Regulation
Financial justice advocates slam crypto regulation bill / Public News Service
Consumer advocates are opposing a bill to regulate the cryptocurrency market, saying it is a wolf in sheep’s clothing.
THE Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act would give regulatory authority to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission instead of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Mark Hays, senior policy analyst for the nonprofits Demand Progress and Americans for Financial Reform, said that would be a mistake.
“Basically, you’re creating a more permissive regulatory regime that allows crypto companies to essentially do what they do with some protection,” Hays pointed out. “But in reality, it doesn’t provide the same kind of protection that you get if you just treat them the way we do now.”
Supporters of the bill said it creates strong protections for consumers and provides regulatory certainty allowing the growing industry to thrive. The bill passed the House of Representatives last month with majority Republican votes, but also some support from progressive Democrats, including Rep. Robert Garcia, Democrat of California, Rep. Jimmy Gomez, Democrat of California, Rep. Sydney Kamlager-Dove, Democrat. California, Representative Ro Khanna, Democrat of California, Representative Mike Levin, Democrat of California, Representative Ted Lieu, Democrat of California and Representative Jimmy Panetta, Democrat of California.
Kevin Stein, chief legal and strategy officer at the nonprofit RISE Economy, said lawmakers should prioritize the needs of vulnerable consumers.
“There are all these horror stories and consumer violations, so we need regulation,” Stein argued. “The crypto industry has invested a lot of money and a lot of lobbying power to try to get the rules they want and that’s always a recipe for disaster.”
The US Senate will now consider whether to pass the bill.
Disclosure: Americans for Financial Reform contributes to our fund for reporting on policy and budget priorities, campaign finance reform/money in politics, and social justice. If you would like to help support news of public interest, Click here.
receive more stories like this by email
In a analysis of 100 cities across the United StatesCincinnati ranks 22nd for decreasing credit limits – not for the city itself, but for its residents.
Significant drops in the average credit limit can indicate where people are experiencing financial problems. According to Cassandra Happe, analyst at WalletHubWhen credit card issuers evaluate the profitability and risks of particular users, they may lower someone’s credit limit to reduce their own risk and increase their long-term profitability.
Happe said people should be aware of how lowering their credit limit can affect their overall financial well-being.
“Adjust your spending accordingly,” she said, “so you don’t hurt your long-term credit score by spending more when you have less to spend.”
She noted that Cincinnati has seen a considerable decline over the past year, with individual credit limits reduced by an average of more than 15%. In the same survey, Columbus, Toledo and Cleveland were near the middle of the rankings, 45th, 72nd and 80th, respectively.
Happe said this indicates that people manage their accounts well and that credit card issuers see no need to reduce these limits.
It’s a good idea,” she said, “for people to check their current credit limits and make sure their balances aren’t driving what’s called ‘credit utilization’ to a higher level than it would otherwise be.
“If you find that your balance is significantly higher than your limit,” she said, “you may want to focus on paying down that balance, to ensure that you are not going to incur a lot of damage to your credit rating.
The report shows that for accounts opened in the first quarter of this year, Cincinnati ranked 77th in average credit limit per user, indicating higher credit limits for these new account holders, compared to many other cities in the study.
This story was produced in association with Media in the Public Interest and funded in part by the George Gund Foundation.
receive more stories like this by email
A new online guide helps people in Connecticut and across the country recover from scams.
The Better Business Bureau Scam Survival Kit connects people with services that help them recover mentally and financially from scams. Research shows that after being scammed, people feel angry, anxious, stressed, and have feelings of anger. loss of trustworthy.
Kristen Johnson, communications director for the Better Business Bureau serving Connecticut, said they often feel isolated.
“A lot of them don’t even want to admit it to their closest friends and family,” Johnson said. “They feel so alone, like they’re the only ones who have experienced this and don’t realize that thousands and thousands of people have experienced the same scam, let alone all the different scams.”
She added that this can lead to a loss of confidence and feelings of shame and embarrassment. The Scam Survival Kit aims to encourage more people to report scams. One of the features in the kit is called Survivor Stories, featuring quotes from other people who have been victims of scams. People can also upload their own words of encouragement so more people feel comfortable sharing their experiences.
While most people think of individuals being scammed, Johnson pointed out that the Scam Survival Kit can also help businesses by focusing on data breaches.
“We talk about data breaches because it’s not only one of the most common types of scams targeting businesses, but also one of the most impactful,” Johnson noted. “Because obviously they can get financial information for the company and for the employees.”
Businesses lose money about 30% of the time they are targeted by fraudsters, far less than individuals likely to fall victim to scams. Businesses lose an average of $523 to fraudsters, compared to about $100 reported by consumers.
receive more stories like this by email
THE “AM Radio Law for Every Vehicle“Congress would now require all new cars in the United States to have AM radios, sparking debate in Missouri.
The legislation is supported by 60 bipartisan U.S. senators, including Rep. Josh Hawley, R-Mo. But the Consumer Technology Association criticizes it for its potential to raise vehicle costs and stifle innovation, especially as electric vehicles grow in popularity.
Gary Shapiro, CEO of the Consumer Technology Association, testified against the mandate before a House subcommittee. He highlighted the financial and technological burdens a mandate would impose on both automakers and consumers.
“AM radio is wonderful, but it shouldn’t be required in every car sold in the ‘eternal future’ because it’s a trade-off between safety and other features, and it costs money,” Shapiro argued. “This slows down the transition to electric cars.”
Supporters of the mandate responded. AM radio is crucial for emergency broadcasts, especially in rural areas where digital signals may be weak. Shapiro pointed out that integrating AM radios into electric vehicles is problematic due to battery signal interference, which would lead to costly redesigns and divert resources from other advancements.
For Missourians, especially those in rural areas who might rely more on AM radio for information, a mandate would present both benefits and challenges. While AM radio’s extended reach is valuable, Shapiro argued such a requirement could hamper the state’s broader efforts to transition to electric vehicles.
He added that the need for AM radio is diminishing with the advent of digital and streaming options, which many consumers now prefer.
“AM radio is not going away; we don’t think it should be a requirement,” Shapiro explained. “There are simpler solutions, for example, if you don’t buy a car with an AM radio, the car seller should disclose that. Or you can plug in an AM radio.”
Shapiro emphasized that a balanced approach is needed to electrify vehicles while satisfying the radio industry and respecting consumer choice and market dynamics.
Regulation
Crypto community gets involved in anti-government protests in Nigeria
Amid the #EndBadGovernanceInNigeria protests in Nigeria, a notable shift is occurring within the country’s cryptocurrency sector. As the general public demands sweeping governance reforms, crypto community leaders are seizing the opportunity to advocate for specific regulatory changes.
Rume Ophi, former secretary of the Blockchain Stakeholders Association of Nigeria (SiBAN), stressed the critical need to integrate crypto-focused demands into the broader agenda of the protests.
Ophi explained the dual benefit of such requirements, noting that proper regulation can spur substantial economic growth by attracting investors and creating job opportunities. Ophi noted, “Including calls for favorable crypto regulations is not just about the crypto community; it’s about leveraging these technologies to foster broader economic prosperity.”
Existing government efforts
In opposition to Ophi’s call for action, Chimezie Chuta, chair of the National Blockchain Policy Steering Committee, presents a different view. He pointed out The Nigerian government continued efforts to nurture the blockchain and cryptocurrency industries.
According to Chuta, the creation of a steering committee was essential to effectively address the needs of the crypto community.
Chuta also highlighted the creation of a subcommittee to harmonize regulations for virtual asset service providers (VASPs). With the aim of streamlining operations and providing clear regulatory direction, the initiative involves cooperation with major organizations including the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN). “Our efforts should mitigate the need for protest as substantial progress is being made to address the needs of the crypto industry,” Chuta said.
A united call for support
The ongoing dialogue between the crypto community and government agencies reflects a complex landscape of negotiations and demands for progress.
While actors like Ophi are calling for more direct action and the inclusion of crypto demands in protest agendas, government figures like Chuta are advocating for recognition of the steps already taken.
As protests continue, the crypto community’s push for regulatory reform highlights a crucial aspect of Nigeria’s broader fight to improve governance and economic policies. Both sides agree that favorable regulations are critical to the successful adoption and implementation of blockchain technologies, signaling a potentially transformative era for Nigeria’s economic framework.
Read also : OKX Exchange Exits Nigerian Market Amid Regulatory Crackdown
Regulation
Cryptocurrency Regulations in Slovenia 2024
Slovenia, a small but highly developed European country with a population of 2.1 million, boasts a rich industrial history that has contributed greatly to its strong economy. As the most economically developed Slavic nation, Slovenia has grown steadily since adopting the euro in 2007. Its openness to innovation has been a key factor in its success in the industrial sector, making it a prime destination for cryptocurrency enthusiasts. Many believe that Slovenia is poised to become a powerful fintech hub in Europe. But does its current regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies support such aspirations?
Let’s explore Slovenia’s cryptocurrency regulations and see if they can propel the country to the forefront of the cryptocurrency landscape. My expectations are positive. What are yours? Before we answer, let’s dig a little deeper.
1. Cryptocurrency regulation in Slovenia: an overview
Slovenia is renowned for its innovation-friendly stance, providing a supportive environment for emerging technologies such as blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Under the Payment Services and Systems Act, cryptocurrencies are classified as virtual assets rather than financial or monetary instruments.
The regulation of the cryptocurrency sector in Slovenia is decentralized. Different authorities manage different aspects of the ecosystem. For example, the Bank of Slovenia and the Securities Market Agency oversee cryptocurrency transactions to ensure compliance with financial laws, including anti-money laundering (AML) and terrorist financing regulations. The Slovenian Act on the Prevention of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing (ZPPDFT-2) incorporates the EU’s 5th Anti-Money Laundering Directive (5MLD) and aligns with the latest FATF recommendations. All virtual currency service providers must register with the Office of the Republic of Slovenia.
2. Cryptocurrency regulation in Slovenia: what’s new?
Several notable developments have taken place this year in the cryptocurrency sector in Slovenia:
July 25, 2024:Slovenia has issued a €30 million on-chain digital sovereign bond, the first of its kind in the EU, with a yield of 3.65%, maturing on 25 November 2024.
May 14, 2024:NiceHash has announced the first Slovenian Bitcoin-focused conference, NiceHashX, scheduled for November 8-9 in Maribor.
3. Explanation of the tax framework for cryptocurrencies in Slovenia
The Slovenian cryptocurrency tax framework provides clear guidelines for individuals and businesses. According to the Slovenian Financial Administration, the tax treatment depends on the status of the trader and the nature of the transaction.
- People:Income earned from cryptocurrencies through employment or ongoing business activities is subject to personal income tax. However, capital gains from transactions or market fluctuations are exempt from tax.
- Companies:Capital gains from cryptocurrency-related activities are subject to a 19% corporate tax. Value-added tax (VAT) generally applies at a rate of 22%, although cryptocurrency transactions that are considered as means of payment are exempt from VAT. Companies are not allowed to limit payment methods to cryptocurrencies alone. Tokens issued during ICOs must follow standard accounting rules and corporate tax law.
4. Cryptocurrency Mining in Slovenia: What You Need to Know
Cryptocurrency mining is not restricted in Slovenia, but income from mining is considered business income and is therefore taxable. This includes rewards from validating transactions and any additional income from mining operations. Both individuals and legal entities must comply with Slovenian tax regulations.
5. Timeline of the development of cryptocurrency regulation in Slovenia
Here is a timeline highlighting the evolution of cryptocurrency regulations in Slovenia:
- 2013:The Slovenian Financial Administration has issued guidelines stating that income from cryptocurrency transactions should be taxed.
- 2017:The Slovenian Financial Administration has provided more detailed guidelines on cryptocurrency taxation, depending on factors such as the status of the trader and the type of transaction.
- 2023:The EU adopted the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) Regulation, establishing a uniform regulatory framework for crypto-assets, their issuers and service providers across the EU.
Endnote
Slovenia’s approach to the cryptocurrency sector is commendable, reflecting its optimistic view of the future of cryptocurrencies. The country’s balanced regulatory framework supports cryptocurrency innovation while protecting users’ rights and preventing illegal activities. Recent developments demonstrate Slovenia’s commitment to continually improving its regulatory environment. Slovenia’s cryptocurrency regulatory framework sets a positive example for other nations navigating the evolving cryptocurrency landscape.
Read also : Hong Kong Cryptocurrency Regulations 2024
Regulation
A Blank Sheet for Cryptocurrencies: Kamala Harris’ Regulatory Opportunity
photo by Shubham Dhage on Unsplash
As the cryptocurrency landscape continues to evolve, the need for clear regulation has never been more pressing.
With Vice President Kamala Harris now leading the charge on digital asset regulation in the United States, this represents a unique opportunity to start fresh. This fresh start can foster innovation and protect consumers. It can also pave the way for widespread adoption across industries, including real estate agencies, healthcare providers, and online gaming platforms like these. online casinos ukAccording to experts at SafestCasinoSites, these platforms come with benefits such as bonus offers, a wide selection of games, and various payment methods. Ultimately, all this increase in adoption could propel the cryptocurrency market forward.
With this in mind, let’s look at the current state of cryptocurrency regulation in the United States, a complex and confusing landscape. Multiple agencies, including the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), have overlapping jurisdictions, creating a fragmented regulatory environment. This lack of clarity has stifled innovation as companies are reluctant to invest in the United States, fearing regulatory repercussions. A coherent and clear regulatory framework is urgently needed to realize the full potential of cryptocurrencies in the United States.
While the US struggles to find its footing, other countries, such as Singapore and the UK, are actively looking into the cryptocurrency sector by adopting clear and supportive regulatory frameworks. This has led to a brain drain, with companies choosing to locate in more conducive environments.
Vice President Kamala Harris has a unique opportunity to change that narrative and start over. Regulation of cryptocurrencies. By taking a comprehensive and inclusive approach, it can help create a framework that balances consumer protection with innovation and growth. The time has come for clear and effective regulation of cryptocurrencies in the United States.
Effective regulation of digital assets is essential to foster a safe and innovative environment. The key principles guiding this regulation are clarity, innovation, global cooperation, consumer protection, and flexibility. Clear definitions and guidelines eliminate ambiguity while encouraging experimentation and development to ensure progress. Collaboration with international partners establishes consistent standards, preventing regulatory arbitrage. Strong safeguards protect consumers from fraud and market abuse, and adaptability allows for evolution in response to emerging trends and technologies, striking a balance between innovation and protection.
The benefits of effective cryptocurrency regulation are multiple and far-reaching. By establishing clear guidelines, governments can attract investors and mainstream users, driving growth and adoption. This can, in turn, position countries like the United States as global leaders in fintech and innovation. Strong safeguards will also increase consumer confidence in digital assets and related products, increasing economic activity.
A thriving crypto industry can contribute significantly to GDP and job creation, which has a positive impact on the overall economy. Furthermore, effective regulation has paved the way for the growth of many businesses such as tech startups, online casinos, and pharmaceutical companies, demonstrating that clear guidelines can open up new opportunities without stifling innovation. This is a great example of how regulation can allay fears of regressive policies, even if Kamala Harris does not repeal the current progressive approach. By adopting effective regulation, governments can create fertile ground for the crypto industry to thrive, thereby promoting progress and prosperity.
Regulation
South Korea Imposes New ‘Monitoring’ Fees on Cryptocurrency Exchanges
Big news! The latest regulatory changes in South Korea are expected to impact major cryptocurrency exchanges like Upbit and Bithumb. Under the updated regulations, these platforms will now have to pay monitoring fees, which could cause problems for some exchanges.
Overview of new fees
In the latest move to regulate cryptocurrencies, the Financial Services Commission announced on July 1 the revised “Enforcement Order of the Act on the Establishment of the Financial Services Commission, etc.” update “Regulations on the collection of contributions from financial institutions, etc.” According to local legislation newsThe regulations require virtual asset operators to pay supervisory fees for inspections conducted by the Financial Supervisory Service starting next year. The total fees for the four major exchanges are estimated at around 300 million won, or about $220,000.
Apportionment of costs
Upbit, which holds a dominant market share, is expected to bear more than 90% of the total fee, or about 272 million won ($199,592) based on its operating revenue. Bithumb will pay about 21.14 million won ($155,157), while Coinone and GOPAX will contribute about 6.03 million won ($4,422) and 830,000 won ($608), respectively. Korbit is excluded from this fee due to its lower operating revenue.
Impact on the industry
The supervision fee will function similarly to a quasi-tax for financial institutions subject to inspections by the Financial Supervisory Service. The new law requires any company with a turnover of 3 billion won or more to pay the fee.
In the past, fees for electronic financial companies and P2P investment firms were phased in over three years. However, the taxation of virtual asset operators has been accelerated, reflecting the rapid growth of the cryptocurrency market and increasing regulatory scrutiny.
Industry reactions
The rapid introduction of the fee was unexpected by some industry players, who had expected a delay. Financial Supervisory Service officials justified the decision by citing the creation of the body concerned and the costs already incurred.
While larger exchanges like Upbit and Bithumb can afford the cost, smaller exchanges like Coinone and GOPAX, which are currently operating at a loss, could face an additional financial burden. This is part of a broader trend of declining trading volumes for South Korean exchanges, which have seen a 30% drop since the new law went into effect.
-
Regulation7 months ago
Ripple CTO and Cardano founder clash over XRP’s regulatory challenges ⋆ ZyCrypto
-
Regulation5 months ago
Nancy Pelosi Considers Supporting Republican Crypto Bill FIT21 – London Business News
-
Videos6 months ago
Cryptocurrency News: Bitcoin, ETH ETF, AI Crypto Rally, AKT, TON & MORE!!
-
Regulation6 months ago
Bitcoin’s future is ‘bleak’ and ripe for regulation, says lead developer
-
News6 months ago
The trader earned $46 million with PEPE after reaching a new ATH
-
Blockchain6 months ago
Solana ranks the fastest blockchain in the world, surpassing Ethereum, Polygon ⋆ ZyCrypto
-
Blockchain6 months ago
Solana Surpasses Ethereum and Polygon as the Fastest Blockchain ⋆ ZyCrypto
-
Regulation6 months ago
🔒 Crypto needs regulation to thrive: Tyler Cowen
-
Videos6 months ago
Who Really CONTROLS THE MARKETS!! Her plans REVEALED!!
-
Videos7 months ago
Kucoin safe?? Exchange REVIEW and beginner’s guide!!
-
Blockchain6 months ago
“Liquid vesting” is an oxymoronic feature of blockchain that allows early investors to sell without waiting
-
Videos6 months ago
Institutions purchasing MEMECOINS?! Everything you need to know!