poses a risk to the national security of the United States,” the president said in a statement. decreebecause its equipment could be used for surveillance and espionage purposes.
“The vast majority of machines that power cryptomining operations in the United States are made by Chinese companies,” the Times reports, a point that will likely be raised by King, who had targeted such equipment in his proposals.
King’s resolutions would also have imposed fees on cryptocurrency mines for overusing electricity, with a fee schedule based on megawatts exceeding certain thresholds. The crypto lobby claims this would shut down crypto mining operations, which seems telling in itself.
King’s proposals included various other stricter regulations, such as fully repealing Act 851, restoring local control for counties and cities to regulate crypto mining without limitations (including noise ordinances ), banning ownership by certain foreign nationals (again, China is clearly the primary target), fleshing out regulatory requirements for new or existing crypto mines operating in the state, requiring companies to file a six months’ notice before purchasing or leasing land for a crypto mine, monitoring water consumption and allowing the state to take action against a mine if critical groundwater supplies have been threatened, and more .
Expect a similar set of proposals from King when the special session convenes.
“I will work to pass real legislation to protect Arkansans,” King said in a tweet. “During the last session, professional crypto industry sponsors failed to answer simple and straightforward questions. Other lawmakers also failed to be factual.”
Here are more excerpts from the Times report, released Monday:
Chinese-owned cryptocurrency mines have boomed in the United States since the facilities were effectively banned in China in 2021. Although some cryptomining activities have since restarted in China, Chinese crypto entrepreneurs are attracted to United States for its relatively cheap electricity and well-developed legal system. system.
The Times found Chinese-owned or operated Bitcoin mines in at least 12 states, including Arkansas, Ohio, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas and Wyoming, which together consume as much energy as 1.5 million homes. Some are owned by people or companies with ties to the Chinese government or the Communist Party. Until recently, the main supplier of mining equipment operated from an office in a Communist Party facility on Hainan Island, the Times found.
Regulation
Crypto community gets involved in anti-government protests in Nigeria
Amid the #EndBadGovernanceInNigeria protests in Nigeria, a notable shift is occurring within the country’s cryptocurrency sector. As the general public demands sweeping governance reforms, crypto community leaders are seizing the opportunity to advocate for specific regulatory changes.
Rume Ophi, former secretary of the Blockchain Stakeholders Association of Nigeria (SiBAN), stressed the critical need to integrate crypto-focused demands into the broader agenda of the protests.
Ophi explained the dual benefit of such requirements, noting that proper regulation can spur substantial economic growth by attracting investors and creating job opportunities. Ophi noted, “Including calls for favorable crypto regulations is not just about the crypto community; it’s about leveraging these technologies to foster broader economic prosperity.”
Existing government efforts
In opposition to Ophi’s call for action, Chimezie Chuta, chair of the National Blockchain Policy Steering Committee, presents a different view. He pointed out The Nigerian government continued efforts to nurture the blockchain and cryptocurrency industries.
According to Chuta, the creation of a steering committee was essential to effectively address the needs of the crypto community.
Chuta also highlighted the creation of a subcommittee to harmonize regulations for virtual asset service providers (VASPs). With the aim of streamlining operations and providing clear regulatory direction, the initiative involves cooperation with major organizations including the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN). “Our efforts should mitigate the need for protest as substantial progress is being made to address the needs of the crypto industry,” Chuta said.
A united call for support
The ongoing dialogue between the crypto community and government agencies reflects a complex landscape of negotiations and demands for progress.
While actors like Ophi are calling for more direct action and the inclusion of crypto demands in protest agendas, government figures like Chuta are advocating for recognition of the steps already taken.
As protests continue, the crypto community’s push for regulatory reform highlights a crucial aspect of Nigeria’s broader fight to improve governance and economic policies. Both sides agree that favorable regulations are critical to the successful adoption and implementation of blockchain technologies, signaling a potentially transformative era for Nigeria’s economic framework.
Read also : OKX Exchange Exits Nigerian Market Amid Regulatory Crackdown
Regulation
Cryptocurrency Regulations in Slovenia 2024
Slovenia, a small but highly developed European country with a population of 2.1 million, boasts a rich industrial history that has contributed greatly to its strong economy. As the most economically developed Slavic nation, Slovenia has grown steadily since adopting the euro in 2007. Its openness to innovation has been a key factor in its success in the industrial sector, making it a prime destination for cryptocurrency enthusiasts. Many believe that Slovenia is poised to become a powerful fintech hub in Europe. But does its current regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies support such aspirations?
Let’s explore Slovenia’s cryptocurrency regulations and see if they can propel the country to the forefront of the cryptocurrency landscape. My expectations are positive. What are yours? Before we answer, let’s dig a little deeper.
1. Cryptocurrency regulation in Slovenia: an overview
Slovenia is renowned for its innovation-friendly stance, providing a supportive environment for emerging technologies such as blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Under the Payment Services and Systems Act, cryptocurrencies are classified as virtual assets rather than financial or monetary instruments.
The regulation of the cryptocurrency sector in Slovenia is decentralized. Different authorities manage different aspects of the ecosystem. For example, the Bank of Slovenia and the Securities Market Agency oversee cryptocurrency transactions to ensure compliance with financial laws, including anti-money laundering (AML) and terrorist financing regulations. The Slovenian Act on the Prevention of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing (ZPPDFT-2) incorporates the EU’s 5th Anti-Money Laundering Directive (5MLD) and aligns with the latest FATF recommendations. All virtual currency service providers must register with the Office of the Republic of Slovenia.
2. Cryptocurrency regulation in Slovenia: what’s new?
Several notable developments have taken place this year in the cryptocurrency sector in Slovenia:
July 25, 2024:Slovenia has issued a €30 million on-chain digital sovereign bond, the first of its kind in the EU, with a yield of 3.65%, maturing on 25 November 2024.
May 14, 2024:NiceHash has announced the first Slovenian Bitcoin-focused conference, NiceHashX, scheduled for November 8-9 in Maribor.
3. Explanation of the tax framework for cryptocurrencies in Slovenia
The Slovenian cryptocurrency tax framework provides clear guidelines for individuals and businesses. According to the Slovenian Financial Administration, the tax treatment depends on the status of the trader and the nature of the transaction.
- People:Income earned from cryptocurrencies through employment or ongoing business activities is subject to personal income tax. However, capital gains from transactions or market fluctuations are exempt from tax.
- Companies:Capital gains from cryptocurrency-related activities are subject to a 19% corporate tax. Value-added tax (VAT) generally applies at a rate of 22%, although cryptocurrency transactions that are considered as means of payment are exempt from VAT. Companies are not allowed to limit payment methods to cryptocurrencies alone. Tokens issued during ICOs must follow standard accounting rules and corporate tax law.
4. Cryptocurrency Mining in Slovenia: What You Need to Know
Cryptocurrency mining is not restricted in Slovenia, but income from mining is considered business income and is therefore taxable. This includes rewards from validating transactions and any additional income from mining operations. Both individuals and legal entities must comply with Slovenian tax regulations.
5. Timeline of the development of cryptocurrency regulation in Slovenia
Here is a timeline highlighting the evolution of cryptocurrency regulations in Slovenia:
- 2013:The Slovenian Financial Administration has issued guidelines stating that income from cryptocurrency transactions should be taxed.
- 2017:The Slovenian Financial Administration has provided more detailed guidelines on cryptocurrency taxation, depending on factors such as the status of the trader and the type of transaction.
- 2023:The EU adopted the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) Regulation, establishing a uniform regulatory framework for crypto-assets, their issuers and service providers across the EU.
Endnote
Slovenia’s approach to the cryptocurrency sector is commendable, reflecting its optimistic view of the future of cryptocurrencies. The country’s balanced regulatory framework supports cryptocurrency innovation while protecting users’ rights and preventing illegal activities. Recent developments demonstrate Slovenia’s commitment to continually improving its regulatory environment. Slovenia’s cryptocurrency regulatory framework sets a positive example for other nations navigating the evolving cryptocurrency landscape.
Read also : Hong Kong Cryptocurrency Regulations 2024
Regulation
A Blank Sheet for Cryptocurrencies: Kamala Harris’ Regulatory Opportunity
photo by Shubham Dhage on Unsplash
As the cryptocurrency landscape continues to evolve, the need for clear regulation has never been more pressing.
With Vice President Kamala Harris now leading the charge on digital asset regulation in the United States, this represents a unique opportunity to start fresh. This fresh start can foster innovation and protect consumers. It can also pave the way for widespread adoption across industries, including real estate agencies, healthcare providers, and online gaming platforms like these. online casinos ukAccording to experts at SafestCasinoSites, these platforms come with benefits such as bonus offers, a wide selection of games, and various payment methods. Ultimately, all this increase in adoption could propel the cryptocurrency market forward.
With this in mind, let’s look at the current state of cryptocurrency regulation in the United States, a complex and confusing landscape. Multiple agencies, including the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), have overlapping jurisdictions, creating a fragmented regulatory environment. This lack of clarity has stifled innovation as companies are reluctant to invest in the United States, fearing regulatory repercussions. A coherent and clear regulatory framework is urgently needed to realize the full potential of cryptocurrencies in the United States.
While the US struggles to find its footing, other countries, such as Singapore and the UK, are actively looking into the cryptocurrency sector by adopting clear and supportive regulatory frameworks. This has led to a brain drain, with companies choosing to locate in more conducive environments.
Vice President Kamala Harris has a unique opportunity to change that narrative and start over. Regulation of cryptocurrencies. By taking a comprehensive and inclusive approach, it can help create a framework that balances consumer protection with innovation and growth. The time has come for clear and effective regulation of cryptocurrencies in the United States.
Effective regulation of digital assets is essential to foster a safe and innovative environment. The key principles guiding this regulation are clarity, innovation, global cooperation, consumer protection, and flexibility. Clear definitions and guidelines eliminate ambiguity while encouraging experimentation and development to ensure progress. Collaboration with international partners establishes consistent standards, preventing regulatory arbitrage. Strong safeguards protect consumers from fraud and market abuse, and adaptability allows for evolution in response to emerging trends and technologies, striking a balance between innovation and protection.
The benefits of effective cryptocurrency regulation are multiple and far-reaching. By establishing clear guidelines, governments can attract investors and mainstream users, driving growth and adoption. This can, in turn, position countries like the United States as global leaders in fintech and innovation. Strong safeguards will also increase consumer confidence in digital assets and related products, increasing economic activity.
A thriving crypto industry can contribute significantly to GDP and job creation, which has a positive impact on the overall economy. Furthermore, effective regulation has paved the way for the growth of many businesses such as tech startups, online casinos, and pharmaceutical companies, demonstrating that clear guidelines can open up new opportunities without stifling innovation. This is a great example of how regulation can allay fears of regressive policies, even if Kamala Harris does not repeal the current progressive approach. By adopting effective regulation, governments can create fertile ground for the crypto industry to thrive, thereby promoting progress and prosperity.
Regulation
South Korea Imposes New ‘Monitoring’ Fees on Cryptocurrency Exchanges
Big news! The latest regulatory changes in South Korea are expected to impact major cryptocurrency exchanges like Upbit and Bithumb. Under the updated regulations, these platforms will now have to pay monitoring fees, which could cause problems for some exchanges.
Overview of new fees
In the latest move to regulate cryptocurrencies, the Financial Services Commission announced on July 1 the revised “Enforcement Order of the Act on the Establishment of the Financial Services Commission, etc.” update “Regulations on the collection of contributions from financial institutions, etc.” According to local legislation newsThe regulations require virtual asset operators to pay supervisory fees for inspections conducted by the Financial Supervisory Service starting next year. The total fees for the four major exchanges are estimated at around 300 million won, or about $220,000.
Apportionment of costs
Upbit, which holds a dominant market share, is expected to bear more than 90% of the total fee, or about 272 million won ($199,592) based on its operating revenue. Bithumb will pay about 21.14 million won ($155,157), while Coinone and GOPAX will contribute about 6.03 million won ($4,422) and 830,000 won ($608), respectively. Korbit is excluded from this fee due to its lower operating revenue.
Impact on the industry
The supervision fee will function similarly to a quasi-tax for financial institutions subject to inspections by the Financial Supervisory Service. The new law requires any company with a turnover of 3 billion won or more to pay the fee.
In the past, fees for electronic financial companies and P2P investment firms were phased in over three years. However, the taxation of virtual asset operators has been accelerated, reflecting the rapid growth of the cryptocurrency market and increasing regulatory scrutiny.
Industry reactions
The rapid introduction of the fee was unexpected by some industry players, who had expected a delay. Financial Supervisory Service officials justified the decision by citing the creation of the body concerned and the costs already incurred.
While larger exchanges like Upbit and Bithumb can afford the cost, smaller exchanges like Coinone and GOPAX, which are currently operating at a loss, could face an additional financial burden. This is part of a broader trend of declining trading volumes for South Korean exchanges, which have seen a 30% drop since the new law went into effect.
-
Regulation7 months ago
Ripple CTO and Cardano founder clash over XRP’s regulatory challenges ⋆ ZyCrypto
-
Regulation5 months ago
Nancy Pelosi Considers Supporting Republican Crypto Bill FIT21 – London Business News
-
Videos6 months ago
Cryptocurrency News: Bitcoin, ETH ETF, AI Crypto Rally, AKT, TON & MORE!!
-
Regulation6 months ago
Bitcoin’s future is ‘bleak’ and ripe for regulation, says lead developer
-
News6 months ago
The trader earned $46 million with PEPE after reaching a new ATH
-
Blockchain6 months ago
Solana ranks the fastest blockchain in the world, surpassing Ethereum, Polygon ⋆ ZyCrypto
-
Blockchain6 months ago
Solana Surpasses Ethereum and Polygon as the Fastest Blockchain ⋆ ZyCrypto
-
Regulation6 months ago
🔒 Crypto needs regulation to thrive: Tyler Cowen
-
Videos6 months ago
Who Really CONTROLS THE MARKETS!! Her plans REVEALED!!
-
Videos7 months ago
Kucoin safe?? Exchange REVIEW and beginner’s guide!!
-
Blockchain6 months ago
“Liquid vesting” is an oxymoronic feature of blockchain that allows early investors to sell without waiting
-
Videos6 months ago
Institutions purchasing MEMECOINS?! Everything you need to know!