Regulation
Is FTX’s Sam Bankman-Fried Right About DeFi Regulation?
Last week, while speaking to Politico, Sam Bankman-Fried, the billionaire founder of FTX and Alameda Research, said he had significantly revised his spending on political campaigns. He said his previously announced plan to spend more than $1 billion was a “stupid quote.”
Since the start of the year, SBF has spent approximately $40 million supporting Democratic and Republican election campaigns from coast to coast. So far, that spending appears to have paid off, according to CNBC report the majority of Bankman-Fried’s political candidates gained an advantage in the primary elections. But the former Wall Street quant believes there’s a limit to what money can buy in general elections.
This article is excerpted from The Node, CoinDesk’s daily digest of the most crucial stories in blockchain and crypto news. You can subscribe to receive the full newsletter here.
“At some point, when you’ve gotten your message to voters, there’s just not much more you can do,” Bankman-Fried said in the release. Political interview. “You can spend more time and more messages, more money, more other things [but] you accomplish nothing more.
Much has been written about Bankman-Fried and “effective altruism,” the political theory he subscribes to which holds that people create wealth and give it away either by making targeted donations now or by founding well-off charities. later endowed by the magic of compound interest. .
I guess he feels his money is better spent elsewhere than on a TV commercial in Scranton, Pennsylvania. But where will his money and influence go? The problem with effective altruism is that it is a way of thinking that allows people to rationalize any of their actions.
Bankman-Fried’s political pragmatism was also visible in his recently published crypto-regulatory manifesto “Possible digital asset industry standards.” The blog, what SBF calls “an industry standards playbook,” outlines the path forward for crypto industry self-regulation. Somewhat surprisingly, the sectoral requirements of the SBF have been widely criticized.
It covered seven areas where crypto could write rules for itself while waiting for clearer regulations from above. Some are very simple: more disclosures on crypto advertising, regular audits for cash-backed stablecoins, and a three-step checklist for crypto exchanges determining whether a token they want to list is a security.
Others show how crypto has rubbed off on SBF: It wants a standard where hackers are guaranteed 5% of the bounty if they mine a protocol – assuming they return the rest. (This could encourage more ethical hacking, one of the ways code enthusiasts believe the industry is literally evolving.)
But SBF ran into issues on social media when writing about decentralized finance (DeFi). He proposed a “suitability test” that would restrict access to cryptocurrencies, much like accredited investor rules based on net worth and other factors in the traditional market. This goes against the dominant open source philosophy of cryptography: equal access for all.
It also initially proposed a licensing system for websites that interact with DeFi and other crypto protocols, as well as an automatic blacklist to prevent sanctioned players from using centralized services. Adam Cochran of Synthetix and Yearn Finance called the rules “a moat that allows centralized entities to control at least part of the flow to DeFi”.
In response to the project, many noted that SBF seemed less concerned about the freedoms offered by DeFi than the centralized revenue companies that can leverage the industry. Industry gossip site Rekt, who wrote that he “positioned himself as the US government-approved guardian” of cryptography, and that he was elsewhere compared to a drug lord.
The most compelling arguments came from Erik Vorhees, founder of Bitcoin OG and ShapeShift, who noted self-enforced rules and blacklists would only serve established exchanges that could afford to pay to comply. “You can advocate effective altruism, or you can advocate barring 80 million innocent Iranians from the future of global finance,” Voorhees tweeted. “You can’t do both.”
SBF took the criticism with equanimity, reworked parts of its draft, and wrote a lengthy Twitter thread addressing the particular concerns of a number of critics. The heart of the debate cannot, however, be ironed out. The SBF is a realist who sees regulation coming and wishes to participate in its construction.
This will always offend ideologically motivated crypto advocates, who see crypto itself as a way to improve the world. For its part, SBF never fully embraced the crypto mindset – and it has gone on record to say so. For him, crypto is a means to an end: creating wealth so that those funds can be redirected. (Remember infinite DeFi Fiasco of the “box”?)
Even if criticism remains of the watered-down project, the SBF clarified that he was talking about centralized on-ramps to cryptography, not self-executing protocols. “These are not statements about what DeFi developers, smart contracts, and validators should do,” Bankman-Fried wrote. “It ultimately seeks to establish guidelines for how, for example, the FTX platform – or Fidelity’s – could interface with DeFi contracts.”
The debate over whether crypto should capitulate and erect barriers to entry in the name of protecting the uninformed is actually just beginning. Concessions have been made and will continue to be made, but ultimately it doesn’t matter whether you’re a pragmatist or an ideologue as long as the code works. (This is part, but not all, of the reason BitBoy Alex Jones-style rant that SBF sells itself to “suits…with deep pockets” is ridiculous.)
In response to its critics, SBF emphasized that the industry must resist censorship of peer-to-peer transfers and blockchain validation. This has little to do with whether websites or front-ends block users, or whether DeFi applications follow US Treasury Department sanctions. The question is: where do you want to make the effort? Where does it really matter? Is crypto in “primaries” or “general?” »
Regulation
Crypto community gets involved in anti-government protests in Nigeria
Amid the #EndBadGovernanceInNigeria protests in Nigeria, a notable shift is occurring within the country’s cryptocurrency sector. As the general public demands sweeping governance reforms, crypto community leaders are seizing the opportunity to advocate for specific regulatory changes.
Rume Ophi, former secretary of the Blockchain Stakeholders Association of Nigeria (SiBAN), stressed the critical need to integrate crypto-focused demands into the broader agenda of the protests.
Ophi explained the dual benefit of such requirements, noting that proper regulation can spur substantial economic growth by attracting investors and creating job opportunities. Ophi noted, “Including calls for favorable crypto regulations is not just about the crypto community; it’s about leveraging these technologies to foster broader economic prosperity.”
Existing government efforts
In opposition to Ophi’s call for action, Chimezie Chuta, chair of the National Blockchain Policy Steering Committee, presents a different view. He pointed out The Nigerian government continued efforts to nurture the blockchain and cryptocurrency industries.
According to Chuta, the creation of a steering committee was essential to effectively address the needs of the crypto community.
Chuta also highlighted the creation of a subcommittee to harmonize regulations for virtual asset service providers (VASPs). With the aim of streamlining operations and providing clear regulatory direction, the initiative involves cooperation with major organizations including the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN). “Our efforts should mitigate the need for protest as substantial progress is being made to address the needs of the crypto industry,” Chuta said.
A united call for support
The ongoing dialogue between the crypto community and government agencies reflects a complex landscape of negotiations and demands for progress.
While actors like Ophi are calling for more direct action and the inclusion of crypto demands in protest agendas, government figures like Chuta are advocating for recognition of the steps already taken.
As protests continue, the crypto community’s push for regulatory reform highlights a crucial aspect of Nigeria’s broader fight to improve governance and economic policies. Both sides agree that favorable regulations are critical to the successful adoption and implementation of blockchain technologies, signaling a potentially transformative era for Nigeria’s economic framework.
Read also : OKX Exchange Exits Nigerian Market Amid Regulatory Crackdown
Regulation
Cryptocurrency Regulations in Slovenia 2024
Slovenia, a small but highly developed European country with a population of 2.1 million, boasts a rich industrial history that has contributed greatly to its strong economy. As the most economically developed Slavic nation, Slovenia has grown steadily since adopting the euro in 2007. Its openness to innovation has been a key factor in its success in the industrial sector, making it a prime destination for cryptocurrency enthusiasts. Many believe that Slovenia is poised to become a powerful fintech hub in Europe. But does its current regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies support such aspirations?
Let’s explore Slovenia’s cryptocurrency regulations and see if they can propel the country to the forefront of the cryptocurrency landscape. My expectations are positive. What are yours? Before we answer, let’s dig a little deeper.
1. Cryptocurrency regulation in Slovenia: an overview
Slovenia is renowned for its innovation-friendly stance, providing a supportive environment for emerging technologies such as blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Under the Payment Services and Systems Act, cryptocurrencies are classified as virtual assets rather than financial or monetary instruments.
The regulation of the cryptocurrency sector in Slovenia is decentralized. Different authorities manage different aspects of the ecosystem. For example, the Bank of Slovenia and the Securities Market Agency oversee cryptocurrency transactions to ensure compliance with financial laws, including anti-money laundering (AML) and terrorist financing regulations. The Slovenian Act on the Prevention of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing (ZPPDFT-2) incorporates the EU’s 5th Anti-Money Laundering Directive (5MLD) and aligns with the latest FATF recommendations. All virtual currency service providers must register with the Office of the Republic of Slovenia.
2. Cryptocurrency regulation in Slovenia: what’s new?
Several notable developments have taken place this year in the cryptocurrency sector in Slovenia:
July 25, 2024:Slovenia has issued a €30 million on-chain digital sovereign bond, the first of its kind in the EU, with a yield of 3.65%, maturing on 25 November 2024.
May 14, 2024:NiceHash has announced the first Slovenian Bitcoin-focused conference, NiceHashX, scheduled for November 8-9 in Maribor.
3. Explanation of the tax framework for cryptocurrencies in Slovenia
The Slovenian cryptocurrency tax framework provides clear guidelines for individuals and businesses. According to the Slovenian Financial Administration, the tax treatment depends on the status of the trader and the nature of the transaction.
- People:Income earned from cryptocurrencies through employment or ongoing business activities is subject to personal income tax. However, capital gains from transactions or market fluctuations are exempt from tax.
- Companies:Capital gains from cryptocurrency-related activities are subject to a 19% corporate tax. Value-added tax (VAT) generally applies at a rate of 22%, although cryptocurrency transactions that are considered as means of payment are exempt from VAT. Companies are not allowed to limit payment methods to cryptocurrencies alone. Tokens issued during ICOs must follow standard accounting rules and corporate tax law.
4. Cryptocurrency Mining in Slovenia: What You Need to Know
Cryptocurrency mining is not restricted in Slovenia, but income from mining is considered business income and is therefore taxable. This includes rewards from validating transactions and any additional income from mining operations. Both individuals and legal entities must comply with Slovenian tax regulations.
5. Timeline of the development of cryptocurrency regulation in Slovenia
Here is a timeline highlighting the evolution of cryptocurrency regulations in Slovenia:
- 2013:The Slovenian Financial Administration has issued guidelines stating that income from cryptocurrency transactions should be taxed.
- 2017:The Slovenian Financial Administration has provided more detailed guidelines on cryptocurrency taxation, depending on factors such as the status of the trader and the type of transaction.
- 2023:The EU adopted the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) Regulation, establishing a uniform regulatory framework for crypto-assets, their issuers and service providers across the EU.
Endnote
Slovenia’s approach to the cryptocurrency sector is commendable, reflecting its optimistic view of the future of cryptocurrencies. The country’s balanced regulatory framework supports cryptocurrency innovation while protecting users’ rights and preventing illegal activities. Recent developments demonstrate Slovenia’s commitment to continually improving its regulatory environment. Slovenia’s cryptocurrency regulatory framework sets a positive example for other nations navigating the evolving cryptocurrency landscape.
Read also : Hong Kong Cryptocurrency Regulations 2024
Regulation
A Blank Sheet for Cryptocurrencies: Kamala Harris’ Regulatory Opportunity
photo by Shubham Dhage on Unsplash
As the cryptocurrency landscape continues to evolve, the need for clear regulation has never been more pressing.
With Vice President Kamala Harris now leading the charge on digital asset regulation in the United States, this represents a unique opportunity to start fresh. This fresh start can foster innovation and protect consumers. It can also pave the way for widespread adoption across industries, including real estate agencies, healthcare providers, and online gaming platforms like these. online casinos ukAccording to experts at SafestCasinoSites, these platforms come with benefits such as bonus offers, a wide selection of games, and various payment methods. Ultimately, all this increase in adoption could propel the cryptocurrency market forward.
With this in mind, let’s look at the current state of cryptocurrency regulation in the United States, a complex and confusing landscape. Multiple agencies, including the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), have overlapping jurisdictions, creating a fragmented regulatory environment. This lack of clarity has stifled innovation as companies are reluctant to invest in the United States, fearing regulatory repercussions. A coherent and clear regulatory framework is urgently needed to realize the full potential of cryptocurrencies in the United States.
While the US struggles to find its footing, other countries, such as Singapore and the UK, are actively looking into the cryptocurrency sector by adopting clear and supportive regulatory frameworks. This has led to a brain drain, with companies choosing to locate in more conducive environments.
Vice President Kamala Harris has a unique opportunity to change that narrative and start over. Regulation of cryptocurrencies. By taking a comprehensive and inclusive approach, it can help create a framework that balances consumer protection with innovation and growth. The time has come for clear and effective regulation of cryptocurrencies in the United States.
Effective regulation of digital assets is essential to foster a safe and innovative environment. The key principles guiding this regulation are clarity, innovation, global cooperation, consumer protection, and flexibility. Clear definitions and guidelines eliminate ambiguity while encouraging experimentation and development to ensure progress. Collaboration with international partners establishes consistent standards, preventing regulatory arbitrage. Strong safeguards protect consumers from fraud and market abuse, and adaptability allows for evolution in response to emerging trends and technologies, striking a balance between innovation and protection.
The benefits of effective cryptocurrency regulation are multiple and far-reaching. By establishing clear guidelines, governments can attract investors and mainstream users, driving growth and adoption. This can, in turn, position countries like the United States as global leaders in fintech and innovation. Strong safeguards will also increase consumer confidence in digital assets and related products, increasing economic activity.
A thriving crypto industry can contribute significantly to GDP and job creation, which has a positive impact on the overall economy. Furthermore, effective regulation has paved the way for the growth of many businesses such as tech startups, online casinos, and pharmaceutical companies, demonstrating that clear guidelines can open up new opportunities without stifling innovation. This is a great example of how regulation can allay fears of regressive policies, even if Kamala Harris does not repeal the current progressive approach. By adopting effective regulation, governments can create fertile ground for the crypto industry to thrive, thereby promoting progress and prosperity.
Regulation
South Korea Imposes New ‘Monitoring’ Fees on Cryptocurrency Exchanges
Big news! The latest regulatory changes in South Korea are expected to impact major cryptocurrency exchanges like Upbit and Bithumb. Under the updated regulations, these platforms will now have to pay monitoring fees, which could cause problems for some exchanges.
Overview of new fees
In the latest move to regulate cryptocurrencies, the Financial Services Commission announced on July 1 the revised “Enforcement Order of the Act on the Establishment of the Financial Services Commission, etc.” update “Regulations on the collection of contributions from financial institutions, etc.” According to local legislation newsThe regulations require virtual asset operators to pay supervisory fees for inspections conducted by the Financial Supervisory Service starting next year. The total fees for the four major exchanges are estimated at around 300 million won, or about $220,000.
Apportionment of costs
Upbit, which holds a dominant market share, is expected to bear more than 90% of the total fee, or about 272 million won ($199,592) based on its operating revenue. Bithumb will pay about 21.14 million won ($155,157), while Coinone and GOPAX will contribute about 6.03 million won ($4,422) and 830,000 won ($608), respectively. Korbit is excluded from this fee due to its lower operating revenue.
Impact on the industry
The supervision fee will function similarly to a quasi-tax for financial institutions subject to inspections by the Financial Supervisory Service. The new law requires any company with a turnover of 3 billion won or more to pay the fee.
In the past, fees for electronic financial companies and P2P investment firms were phased in over three years. However, the taxation of virtual asset operators has been accelerated, reflecting the rapid growth of the cryptocurrency market and increasing regulatory scrutiny.
Industry reactions
The rapid introduction of the fee was unexpected by some industry players, who had expected a delay. Financial Supervisory Service officials justified the decision by citing the creation of the body concerned and the costs already incurred.
While larger exchanges like Upbit and Bithumb can afford the cost, smaller exchanges like Coinone and GOPAX, which are currently operating at a loss, could face an additional financial burden. This is part of a broader trend of declining trading volumes for South Korean exchanges, which have seen a 30% drop since the new law went into effect.
-
Regulation5 months ago
Nancy Pelosi Considers Supporting Republican Crypto Bill FIT21 – London Business News
-
Regulation7 months ago
Ripple CTO and Cardano founder clash over XRP’s regulatory challenges ⋆ ZyCrypto
-
Videos7 months ago
Cryptocurrency News: Bitcoin, ETH ETF, AI Crypto Rally, AKT, TON & MORE!!
-
Regulation6 months ago
Bitcoin’s future is ‘bleak’ and ripe for regulation, says lead developer
-
News6 months ago
The trader earned $46 million with PEPE after reaching a new ATH
-
Blockchain6 months ago
Solana ranks the fastest blockchain in the world, surpassing Ethereum, Polygon ⋆ ZyCrypto
-
Blockchain6 months ago
Solana Surpasses Ethereum and Polygon as the Fastest Blockchain ⋆ ZyCrypto
-
Regulation6 months ago
🔒 Crypto needs regulation to thrive: Tyler Cowen
-
Videos7 months ago
Kucoin safe?? Exchange REVIEW and beginner’s guide!!
-
Videos7 months ago
Who Really CONTROLS THE MARKETS!! Her plans REVEALED!!
-
Blockchain6 months ago
“Liquid vesting” is an oxymoronic feature of blockchain that allows early investors to sell without waiting
-
Videos7 months ago
Institutions purchasing MEMECOINS?! Everything you need to know!