Regulation

Cryptocurrency triumphs as SEC drops stablecoin case

Published

on

In a major shift in the Bitcoin space, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently decided to stop overseeing Paxos, a New York-based stablecoin issuer.

Presented by Jorge Tenreiro, acting head of the SEC’s Crypto Assets and Cybersecurity Unit, the statement suggests that Paxos will not be subject to any enforcement action.

Initial Investigation and Allegations

The completion of this research signifies a possible change in the regulatory landscape for stablecoins, typically digital assets pegged and backed by stable sources like the U.S. dollar.

Investigations into Paxos began after the SEC issued a Wells Notice in February 2023, citing potential enforcement action related to the BUSD stablecoin, which Paxos issues for Binance.

Allegations that BUSD, which is pegged to the U.S. dollar, should be considered an investment contract and therefore a security led the SEC to investigate.

Source: Paxos

This was based on the idea that, given the expectation of profits, income from BUSD reserves was distributed to Binance users as yields, thus classifying them as securities.

On June 28, however, the regulatory view changed, following a federal court ruling in favor of Binance. The court ruled that the BUSD sales did not constitute an offering of securities, dismissing the allegations of securities law violations.

This legal triumph for Binance This appears to have influenced the SEC’s subsequent choice to withdraw its initial charges against Paxos.

The results of this study not only shed light on the regulatory situation of BUSD, but also help Paxos a lot. Walter Hessert, Head of Strategy at Paxos, expressed his great relief and hope in an interview following the decision.

He noted that the closure of the SEC investigation has cleared a large cloud of uncertainty that had hung over the company for more than a year, hampering potential alliances and expansion prospects, particularly with larger companies like PayPal.

Consequences for the stablecoin industry

Maintaining its usual caution, the SEC declined to comment on the conclusion of the investigation, continuing its policy of not releasing the findings of ongoing or finalized investigations.

This silence is consistent with the agency’s past approach to regulatory oversight of newly developed financial technologies.

The stablecoin industry, which includes other well-known companies such as PayPal and VanEck, is riding on this development. The industry has negotiated a difficult regulatory environment lack of clear legislative direction despite its expansion.

Congress has yet to pass any specific legislation specifically addressing the growing class of digital assets, leaving many legal and practical questions about stablecoins in a regulatory gray area.

Traditionally, securities are distinguished by money invested in a joint venture with a realistic expectation of reward from the work of others. Stablecoins like BUSD, which are supposed to maintain parity with the dollar rather than generate returns, may defy simple classification.

Potential for regulatory clarification

This natural variation has inspired discussions about whether stablecoins belong to a unique new class of financial tools or should be regulated as securities.

Given that the SEC’s latest decision could set a standard for how comparable issues will be handled in the future, it could encourage even more regulatory clarity.

Additionally, it could encourage other companies to join the stablecoin market or expand their current operations, supporting the expansion of the industry in the United States and possibly elsewhere.

The outcome of the Paxos case is likely to influence the entire bitcoin industry, potentially pushing companies to jurisdictions with clearer regulatory environments or requiring them to develop new products in those locations.

“Each legislative decision made as the field evolves will be widely observed and could influence the future direction of how digital assets are viewed, controlled and included in the global financial system.”

Fuente

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Información básica sobre protección de datos Ver más

  • Responsable: Miguel Mamador.
  • Finalidad:  Moderar los comentarios.
  • Legitimación:  Por consentimiento del interesado.
  • Destinatarios y encargados de tratamiento:  No se ceden o comunican datos a terceros para prestar este servicio. El Titular ha contratado los servicios de alojamiento web a Banahosting que actúa como encargado de tratamiento.
  • Derechos: Acceder, rectificar y suprimir los datos.
  • Información Adicional: Puede consultar la información detallada en la Política de Privacidad.

Trending

Exit mobile version